Comparative study on 16-slice CT coronary angiography vs conventional coronary angiography - A report of 38 cases

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Yan [1 ]
Han, Ping [1 ]
Liang, Bo [1 ]
Liang, Huimin [1 ]
Lei, Ziqiao [1 ]
Tian, Zhiliang [1 ]
Fen, Gansheng [1 ]
Xiao, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Radiol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
关键词
X-ray computed; tomography; coronary artery disease; angiocardiography;
D O I
10.1007/s11596-008-0128-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The clinical application of 16-slice CT coronary angiogaphy (CTCA) and the impact of plaques differently characterized on assessing coronary artery stenosis were evaluated. Thirty-eight patients with coronary artery disease diagnosed by conventional coronary angiography (CAG) underwent 16-slice CTCA (collimation: 16x0.75 mm; rotation time: 420 msec; kernel: 35f; effective current: 500 mAs; tube voltage: 120 W). The interval between CTCA and CAG was within one month. CTCA was evaluated by consensus of two independent experienced radiologists unknowing CAG findings. Original images, maximum intensity projections and multiplanar reconstructions were used to assess coronary artery stenosis. For a determined plaque an attenuation value >= 130 HU was considered as calcified, and <130 HU noncalcified. The plaques were then classified into significant calcification (extensive calcification), medium calcification (small isolated calcification) and noncalcification. The diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice CTCA findings as well as to detect : >= 50% stenoses caused by plaques was evaluated respectively regarding CAG as the standard of reference. In comparison with CAG findings, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value derived from CTCA for mild stenosis (<50%) were 72.7%, 38.5%, 50%, 62.5%, respectively; for moderate stenosis (50%-75%) 82.4%, 72.7%, 70%, 84.2%, resepctively; and for severe coronary stenosis (>75%) 85%, 90.5%, 81%, 92.7% respectively. With the increase of stenoses degree, the value of CTCA was greater. For the classification of the plaque calcification with >= 50% stenosis CTCA attained the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for severe calcificatoin 73.3%, 22.2%, 61.1% and 33.3%, respectively; for moderate calcification 70%, 55.6%, 63.6% and 62.5%, respectively; for noncalcification 93.8%, 85.7%, 93.8% and 85.7% respectively. CTCA was restricted in assessing coronary artery stenosis in the presence of calcification, but CTCA value was much improved in assessing non-calcified stenosis. It was concluded that 16-slice CTCA could provide useful information about coronary artery stenosis, especially for severe stenosis (:>= 50%) and non-calcified plaque. Since CTCA is a noninvasive technique, it may be useful in screening coronary artery disease.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 113
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative study on 16-slice CT coronary angiography vs conventional coronary angiography—A report of 38 cases
    Yan Chen
    Ping Han
    Bo Liang
    Huimin Liang
    Ziqiao Lei
    Zhiliang Tian
    Gansheng Feng
    Jie Xiao
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2008, 28 : 110 - 113
  • [2] Determining the proportion of coronary segments assessable on 16-slice CT coronary angiography: A brief report
    Soon, K. H.
    Cox, N.
    Chaitowitz, I.
    Bell, K. W.
    Eccleston, D.
    Kelly, A-M
    Lim, Y.
    AUSTRALASIAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 51 (02): : 139 - 142
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice CT coronary angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease
    Soon, K. H.
    Chaitowitz, I.
    Cox, N.
    MacGregor, L.
    Eccleston, D.
    Bell, K. W.
    Kelly, A-M
    Lim, Y. L.
    AUSTRALASIAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 51 (04): : 365 - 369
  • [4] Comparison of 16-Slice Computed Tomography with Conventional Angiography to Evaluate Coronary Artery Stent Patency
    Durur-Subasi, Irmak
    Kantarci, Mecit
    Durur-Karakaya, Afak
    Okur, Adnan
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 41 (01): : 4 - 9
  • [5] Coronary Angiography by 16-Slice Computed Tomography Prior to Valvular Surgery
    Rodriguez-Palomares, Jose F.
    Cuellar, Hug
    Marti, Gerard
    Garcia, Bruno
    Teresa Gonzalez-Alujas, M.
    Mahia, Patricia
    Evangelista, Arturo
    Tornos, Pilar
    Garcia-Dorado, David
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2011, 64 (04): : 269 - 276
  • [6] Non-invasive coronary angiography: 16-slice computed tomography vs. 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging validated by coronary angiography
    Langer, Christoph
    Wiemer, Marcus
    Peterschroder, Andreas
    Franzke, Karin
    Esdorn, Hermann
    Huske-Kraus, Dirk
    Korperich, Hermann
    Meyer, Hans
    Horstkotte, Dieter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 131A - 132A
  • [7] Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Ultrafast 16-Slice Computed Tomography Images and CT Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography at One Year in Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Malhotra, Rajneesh
    Mishra, Manisha
    Khurana, Poonam
    Aggarwal, Monika
    Mishra, Yugal
    Meharwal, Zile Singh
    Kohli, Vijay
    Bapna, Ramesh Kumar
    Kasliwal, Ravi Ratan
    Mehta, Yatin
    Trehan, Naresh
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 1 (02) : 92 - 95
  • [8] Validation of non-invasive coronary angiography by 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography in comparison to invasive coronary angiography
    Kaiser, C
    Pater, S
    Bremerich, J
    Bongartz, G
    Steinbrich, W
    Pfisterer, M
    Buser, P
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 725 - 725
  • [9] Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-slice detector computed tomography: Initial experience
    Schroeder, S
    Kopp, AF
    Kuettner, A
    Traboldt, T
    Heuschmitt, M
    Beck, T
    Burgstahler, C
    Athanasiou, T
    Seipel, L
    Claussen, CD
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 467A - 468A
  • [10] CT coronary angiography with 16-row multi-slice scanner: Do we still need conventional coronary angiography?
    Cademartiri, F
    Runza, G
    Belgrano, M
    Malagutti, P
    Mollet, N
    De Feyter, P
    EMERGING PATHOLOGIES IN CARDIOLOGY, 2005, : 381 - 388