A bio-economic model for optimal harvest of timber and moose

被引:15
|
作者
Wam, HK
Hofstad, O
Nævdal, E
Sankhayan, P
机构
[1] Agr Univ Norway, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, N-1432 As, Norway
[2] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Agr Univ Norway, Dept Econ & Resource Management, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Alces alces; bio-economic model; forest; harvest; moose; Picea abies; pine;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.062
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We present a dynamic optimization model for harvesting timber and moose when the moose inflicts costs by browsing young trees. To illustrate its behaviour, the model was run numerically for Norwegian market conditions. Optimal management in our model kept moose at an approximately 70% lower density than if managed without concern for Limber production. Further. the harvest of moose was slightly reduced around the time of timbering to take advantage of increased forage production in coming years. Thereby a fluctuating pattern in moose harvest was generated over time. The amplitude of these fluctuations depended on the productivity of the site, while the period of the fluctuations depended on the fixed costs of harvesting Limber. On a particular land, the optimal harvesting strategy for timber was determined by (i) the relationship between timber prices and fixed costs of harvesting, (ii) the relationship between prices of timber and moose, and (iii) the length of the planning period in relation to initial standing biomass of trees. Within a wide range of the present market regime. combined production of both timber and moose was the most profitable strategy. Still, for all our planning scenarios more than 90% of the income came from timber. To give this and similar models accurate applied value, more field data are needed to adequately quantify the interactions between moose and forest vegetation. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 219
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implications of a nested stochastic/deterministic bio-economic model for a pelagic fishery
    McDonald, AD
    Sandal, LK
    Steinshamn, SI
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 149 (1-2) : 193 - 201
  • [22] A Bio-Economic Model of Community Incentives for Wildlife Management Under CAMPFIRE
    Carolyn Fischer
    Edwin Muchapondwa
    Thomas Sterner
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 48 : 303 - 319
  • [23] A welfare study into capture fisheries in cirata reservoir: a bio-economic model
    Anna, Z.
    Hindayani, P.
    ASEAN-FEN INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES SYMPOSIUM - 2017, 2018, 137
  • [24] Marine reserves: A bio-economic model with asymmetric density dependent migration
    Armstrong, Claire W.
    Skonhoft, Anders
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (03) : 466 - 476
  • [25] A Bio-Economic Model of Community Incentives for Wildlife Management Under CAMPFIRE
    Fischer, Carolyn
    Muchapondwa, Edwin
    Sterner, Thomas
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02): : 303 - 319
  • [26] Optimizing land management for nitrogen reduction: A bio-economic spatial model
    Levers, L. R.
    Dalzell, B. J.
    Peterson, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 377
  • [27] Bio-economic Modelling as a Method for Determining Economic Weights for Optimal Multiple-Trait Tree Selection
    Ivkovic, M.
    Wu, H.
    Kumar, S.
    SILVAE GENETICA, 2010, 59 (2-3) : 77 - 90
  • [28] Managing mixed fisheries for bio-economic viability
    Gourguet, S.
    Macher, C.
    Doyen, L.
    Thebaud, O.
    Bertignac, M.
    Guyader, O.
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2013, 140 : 46 - 62
  • [29] A dynamic bio-economic model to simulate optimal adjustments of suckler cow farm management to production and market shocks in France
    Mosnier, C.
    Agabriel, J.
    Lherm, M.
    Reynaud, A.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2009, 102 (1-3) : 77 - 88
  • [30] A Bio-Economic Analysis of the Liberian Coastal Fisheries
    Jueseah, Alvin Slewion
    Kristofersson, Dadi Mar
    Tomasson, Tumi
    Knutsson, Ogmundur
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (23) : 1 - 20