Retrospective Evaluation of Treatment Response in Patients with Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Cancer Using CT and CA 19-9

被引:12
|
作者
Kim, Seung-Seob [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Sunyoung [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Hee Seung [3 ]
Bang, Seungmin [3 ]
Han, Kyunghwa [4 ]
Park, Mi-Suk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Res Inst Radiol Sci, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Ctr Clin Imaging Data Sci CCIDS, Res Inst Radiol Sci, Dept Radiol,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; CA19-9; DECREASE; BORDERLINE; FOLFIRINOX; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; CORRELATE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.212236
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Imaging studies have limitations in evaluating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment response. Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of combined CT and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) evaluation at 8 weeks after first-line treatment to predict overall survival (OS) of patients with nonmetastatic PDAC. Materials and Methods: Patients with nonmetastatic PDAC who received first-line treatment with either chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation in a single-center PDAC cohort registry were retrospectively enrolled in the study between January 2013 and December 2016. Follow-up CT images obtained 8 weeks after treatment were evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Patients with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were defined as CT responders, and those with progressive disease (PD) were defined as CT nonresponders. Patients with a normalized CA 19-9 level at 8-week follow-up were defined as CA 19-9 responders, and those with a nonnormalized or nonelevated CA 19-9 level were defined as CA 19-9 nonresponders. OS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with Breslow analysis. Results: A total of 197 patients (mean age +/- standard deviation, 65 years +/- 10; 107 men) were evaluated. Patients with PD (n = 17) showed shorter OS than those with SD (n = 147; P,.001) or PR (n = 33; P =.003). OS did not differ between the patients with PR and those with SD (P =.60). When the CT and CA 19-9 responses were integrated, OS was longest in CT and CA 19-9 responders (group 1, n = 27; median OS, 26.6 months [95% CI: 9.0, 44.1]), followed by CT responders but CA 19-9 nonresponders (group 2, n = 153; median OS, 15.9 months [95% CI: 13.3, 18.5]; P =.007 vs group 1) and CT and CA 19-9 nonresponders (group 3, n = 17; median OS, 6.5 months [95% CI: 0.8, 12.2]; P,.001 vs group 2). Conclusion: Integrated evaluation with CT and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 response allowed more accurate stratification of survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the early treatment period than did evaluation according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. (C) RSNA, 2022
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 556
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Limited Value of CA 19-9 in Predicting Early Treatment Failure in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Vormittag, Laurenz
    Gleiss, Andreas
    Scheithauer, Werner
    Lang, Fritz
    Laengle, Friedrich
    Kornek, Gabriela V.
    ONCOLOGY, 2009, 77 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [22] CA 19-9 level predicts response to GTX chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.
    Fogelman, DR
    Schreibman, SM
    Fine, RL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 359S - 359S
  • [23] THE SEROLOGIC MARKER CA 19-9 AND PANCREATIC-CANCER
    NARDONE, DA
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 111 (02) : 184 - 185
  • [24] CA 19-9 serum course and prognosis of pancreatic cancer
    Safi, F
    Schlosser, W
    Falkenreck, S
    Beger, HG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY, 1996, 20 (03) : 155 - 161
  • [25] CA 19-9 in pancreatic cancer - from diagnosis to therapy
    Rainer, Klapdor
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2006, 27 : 19 - 19
  • [26] CA 19-9 and Lewis Antigens in Pancreatic Cancer Reply
    Berger, Adam C.
    Hoffman, John P.
    Winter, Kathryn
    Regine, William
    Safran, Howard
    Abrams, Ross
    Willet, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15) : 2573 - 2573
  • [27] EVALUATION OF CA 19-9 AS A SERUM TUMOR-MARKER IN PANCREATIC-CANCER
    HAGLUND, C
    ROBERTS, PJ
    KUUSELA, P
    SCHEININ, TM
    MAKELA, O
    JALANKO, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1986, 53 (02) : 197 - 202
  • [28] CA 19-9 Response A Surrogate to Predict Survival in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Diaz, Celso L.
    Cinar, Pelin
    Hwang, Jimmy
    Ko, Andrew H.
    Tempero, Margaret A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 42 (12): : 898 - 902
  • [29] Role of CA 19-9 As a Prognosis Factor Before and After Pancreatic Cancer Treatment
    Kim, Youn Joo
    Park, Joo Kyung
    Yang, Ki Young
    Seo, Jeong Kyun
    Kim, Yong-Tae
    Yoon, Yong Bum
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A390 - A390
  • [30] CA 19-9 as a predictor of response and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin based chemotherapy
    Heilbrun, L. K.
    Khanna, A.
    Venkatramanamoorthy, R.
    Shields, A. F.
    Philip, P. A.
    Zalupski, M. M.
    El-Rayes, B. F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)