Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep

被引:238
|
作者
Ruckstuhl, KE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Biol, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.1998.0745
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Like many sexually dimorphic ungulates, bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis, form sexually segregated groups. Nursery groups include females, lambs and subadult males, while adult males form bachelor groups. Previous hypotheses to account for sexual segregation in ungulates have suggested sexual differences in energy requirements, predation risk and social preferences. I tested the hypothesis that differing nutritional demands, due to sexual dimorphism in body size, would lead to different movement patterns and time budgets. If ruminating/foraging schedules differed according to body size, males and females could not synchronize their activities and therefore would segregate by sex. To test this hypothesis, I observed a population of marked bighorns. I recorded the time males and females spent lying, grazing or walking during 8-14 h of focal-animal observations. Initial and final location of groups and steps taken per minute foraging were also noted. Females spent more time foraging and walking and had longer foraging and walking bouts than adult males, but did not differ in numbers of steps taken while foraging. Males spent more time lying than females. Subadult males switched between nursery and bachelor groups and changed their foraging behaviour depending on the type of group they were in. The distance moved was on average almost four times greater for female than for male groups. I suggest that sexual difference in time budgets and movement patterns make it difficult for males and females to stay in the same,group and therefore lead to sexual segregation. (C) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 106
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LATE PARTURITION IN BIGHORN SHEEP
    STEWART, ST
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1982, 63 (01) : 154 - 155
  • [42] PORCUPINE DAMAGE TO BIGHORN SHEEP
    PULLING, AV
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1945, 9 (04): : 329 - 329
  • [43] An introduction to the restoration of bighorn sheep
    Krausman, PR
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2000, 8 (04) : 3 - 5
  • [44] Seasonality of births in bighorn sheep
    Hass, CC
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1997, 78 (04) : 1251 - 1260
  • [45] Bighorn sheep from Yakutia
    Boeskorov G.G.
    Nogovitsyn P.R.
    Tikhonov A.N.
    Solomonov N.G.
    Doklady Biological Sciences, 2011, 439 (1) : 244 - 247
  • [46] COOPERATIVE DEFENSE BY BIGHORN SHEEP
    SHANK, CC
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1977, 58 (02) : 243 - 244
  • [47] DISEASE RESEARCH IN BIGHORN SHEEP
    WARD, ACS
    AGRI-PRACTICE, 1992, 13 (03): : 31 - 31
  • [48] Sexual segregation in ungulates: individual behaviour and the missing link
    Focardi, S
    Farnsworth, K
    Poli, BM
    Ponzetta, MP
    Tinelli, A
    POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2003, 45 (02) : 83 - 95
  • [49] BIGHORN SHEEP IN WINTER - DO RAMS MAXIMIZE REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS BY SPATIAL AND HABITAT SEGREGATION FROM EWES
    GEIST, V
    PETOCZ, RG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1977, 55 (11): : 1802 - 1810
  • [50] Rut-Induced Hypophagia in Male Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goats: Foraging Under Time Budget Constraints
    Pelletier, Fanie
    Mainguy, Julien
    Cote, Steeve D.
    ETHOLOGY, 2009, 115 (02) : 141 - 151