Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

被引:29
|
作者
Lopez, Cesar D. [1 ,2 ]
Gazgalis, Anastasia [1 ]
Boddapati, Venkat [1 ]
Shah, Roshan P. [1 ]
Cooper, John [1 ]
Geller, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York Presbyterian, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] 622 W 168th St PH-11, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Artificial neural networks; Orthopedic surgery; Hip and knee arthroplasty; ALGORITHMS; PREDICT; REPLACEMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; INTELLIGENCE; PAYMENTS; ACHIEVE; WILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2021.07.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) modeling in hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) is becoming more commonplace. This systematic review aims to quantify the accuracy of current AI- and ML-based application for cognitive support and decision-making in TJA. Methods: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Analysis of variance testing with post-hoc Tukey test was applied to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of the models. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 studies were included in this review. The application of AI/ML-based models and average AUC is as follows: cost prediction-0.77, LOS and discharges-0.78, readmissions and reoperations-0.66, preoperative patient selection/planning-0.79, adverse events and other postoperative complications-0.84, postoperative pain-0.83, postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures and functional outcome-0.81. Significant variability in model AUC across the different decision support applications was found (P < .001) with the AUC for readmission and reoperation models being significantly lower than that of the other decision support categories. Conclusions: AI/ML-based applications in TJA continue to expand and have the potential to optimize patient selection and accurately predict postoperative outcomes, complications, and associated costs. On average, the AI/ML models performed best in predicting postoperative complications, pain, and patientreported outcomes and were less accurate in predicting hospital readmissions and reoperations. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 112
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review
    Quinlan D. Buchlak
    Nazanin Esmaili
    Jean-Christophe Leveque
    Farrokh Farrokhi
    Christine Bennett
    Massimo Piccardi
    Rajiv K. Sethi
    Neurosurgical Review, 2020, 43 : 1235 - 1253
  • [22] Machine learning in knee arthroplasty: specific data are key-a systematic review
    Hinterwimmer, Florian
    Lazic, Igor
    Suren, Christian
    Hirschmann, Michael T.
    Pohlig, Florian
    Rueckert, Daniel
    Burgkart, Rainer
    von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rudiger
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (02) : 376 - 388
  • [23] Machine learning in shoulder arthroplasty a systematic review of predictive analytics applications
    Schneller, T.
    Kraus, M.
    Schatz, J.
    Moroder, P.
    Scheibel, M.
    Lazaridou, A.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2025, 6 (02): : 126 - 134
  • [24] Can minimal clinically important differences in patient reported outcome measures be predicted by machine learning in patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty? A systematic review
    Benedikt Langenberger
    Andreas Thoma
    Verena Vogt
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22
  • [25] Can minimal clinically important differences in patient reported outcome measures be predicted by machine learning in patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty? A systematic review
    Langenberger, Benedikt
    Thoma, Andreas
    Vogt, Verena
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [26] Artificial intelligence and machine learning on diagnosis and classification of hip fracture: systematic review
    Cha, Yonghan
    Kim, Jung-Taek
    Park, Chan-Ho
    Kim, Jin-Woo
    Lee, Sang Yeob
    Yoo, Jun-Il
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [27] Artificial intelligence and machine learning on diagnosis and classification of hip fracture: systematic review
    Yonghan Cha
    Jung-Taek Kim
    Chan-Ho Park
    Jin-Woo Kim
    Sang Yeob Lee
    Jun-Il Yoo
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [28] RETURN TO WORK AFTER TOTAL KNEE AND HIP ARTHROPLASTY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Tilbury, C.
    Schaasberg, W.
    Plevier, J. W.
    Fiocco, M.
    Vliet-Vlieland, T. P.
    Nelissen, R. G.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2013, 72 : 692 - 692
  • [29] A systematic review of the applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in autoimmune diseases
    I. S. Stafford
    M. Kellermann
    E. Mossotto
    R. M. Beattie
    B. D. MacArthur
    S. Ennis
    npj Digital Medicine, 3
  • [30] Return to work after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Tilbury, Claire
    Schaasberg, Wouter
    Plevier, Jose W. M.
    Fiocco, Marta
    Nelissen, Rob G. H. H.
    Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 (03) : 512 - 525