Comparative study on 16-slice CT coronary angiography vs conventional coronary angiography - A report of 38 cases

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Yan [1 ]
Han, Ping [1 ]
Liang, Bo [1 ]
Liang, Huimin [1 ]
Lei, Ziqiao [1 ]
Tian, Zhiliang [1 ]
Fen, Gansheng [1 ]
Xiao, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Radiol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
关键词
X-ray computed; tomography; coronary artery disease; angiocardiography;
D O I
10.1007/s11596-008-0128-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The clinical application of 16-slice CT coronary angiogaphy (CTCA) and the impact of plaques differently characterized on assessing coronary artery stenosis were evaluated. Thirty-eight patients with coronary artery disease diagnosed by conventional coronary angiography (CAG) underwent 16-slice CTCA (collimation: 16x0.75 mm; rotation time: 420 msec; kernel: 35f; effective current: 500 mAs; tube voltage: 120 W). The interval between CTCA and CAG was within one month. CTCA was evaluated by consensus of two independent experienced radiologists unknowing CAG findings. Original images, maximum intensity projections and multiplanar reconstructions were used to assess coronary artery stenosis. For a determined plaque an attenuation value >= 130 HU was considered as calcified, and <130 HU noncalcified. The plaques were then classified into significant calcification (extensive calcification), medium calcification (small isolated calcification) and noncalcification. The diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice CTCA findings as well as to detect : >= 50% stenoses caused by plaques was evaluated respectively regarding CAG as the standard of reference. In comparison with CAG findings, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value derived from CTCA for mild stenosis (<50%) were 72.7%, 38.5%, 50%, 62.5%, respectively; for moderate stenosis (50%-75%) 82.4%, 72.7%, 70%, 84.2%, resepctively; and for severe coronary stenosis (>75%) 85%, 90.5%, 81%, 92.7% respectively. With the increase of stenoses degree, the value of CTCA was greater. For the classification of the plaque calcification with >= 50% stenosis CTCA attained the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for severe calcificatoin 73.3%, 22.2%, 61.1% and 33.3%, respectively; for moderate calcification 70%, 55.6%, 63.6% and 62.5%, respectively; for noncalcification 93.8%, 85.7%, 93.8% and 85.7% respectively. CTCA was restricted in assessing coronary artery stenosis in the presence of calcification, but CTCA value was much improved in assessing non-calcified stenosis. It was concluded that 16-slice CTCA could provide useful information about coronary artery stenosis, especially for severe stenosis (:>= 50%) and non-calcified plaque. Since CTCA is a noninvasive technique, it may be useful in screening coronary artery disease.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 113
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis Using 16-slice Spiral CT: a Comparison with Selective X-ray Coronary Angiography
    史河水
    韩萍
    孔祥泉
    冯敢生
    Martin HK Hoffmann
    华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版), 2006, (03) : 338 - 340
  • [22] Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice spiral CT: A comparison with selective X-ray coronary angiography
    Shi Heshui
    Han Ping
    Kong Xiangquan
    Feng Gangsheng
    Martin HK Hoffmann
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2006, 26 (3): : 338 - 340
  • [23] Noninvasive coronary angiography performed with 4-slice, 12-slice, 16-slice and 64-slice CT: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy
    Pugliese, F
    Cademartiri, F
    Mollet, NR
    Nieman, K
    Meijboom, WB
    Krestin, GP
    deFeyter, PJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 130A - 130A
  • [24] Dose levels at coronary CT angiography-a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT
    Kerl, J. Matthias
    Bauer, Ralf W.
    Maurer, Tobias B.
    Aschenbach, Rene
    Korkusuz, Huedayi
    Lehnert, Thomas
    Deseive, Simon
    Ackermann, Hanns
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) : 530 - 537
  • [25] Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy between Coronary CT Angiography and Conventional Coronary Angiography
    Nejadbahram, Hanieh
    Kiavar, Majid
    Madadi, Shabnam
    IRANIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 19 (01): : 30 - 36
  • [26] Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT
    Rixe, J.
    Conradi, G.
    Rolf, A.
    Schmermund, A.
    Magedanz, A.
    Erkapic, D.
    Deetjen, A.
    Hamm, C. W.
    Dill, T.
    HEART, 2009, 95 (16) : 1337 - 1342
  • [27] Patients experience from CT coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography
    Diederichsen, A.
    Petersen, H.
    Johansen, A.
    Sandgaard, N.
    Hoilund-Carlsen, P. F.
    Mickley, Hans Frederik H. F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 11 (0B) : S38 - S38
  • [28] Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice CT: at last an alternative to conventional coronary angiography?
    Erill, JE
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2004, 57 (03): : 198 - 200
  • [29] 16-Slice multidetector-row CT angiography in the assessment of stenoocclusive disease of the carotid artery bifurcation: Comparison with conventional angiography
    Roh, HG
    Lee, SH
    Kim, EY
    Byun, HS
    STROKE, 2004, 35 (06) : E262 - E262
  • [30] DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF 16-SLICE VERSUS DUAL SOURCE 64-SLICE MDCT ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE EVALUATION OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Sahiner, L.
    Yorgun, H.
    Canpolat, U.
    Hazirolan, T.
    Aytemir, K.
    Oto, A.
    Karcaaltincaba, M.
    Akata, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 147 : S59 - S59