Acidifier as an alternative material to antibiotics in animal feed

被引:87
|
作者
Kim, YY [1 ]
Kil, DY [1 ]
Oh, HK [1 ]
Han, IK [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Agr Biotechnol, Seoul 151921, South Korea
来源
关键词
acidifier; gastric pH; weaning pig; antibiotics;
D O I
10.5713/ajas.2005.1048
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Dietary acidifiers appear to be a possible alternative to feed antibiotics in order to improve performance of weaning pigs. It is generally known that dietary acidifiers lower gastric pH, resulting in increased activity of proteolytic enzymes, improved protein digestibility and inhibiting the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria in GI tract. It is also hypothesized that acidifers could be related to reduction of gastric emptying rate, energy source in intestine, chelation of minerals, stimulation of digestive enzymes and intermediate metabolism. However, the exact mode of action still remains questionable. Organic acidifiers have been widely used for weaning pigs' diets for decades and most common organic acidifiers contain fumaric, citric, formic and/or lactic acid. Many researchers have observed that dietary acidifier supplementation improved growth performance and health status in weaning pigs. Recently inorganic acidifiers as well as organic acidifiers have drawn much attention due to improving performance of weaning pigs with a low cost. Several researchers introduced the use of salt form of acidifiers because of convenient application and better effects than pure state acids. However, considerable variations in results of acidifier supplementation have been reported in response of weaning pigs. The inconsistent responses to dietary acidifiers could be explained by feed palatability, sources and composition of diet, supplementation level of acidifier and age of animals.
引用
收藏
页码:1048 / 1060
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Iron carbide - An alternative feed material for steelmaking
    Hull, J
    [J]. IRONMAKING RESOURCES AND RESERVES ESTIMATION, 1997, (05): : 37 - 40
  • [32] ANTIBIOTICS IN ANIMAL FEED Ban routine use of critically important antibiotics in food animals
    Collignon, Peter
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [33] Can anthocyanins replace antibiotics in food and animal feed? A review
    Guo, Fanghua
    Shahidi, Fereidoon
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 143
  • [34] AIRBORNE CONTACT-DERMATITIS FROM ANIMAL FEED ANTIBIOTICS
    GUERRA, L
    VENTURO, N
    TARDIO, M
    TOSTI, A
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1991, 25 (05) : 333 - 334
  • [35] New move to rid animal feed additives of key antibiotics
    Fox, JL
    [J]. ASM NEWS, 2005, 71 (06): : 269 - 270
  • [36] ANTIBIOTICS MAY STAY IN UNITED-STATES ANIMAL FEED
    不详
    [J]. NATURE, 1978, 274 (5672) : 632 - 632
  • [37] UPDATE ON THE ANIMAL FEED ANTIBIOTICS - BACTERIAL-RESISTANCE ISSUE
    FRAPPAOLO, PJ
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1986, 191 : 2 - AGFD
  • [38] Azolla processing technologies for an alternative feed raw material
    Paryanto, P.
    Faizin, M.
    Rusnaldy, R.
    [J]. RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 19
  • [39] Antibiotics in horticulture and antibiotic feed additives in animal husbandry, Austria 2002
    Allerberger, F
    Fida, P
    Grossgut, R
    Schönbauer, M
    Würzner, H
    [J]. WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2003, 115 (17-18) : 615 - 617
  • [40] Antibiotics in horticulture and antibiotic feed additives in animal husbandry, Austria 2002
    Franz Allerberger
    Peter Fida
    Roland Grossgut
    Michael Schönbauer
    Herbert Würzner
    [J]. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 2003, 115 : 615 - 617