Transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review of the experimental and clinical evidence

被引:51
|
作者
Araujo, S. E. [1 ]
Crawshaw, B. [2 ]
Mendes, C. R. [3 ]
Delaney, C. P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, BR-05652901 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Hosp Santa Izabel, Colorectal Surg Unit, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[4] Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Colorectal Surg Unit, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
Transanal TME; TAMIS; Transanal proctectomy; NOTES TME; TEM; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; RECTOSIGMOID RESECTION; SAFE INTRODUCTION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; TAMIS-TME; PROCTECTOMY; FEASIBILITY; ASSISTANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-014-1233-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Achieving a clear distal or circumferential resection margins with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) may be laborious, especially in obese males and when operating on advanced distal rectal tumors with a poor response to neoadjuvant treatment. Transanal (TaTME) is a new natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery modality in which the rectum is mobilized transanally using endoscopic techniques with or without laparoscopic assistance. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of publications on this new technique in PubMed and Embase databases from January, 2008, to July, 2014. Experimental and clinical studies written in English were included. Experimental research with TaTME was done on pigs with and without survival models and on human cadavers. In these studies, laparoscopic or transgastric assistance was frequently used resulting in an easier upper rectal dissection and in a longer rectal specimen. To date, 150 patients in 16 clinical studies have undergone TaTME. In all but 15 cases, transabdominal assistance was used. A rigid transanal endoscopic operations/transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEO/TEM) platform was used in 37 patients. Rectal adenocarcinoma was the indication in all except for nine cases of benign diseases. Operative times ranged from 90 to 460 min. TME quality was deemed intact, satisfactory, or complete. Involvement in circumferential resection margins was detected in 16 (11.8 %) patients. The mean lymph node harvest was equal or greater than 12 in all studies. Regarding morbidity, pneumoretroperitoneum, damage to the urethra, and air embolism were reported intraoperatively. Mean hospital stay varied from 4 to 14 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 34 (22.7 %) patients. TaTME with TEM is feasible in selected cases. Oncologic safety parameters seem to be adequate although the evidence relies on small retrospective series conducted by highly trained surgeons. Further studies are expected.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 82
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review of the experimental and clinical evidence
    S. E. Araujo
    B. Crawshaw
    C. R. Mendes
    C. P. Delaney
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2015, 19 : 69 - 82
  • [2] Transanal total mesorectal excision - a systematic review
    Bjorn, Maya Xania
    Perdawood, Sharaf Karim
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 62 (07):
  • [3] Transanal total mesorectal excision
    Cahill, R. A.
    Hompes, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (13) : 1591 - 1593
  • [4] The role of transanal total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Grieco, Michele
    Marcellinaro, Rosa
    Russo, Giulia
    Menditto, Rosa
    Compalati, Iacopo
    Passafiume, Fabiola
    Carlini, Massimo
    MINERVA SURGERY, 2023, 78 (04): : 421 - 432
  • [5] Transanal total mesorectal excision
    Serra-Aracil, Xavier
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2014, 92 (04): : 221 - 222
  • [6] A systematic review and meta-analysis on complications of transanal total mesorectal excision
    An, Yongbo
    Roodbeen, Sapho X.
    Talboom, Kevin
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Hompes, Roel
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (10) : 2527 - 2538
  • [7] A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery?
    Simillis, C.
    Hompes, R.
    Penna, M.
    Rasheed, S.
    Tekkis, P. P.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (01) : 19 - 36
  • [8] Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review
    C. L. Deijen
    A. Tsai
    T. W. A. Koedam
    M. Veltcamp Helbach
    C. Sietses
    A. M. Lacy
    H. J. Bonjer
    J. B. Tuynman
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2016, 20 : 811 - 824
  • [9] Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Deijen, C. L.
    Tsai, A.
    Koedam, T. W. A.
    Helbach, M. Veltcamp
    Sietses, C.
    Lacy, A. M.
    Bonjer, H. J.
    Tuynman, J. B.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 20 (12) : 811 - 824
  • [10] Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Chaouch, Mohamed Ali
    Hussain, Mohammad Iqbal
    Jellali, Maissa
    Gouader, Amine
    Mazzotta, Alessandro
    da Costa, Adriano Carneiro
    Krimi, Bassem
    Khan, Jim
    Oweira, Hani
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024,