A bio-economic model for optimal harvest of timber and moose

被引:15
|
作者
Wam, HK
Hofstad, O
Nævdal, E
Sankhayan, P
机构
[1] Agr Univ Norway, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, N-1432 As, Norway
[2] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Agr Univ Norway, Dept Econ & Resource Management, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Alces alces; bio-economic model; forest; harvest; moose; Picea abies; pine;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.062
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We present a dynamic optimization model for harvesting timber and moose when the moose inflicts costs by browsing young trees. To illustrate its behaviour, the model was run numerically for Norwegian market conditions. Optimal management in our model kept moose at an approximately 70% lower density than if managed without concern for Limber production. Further. the harvest of moose was slightly reduced around the time of timbering to take advantage of increased forage production in coming years. Thereby a fluctuating pattern in moose harvest was generated over time. The amplitude of these fluctuations depended on the productivity of the site, while the period of the fluctuations depended on the fixed costs of harvesting Limber. On a particular land, the optimal harvesting strategy for timber was determined by (i) the relationship between timber prices and fixed costs of harvesting, (ii) the relationship between prices of timber and moose, and (iii) the length of the planning period in relation to initial standing biomass of trees. Within a wide range of the present market regime. combined production of both timber and moose was the most profitable strategy. Still, for all our planning scenarios more than 90% of the income came from timber. To give this and similar models accurate applied value, more field data are needed to adequately quantify the interactions between moose and forest vegetation. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 219
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Harvest residue potential in Norway - A bio-economic model appraisal
    Bergseng, Even
    Eid, Tron
    Loken, Oivind
    Astrup, Rasmus
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2013, 28 (05) : 470 - 480
  • [2] Necessary Optimality Conditions for Fractional Bio-economic Systems: The Problem of Optimal Harvest Rate
    Filatova, D. V.
    Grzywaczewski, M.
    HUMAN-COMPUTER SYSTEMS INTERACTION: BACKGROUNDS AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 60 : 557 - +
  • [3] A viability analysis for a bio-economic model
    Béné, C
    Doyen, L
    Gabay, D
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (03) : 385 - 396
  • [4] A bio-economic model for Namibian pilchard
    Sandal, LK
    Steinshamn, SI
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 69 (02) : 299 - 318
  • [5] Oscillations, fluctuation intensity and optimal harvesting of a bio-economic model in a complex habitat
    Zhang, Xue
    Song, Shuni
    Wu, Jianhong
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 436 (02) : 692 - 717
  • [6] Taking timber browsing damage into account: A density dependant matrix model for the optimal harvest of moose in Scandinavia
    Wam, Hilde Karine
    Hofstad, Ole
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [7] The bio-economic revolution
    Carli, Don
    Print on Demand, 2002, 8 (06):
  • [8] A Regional Bio-economic Model of Nitrogen Use in Cropping
    Merel, Pierre
    Yi, Fujin
    Lee, Juhwan
    Six, Johan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 96 (01) : 67 - 91
  • [9] A bio-economic analysis of harvest control rules for the Northeast Arctic cod fishery
    Eikeset, Anne Maria
    Richter, Andries P.
    Dankel, Dorothy J.
    Dunlop, Erin S.
    Heino, Mikko
    Dieckmann, Ulf
    Stenseth, Nils Chr.
    MARINE POLICY, 2013, 39 : 172 - 181
  • [10] A bio-economic feasibility model for remote setting in Virginia
    Congrove, Michael S.
    Allen, Standish K., Jr.
    Wesson, Jim
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2008, 27 (04): : 998 - 998