Transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review of the experimental and clinical evidence

被引:51
|
作者
Araujo, S. E. [1 ]
Crawshaw, B. [2 ]
Mendes, C. R. [3 ]
Delaney, C. P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, BR-05652901 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Hosp Santa Izabel, Colorectal Surg Unit, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[4] Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Colorectal Surg Unit, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
Transanal TME; TAMIS; Transanal proctectomy; NOTES TME; TEM; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; RECTOSIGMOID RESECTION; SAFE INTRODUCTION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; TAMIS-TME; PROCTECTOMY; FEASIBILITY; ASSISTANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-014-1233-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Achieving a clear distal or circumferential resection margins with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) may be laborious, especially in obese males and when operating on advanced distal rectal tumors with a poor response to neoadjuvant treatment. Transanal (TaTME) is a new natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery modality in which the rectum is mobilized transanally using endoscopic techniques with or without laparoscopic assistance. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of publications on this new technique in PubMed and Embase databases from January, 2008, to July, 2014. Experimental and clinical studies written in English were included. Experimental research with TaTME was done on pigs with and without survival models and on human cadavers. In these studies, laparoscopic or transgastric assistance was frequently used resulting in an easier upper rectal dissection and in a longer rectal specimen. To date, 150 patients in 16 clinical studies have undergone TaTME. In all but 15 cases, transabdominal assistance was used. A rigid transanal endoscopic operations/transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEO/TEM) platform was used in 37 patients. Rectal adenocarcinoma was the indication in all except for nine cases of benign diseases. Operative times ranged from 90 to 460 min. TME quality was deemed intact, satisfactory, or complete. Involvement in circumferential resection margins was detected in 16 (11.8 %) patients. The mean lymph node harvest was equal or greater than 12 in all studies. Regarding morbidity, pneumoretroperitoneum, damage to the urethra, and air embolism were reported intraoperatively. Mean hospital stay varied from 4 to 14 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 34 (22.7 %) patients. TaTME with TEM is feasible in selected cases. Oncologic safety parameters seem to be adequate although the evidence relies on small retrospective series conducted by highly trained surgeons. Further studies are expected.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 82
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision vs Laparoscopic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Low and Middle Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chuahiong, Jodie Ann A.
    Dela Cruz, John Kevin Kim C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S104 - S104
  • [22] Clinical Status and Future Prospects of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision
    Guo, Zichao
    Ji, Xiaopin
    Wang, Shaodong
    Zhang, Yaqi
    Liu, Kun
    Wang, Changgang
    Deng, Yang
    Zhang, Tao
    Cheng, Xi
    Zhao, Ren
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [23] Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Yuksel, Bulent Cavit
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (06) : E383 - E383
  • [24] Robotic total mesorectal excision or transanal total mesorectal excision meta-analysis
    Chen, Michelle Zhiyun
    Tay, Yeng Kwang
    Warrier, Satish K.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    Kong, Joseph C.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (11) : 2269 - 2276
  • [25] A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer
    Gang, Du Yong
    Dong, Lin
    DeChun, Zhang
    Yichi, Zhang
    Ya, Lu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [26] P338: summarizing measures of proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review
    Alen Antoun
    Johnny Chau
    Nourah Alsharqawi
    Pepa Kaneva
    Liane S. Feldman
    Carmen L. Mueller
    Lawrence Lee
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 4817 - 4824
  • [27] Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center experience and systematic review of the literature
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Portigliotti, Luca
    Azoulay, Daniel
    Brunetti, Francesco
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2015, 400 (08) : 945 - 959
  • [28] Defining the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lau, Steve Yee Chiang
    Choy, Kay Tai
    Yang, Tze Wei Wilson
    Heriot, Alexander
    Warrier, Satish K.
    Guest, Glenn D.
    Kong, Joseph C.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (03) : 355 - 364
  • [29] Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center experience and systematic review of the literature
    Nicola de’Angelis
    Luca Portigliotti
    Daniel Azoulay
    Francesco Brunetti
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2015, 400 : 945 - 959
  • [30] Statistical, Clinical, Methodological Evaluation of Local Recurrence Following Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Wasmuth, Hans H.
    Gachabayov, Mahir
    Bokey, Les
    Fingerhut, Abe
    Orangio, Guy R.
    Remzi, Feza H.
    Bergamaschi, Roberto
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (07) : 899 - 914