Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

被引:29
|
作者
Lopez, Cesar D. [1 ,2 ]
Gazgalis, Anastasia [1 ]
Boddapati, Venkat [1 ]
Shah, Roshan P. [1 ]
Cooper, John [1 ]
Geller, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York Presbyterian, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] 622 W 168th St PH-11, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Artificial neural networks; Orthopedic surgery; Hip and knee arthroplasty; ALGORITHMS; PREDICT; REPLACEMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; INTELLIGENCE; PAYMENTS; ACHIEVE; WILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2021.07.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) modeling in hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) is becoming more commonplace. This systematic review aims to quantify the accuracy of current AI- and ML-based application for cognitive support and decision-making in TJA. Methods: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Analysis of variance testing with post-hoc Tukey test was applied to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of the models. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 studies were included in this review. The application of AI/ML-based models and average AUC is as follows: cost prediction-0.77, LOS and discharges-0.78, readmissions and reoperations-0.66, preoperative patient selection/planning-0.79, adverse events and other postoperative complications-0.84, postoperative pain-0.83, postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures and functional outcome-0.81. Significant variability in model AUC across the different decision support applications was found (P < .001) with the AUC for readmission and reoperation models being significantly lower than that of the other decision support categories. Conclusions: AI/ML-based applications in TJA continue to expand and have the potential to optimize patient selection and accurately predict postoperative outcomes, complications, and associated costs. On average, the AI/ML models performed best in predicting postoperative complications, pain, and patientreported outcomes and were less accurate in predicting hospital readmissions and reoperations. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 112
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting Functional Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review
    Clement, Nick D.
    Clement, Rosie
    Clement, Abigail
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [2] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in knee arthroplasty ☆
    Rodriguez, Hugo C.
    Rust, Brandon D.
    Roche, Martin W.
    Gupta, Ashim
    KNEE, 2025, 54 : 28 - 49
  • [3] Prehabilitation for Total Knee or Total Hip Arthroplasty A Systematic Review
    Konnyu, Kristin J.
    Thoma, Louise M.
    Cao, Wangnan
    Aaron, Roy K.
    Panagiotou, Orestis A.
    Bhuma, Monika Reddy
    Adam, Gaelen P.
    Pinto, Dan
    Balk, Ethan M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2023, 102 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [4] Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Lopez, Cesar D.
    Boddapati, Venkat
    Lombardi, Joseph M.
    Lee, Nathan J.
    Mathew, Justin
    Danford, Nicholas C.
    Iyer, Rajiv R.
    Dyrszka, Marc D.
    Sardar, Zeeshan M.
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    Lehman, Ronald A.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (07) : 1561 - 1572
  • [5] OUTPATIENT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY, TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, AND UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Pollock, Michael
    Somerville, Lyndsay
    Firth, Andrew
    Lanting, Brent
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2016, 4 (12)
  • [6] The learning curve for the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Leah Nairn
    Lauren Gyemi
    Kyle Gouveia
    Seper Ekhtiari
    Vickas Khanna
    International Orthopaedics, 2021, 45 : 1971 - 1982
  • [7] The learning curve for the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Nairn, Leah
    Gyemi, Lauren
    Gouveia, Kyle
    Ekhtiari, Seper
    Khanna, Vickas
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 45 (08) : 1971 - 1982
  • [8] Machine learning in knee arthroplasty: specific data are key—a systematic review
    Florian Hinterwimmer
    Igor Lazic
    Christian Suren
    Michael T. Hirschmann
    Florian Pohlig
    Daniel Rueckert
    Rainer Burgkart
    Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 376 - 388
  • [9] Application of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Yuk Yee Chong
    Ping Keung Chan
    Vincent Wai Kwan Chan
    Amy Cheung
    Michelle Hilda Luk
    Man Hong Cheung
    Henry Fu
    Kwong Yuen Chiu
    Arthroplasty, 5
  • [10] Application of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Chong, Yuk Yee
    Chan, Ping Keung
    Chan, Vincent Wai Kwan
    Cheung, Amy
    Luk, Michelle Hilda
    Cheung, Man Hong
    Fu, Henry
    Chiu, Kwong Yuen
    ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 5 (01)