Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Peritoneal Metastasis: A Registry Study

被引:53
|
作者
Kurtz, Florian [1 ]
Struller, Florian [1 ]
Horvath, Philipp [1 ]
Solass, Wiebke [2 ]
Boesmueller, Hans [2 ]
Koenigsrainer, Alfred [1 ]
Reymond, Marc A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Karls Eberhard Univ Tubingen, Dept Gen Surg, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Karls Eberhard Univ Tubingen, Inst Pathol, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Natl Ctr Pleura & Peritoneum, Comprehens Canc Ctr South Western Germany, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
LOW-DOSE CISPLATIN; OVARIAN-CANCER; PHARMACOKINETIC PROBLEMS; INTRAABDOMINAL PRESSURE; INNOVATIVE APPROACH; GASTRIC-CANCER; 1ST EVIDENCE; DOXORUBICIN; CARCINOMATOSIS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1155/2018/2743985
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel drug delivery system with superior pharmacological properties for treating peritoneal metastasis (PM). Safety and efficacy results of PIPAC with cisplatin/doxorubicin or oxaliplatin from a registry cohort are presented. Methods. IRB-approved registry study. Retrospective analysis. No predefined inclusion criteria, individual therapeutic recommendation by the interdisciplinary tumor board. Safety assessment with CTCAE 4.0. Histological assessment of tumor response by an independent pathologist using the 4-tied peritoneal regression grading system (PRGS). Mean PRGS and ascites volume were assessed at each PIPAC. Results. A total of 142 PIPAC procedures were scheduled in 71 consecutive patients with PM from gastric (n = 26), colorectal (n = 17), hepatobiliary/pancreatic (n = 9), ovarian (n = 6), appendiceal (n = 5) origin, pseudomyxoma peritonei (n = 4), and other tumors (n = 3). Mean age was 58 +/- 13 years. Patients were heavily pretreated. Mean PCI was 19 +/- 13. Laparoscopic nonaccess rate was 11/142 procedures (7.7%). Mean number of PIPAC/patient was 2. All patients were eligible for safety analysis. There was no procedure-related mortality. There were 2.8% intraoperative and 4.9% postoperative complications. 39 patients underwent more than one PIPAC and were eligible for efficacy analysis, and PRGS could be assessed in 36 of them. In 24 patients (67%), PRGS improved or remained unchanged at PIPAC#2, reflecting tumor regression or stable disease. Ascites was present in 24 patients and diminished significantly under therapy. Median survival was 11.8 months (95% CI: 7.45-16.2 months) from PIPAC#1. Conclusion. PIPAC is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated and can induce histological regression in a significant proportion of pretreated PM patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Establishment of a rat ovarian peritoneal metastasis model to study pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Leen Van de Sande
    Wouter Willaert
    Sarah Cosyns
    Kaat De Clercq
    Molood Shariati
    Katrien Remaut
    Wim Ceelen
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [2] Establishment of a rat ovarian peritoneal metastasis model to study pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Van de Sande, Leen
    Willaert, Wouter
    Cosyns, Sarah
    De Clercq, Kaat
    Shariati, Molood
    Remaut, Katrien
    Ceelen, Wim
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [3] Response Evaluation in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Treated with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Roensholdt, Signe
    Detlefsen, Sonke
    Mortensen, Michael Bau
    Graversen, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [4] Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Graversen, Martin
    Detlefsen, Sonke
    Bjerregaard, Jon Kroll
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Mortensen, Michael Bau
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2017, 34 (05) : 309 - 314
  • [5] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for unresectable peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer
    Alyami, Mohammad
    Bonnot, Pierre-Emmanuel
    Mercier, Frederic
    Laplace, Nathalie
    Villeneuve, Laurent
    Passot, Guillaume
    Bakrin, Naoual
    Kepenekian, Vahan
    Glehen, Olivier
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (01): : 123 - 127
  • [6] Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
    Martin Graversen
    Sönke Detlefsen
    Jon Kroll Bjerregaard
    Per Pfeiffer
    Michael Bau Mortensen
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2017, 34 : 309 - 314
  • [7] Safety and feasibility of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) associated with systemic chemotherapy: an innovative approach to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis
    Robella, Manuela
    Vaira, Marco
    De Simone, Michele
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14
  • [8] Safety and feasibility of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) associated with systemic chemotherapy: an innovative approach to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis
    Manuela Robella
    Marco Vaira
    Michele De Simone
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14
  • [9] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) of peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer: a descriptive cohort study
    S. Bremholm Ellebæk
    M. Graversen
    S. Detlefsen
    L. Lundell
    C. W. Fristrup
    P. Pfeiffer
    M. B. Mortensen
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2020, 37 : 325 - 332
  • [10] Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) of peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer: a descriptive cohort study
    Ellebaek, S. Bremholm
    Graversen, M.
    Detlefsen, S.
    Lundell, L.
    Fristrup, C. W.
    Pfeiffer, P.
    Mortensen, M. B.
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2020, 37 (02) : 325 - 332