How to Use Q-Methodology in Dream Research: Assumptions, Procedures and Benefits

被引:5
|
作者
Parker, Jennifer [1 ]
Alford, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ W England, Dept Psychol, Dream Res Grp, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
Q-methodology; dream types; methodology used in dream research;
D O I
10.1037/a0020422
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Current quantitative methods of approaching dream research, which dominate published material about dreams, have led to descriptions of dreams as homogenous events. Q-methodology is an approach that may identify heterogeneity in dream report studies and subsequent dream types based upon the subjectivity of the dream experience. Q-methodology is described as a "Qttaliquantological" approach to dream analysis which maximizes the use of statistics in a qualitative way (Stenner & Stainton-Rogers, 2004). "Q" is distinguished from other methods because the dreamer sorts the subjectivity of the dream they are reporting and provides a written description of the dream; these are used together to identify shared patterns of subjectivity within a large data set. The advantages of using Q-methodology are outlined and the resources necessary to conduct a study are shared. The aim of this paper is to present a preliminary explanation prior to presenting the first study to use Q-methodology in dream research.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 183
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Making expert processes visible: How and why theorists use assumptions and in their research
    Verostek, Mike
    Griston, Molly
    Botello, Jesus
    Zwickl, Benjamin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2022, 18 (02):
  • [42] The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology study
    Rihtman, Tanya
    Morgan, Mike
    Booth, Julie
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2024, 31 (01)
  • [43] Elicitation of stakeholder viewpoints about medical cannabis research for pain management in critically ill ventilated patients: A Q-methodology study
    DiDiodato, Giulio
    Hassan, Samah
    Cooley, Kieran
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [44] Can stakeholders agree on how to reduce human-carnivore conflict on Namibian livestock farms? A novel Q-methodology and Delphi exercise
    Rust, Niki A.
    ORYX, 2017, 51 (02) : 339 - 346
  • [45] Collaborative research and use of Q methodology to understand technology infusion in teacher preparation
    Jon M. Clausen
    Arlene C. Borthwick
    David Rutledge
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021, 69 : 1617 - 1639
  • [46] Collaborative research and use of Q methodology to understand technology infusion in teacher preparation
    Clausen, Jon M.
    Borthwick, Arlene C.
    Rutledge, David
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 69 (03): : 1617 - 1639
  • [47] What Deserve Studying the Most? A Q-Methodology Approach to Explore Stakeholders' Perspectives on Research Priorities in GenAI-Supported Second Language Education
    Wu, Hanwei
    Pan, Ziwen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2025, 60 (01)
  • [48] USE OF Q-SORT METHODOLOGY IN CROSS-CULTURAL NUTRITION AND HEALTH RESEARCH
    MOORE, J
    NURSING RESEARCH, 1990, 39 (05) : 293 - 293
  • [49] USE OF Q-SORT METHODOLOGY IN CROSS-CULTURAL NUTRITION AND HEALTH RESEARCH
    SIMPSON, SH
    NURSING RESEARCH, 1989, 38 (05) : 289 - 290
  • [50] A "transmission gap" between research and practice? A Q-methodology study of perceptions of the application of attachment theory among clinicians working with children and among attachment researchers
    Beckwith, Helen
    van IJzendoorn, Marinus
    Freeston, Mark
    Woolgar, Matt
    Stenner, Paul
    Duschinsky, Robbie
    ATTACHMENT & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 24 (06) : 661 - 689