Training model for laparoscopic Heller and Dor fundoplication: a tool for laparoscopic skills training and assessment-construct validity using the GOALS score

被引:6
|
作者
Bellorin, Omar [1 ]
Kundel, Anna [2 ]
Sharma, Saurabh [1 ]
Ramirez-Valderrama, Alexander [1 ]
Lee, Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] New York Presbyterian Queens Weill Cornell Med Co, Dept Gen Surg, 5645 Main St, Flushing, NY 11355 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Endocrine Surg, Langone Med Ctr, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] New York Presbyterian Queens Weill Cornell Med Co, Dept Thorac Surg, 5645 Main St, Flushing, NY 11355 USA
关键词
Laparoscopy; Surgical training; Heller-Dor myotomy; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BILE-DUCT EXPLORATION; PORCINE MODEL; SURGERY; SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-015-4617-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic training demands practice. The transfer of laparoscopic skills from training models to real surgical procedures has been proven. The global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) score is a 5-item global rating scale developed to evaluate laparoscopic skills by direct observation. This scale has been used to demonstrate construct validity of several laparoscopic training models. Here, we present a low-cost model of laparoscopic Heller-Dor for advanced laparoscopic training. The aim of this study was to determine the capability of a training model for laparoscopic Heller-Dor to discriminate between different levels of laparoscopic expertise. The performance of two groups with different levels of expertise, novices (< 30 laparoscopic procedures PGY1-2) and experts (> 300 laparoscopic procedures PGY4-5) was assessed. All participants were instructed to perform two tasks (esophageal myotomy and fundoplication). All the performances were recorded in a digital format. A laparoscopic expert who was blinded to subject's identity evaluated the recordings using the GOALS score. Autonomy, one of the five items of GOALS, was removed since the evaluator and the trainee did not have interaction. The time required to finish each task was also recorded. Performance was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05 was significant). Twenty subjects were evaluated: ten in each group, using the GOALS score. The mean total GOALS score for novices was 7.5 points (SD: 1.64) and 13.9 points (SD: 1.66) for experts (p < 0.05).The expert group was superior in each domain of the GOALS score compared to novices: depth perception (mean: 3.3 vs 2 p < 0.05), bimanual dexterity (mean 3.4 vs 2.1 p < 0.05), efficiency (mean 3.4 vs 1.7 p < 0.05) and tissue handling (mean 3.6 vs 1.7 p < 0.05). With regard to time, experts were superior in task 1 (mean 9.7 vs 14.9 min p < 0.05) and task 2 (mean 24 vs 47.1 min p < 0.05) compared to novices. The laparoscopic Heller-Dor training model has construct validity. The model may be used as a tool for training of the surgical resident.
引用
收藏
页码:3654 / 3660
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with achalasia who underwent laparoscopic Heller-myotomy with Dor-fundoplication
    Fukushima, Naoko
    Masuda, Takahiro
    Tsuboi, Kazuto
    Hoshino, Masato
    Takahashi, Keita
    Yuda, Masami
    Sakashita, Yuki
    Takeuchi, Hideyuki
    Omura, Nobuo
    Yano, Fumiaki
    Eto, Ken
    [J]. ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 21 (03) : 374 - 382
  • [32] Validity and Reliability of Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) in Novice Trainees Performing a Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Kramp, Kelvin H.
    van Det, Marc J.
    Hoff, Christiaan
    Lamme, Bas
    Veeger, Nic J. G. M.
    Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 72 (02) : 351 - 358
  • [33] Assessment of laparoscopic skills before and after simulation training with a canine abdominal model
    Fransson, Boel A.
    Ragle, Claude A.
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 236 (10): : 1079 - 1084
  • [34] A valid model for testing and training laparoscopic psychomotor skills
    Campo, Rudi
    Reising, Christoph
    Van Belle, Yves
    Nassif, Joseph
    O'Donovan, Peter
    Molinas, Carlos Roger
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2010, 7 (02) : 133 - 141
  • [35] Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence
    Conor Toale
    Marie Morris
    Dara O. Kavanagh
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 1658 - 1671
  • [36] Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence
    Toale, Conor
    Morris, Marie
    Kavanagh, Dara O.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (03): : 1658 - 1671
  • [37] Subjective and construct validity and learning curve for LAPPLATE®: electronic device for laparoscopic training
    Sanchez Hurtado, M. A.
    Perez Lopez, M. M.
    Sanchez Margallo, F. M.
    Diaz-Guemes Martin-Portugues, I.
    Moyano Cuevas, J. L.
    Enciso Sanz, S.
    Sanchez Peralta, L. F.
    Uson Gargallo, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 12 - 12
  • [38] Self-assessment in laparoscopic surgical skills training: Is it reliable?
    Ganni, Sandeep
    Chmarra, Magdalena K.
    Goossens, Richard H. M.
    Jakimowicz, Jack J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (06): : 2451 - 2456
  • [39] Assessment of the laparoscopic skills acquired by training on a virtual reality simulator
    Lucas, Steven M.
    Zeltser, Ilia S.
    Bensalah, Karim
    Tuncel, Altug
    Jenkins, Adam
    Raman, Jay D.
    Pearle, Margaret S.
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 658 - 658
  • [40] Self-assessment in laparoscopic surgical skills training: Is it reliable?
    Sandeep Ganni
    Magdalena K. Chmarra
    Richard H. M. Goossens
    Jack J. Jakimowicz
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 2451 - 2456