Game form recognition in preference elicitation, cognitive abilities, and cognitive load *

被引:4
|
作者
Drichoutis, Andreas C. [1 ]
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Athens, Sch Appl Econ & Social Sci, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Iera Odos 7511855, Greece
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Econ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Game form recognition; Game form misconception; Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism; First price auction; Preference elicitation; Cognitive load; Cognitive resources; Raven test; Fluid intelligence; DEGROOT-MARSCHAK MECHANISM; LOSS AVERSION; INTELLIGENCE; AUCTIONS; FAILURE; CHOICE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2021.11.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study further examines the failure of game form recognition in preference elicita-tion (Cason and Plott, 2014) by making elicitation more cognitively demanding through a cognitive load manipulation. We hypothesized that if subjects misperceive one game for another game, then by depleting their cognitive resources, subjects would misconceive the more-cognitively demanding task for the less-cognitively demanding task at a higher rate. We find no evidence that subjects suffer from a first-price-auction game-form misconcep-tion, but once cognitive resources are depleted, subjects' choices are better explained by random choice. More cognitively able subjects are more immune to deviations from sub-optimal play than lower cognitively able subjects. Moreover, we find no support for partial game form recognition. Our results are robust to the integration of risk preferences in the analysis. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 65
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring Cognitive Abilities in the Wild: Validating a Population-Scale Game-Based Cognitive Assessment
    Pedersen, Mads Kock
    Diaz, Carlos Mauricio Castano
    Wang, Qian Janice
    Alba-Marrugo, Mario Alejandro
    Amidi, Ali
    Basaiawmoit, Rajiv V.
    Bergenholtz, Carsten
    Christiansen, Morten H.
    Gajdacz, Miroslav
    Hertwig, Ralph
    Ishkhanyan, Byurakn
    Klyver, Kim
    Ladegaard, Nicolai
    Mathiasen, Kim
    Parsons, Christine
    Rafner, Janet
    Villadsen, Anders R.
    Wallentin, Mikkel
    Zana, Blanka
    Sherson, Jacob F.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2023, 47 (06)
  • [22] The Affect Heuristic and Risk Perception - Stability Across Elicitation Methods and Individual Cognitive Abilities
    Skagerlund, Kenny
    Forsblad, Mattias
    Slovic, Paul
    Vastfjall, Daniel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [23] Coevolution of cognitive abilities and identity signals in individual recognition systems
    Miller, Sara E.
    Sheehan, Michael J.
    Reeve, H. Kern
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 375 (1802)
  • [24] EXPANSE: A novel narrative serious game for the behavioral assessment of cognitive abilities
    Chicchi Giglioli, Irene Alice
    de Juan Ripoll, Carla
    Parra, Elena
    Alcaniz Raya, Mariano
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (11):
  • [25] Misconceptions and Game Form Recognition: Challenges to Theories of Revealed Preference and Framing
    Cason, Timothy N.
    Plott, Charles R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2014, 122 (06) : 1235 - 1270
  • [26] Measuring Cognitive Load Using In-Game Metrics of a Serious Simulation Game
    Sevcenko, Natalia
    Ninaus, Manuel
    Wortha, Franz
    Moeller, Korbinian
    Gerjets, Peter
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [27] What is it that Cognitive Abilities are Abilities to Do?
    Alan Millar
    [J]. Acta Analytica, 2009, 24 : 223 - 236
  • [28] COGNITIVE ABILITIES OF MUSICIANS
    Giovagnoli, A. R.
    Raglio, A.
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2011, 113 (02) : 563 - 569
  • [29] Inherited cognitive abilities
    不详
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1997, 157 (03) : 241 - 241
  • [30] COGNITIVE-ABILITIES
    BRODY, N
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (02) : 63 - &