Validity and Equivalence of the Portuguese Version of the Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Maranhao Neto, Geraldo de Albuquerque [1 ,2 ]
Ponce de Leon, Antonio Carlos [1 ]
Veras Farinatti, Paulo de Tarso [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Inst Social Med, Dept Epidemiol, BR-20550011 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Inst Educ Fis & Desportos, Lab Atividade Fis & Promocao Saude, BR-20550011 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Salgado de Oliveira, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Atividade Fis, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Validity of tests; physical fitness; exercise test; cardiovascular diseases; CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS; FUNCTIONAL-CAPACITY; EXERCISE CAPACITY; MEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ) has been used to individualize exercise testing (ET) and to indirectly assess cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in epidemiological studies. Nevertheless, there is no validated Portuguese version. Objective: To verify the criterion-related validity and the measurement equivalence of a Portuguese version of VSAQ in 95 individuals, 8 women (aged 69 +/- 7 years) referred to ET. Methods: The subjects performed a cardiopulmonary test with incremental to maximal exercise on a cycle ergometer. The correlation between VSAQ score and Maximum Measured and Estimated METs was compared to results from other studies. The VSAQ Nomogram was calculated and its results were compared to CRF real values by linear regression. Limits of concordance and mean differences (biases) were assessed according to the Bland Altman methodology. Results: The VSAQ scores were significantly correlated to the Measured METs (r = 0.64) and Estimated METs (r = 0.67), results that were equivalent to those obtained by the original versions. The VSAQ Nomogram presented multiple R of 0.78 (Measured MET) and 0.80 (Estimated MET). However, the Nomogram seems to have underestimated CRF values greater than 6 METs. Conclusion: The VSAQ version confirmed its validity and equivalence to the original version, especially when evaluating individuals with coronary heart disease and older adults. (Arq Bras Cardiol 2011; 97(2) : 130-135)
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 135
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity questionnaire
    Silva, Anabela G.
    Queirs, Alexandra
    Alvarelhao, Joaquim
    Rocha, Nelson P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 21 (10): : 469 - 474
  • [2] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A PORTUGUESE VERSION OF THE ANIMATED ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE (AAQ)
    Nascimento, Clarissa
    Ribeiro, Icaro
    Peter, Wilfred F.
    Bastone, Alessandra
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 : 1460 - 1460
  • [3] Reliability and validity of Portuguese version of the Pain Impact Questionnaire
    Cavalheiro, Luis
    Gil, Joao N.
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    Pacheco, Paula
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 123 - 123
  • [4] Validity study of Portuguese version of Cancer Coping Questionnaire
    Torres, Ana
    Pereira, Anabela
    Monteiro, Sara
    [J]. REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE DIAGNOSTICO Y EVALUACION-E AVALIACAO PSICOLOGICA, 2014, 2 (38): : 199 - 220
  • [5] Reliability and Validity of the European Portuguese Version of the Social Touch Questionnaire
    Vieira, Ana Isabel
    Ramos, Ana Vanessa
    Cavalheiro, Luis Manuel
    Almeida, Patricia
    Nogueira, Dalia
    Reis, Elisabeth
    Nunes, Maria Vania
    Castro-Caldas, Alexandre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2016, 40 (04) : 363 - 377
  • [6] Reliability and Validity of the European Portuguese Version of the Social Touch Questionnaire
    Ana Isabel Vieira
    Ana Vanessa Ramos
    Luís Manuel Cavalheiro
    Patrícia Almeida
    Dália Nogueira
    Elisabeth Reis
    Maria Vânia Nunes
    Alexandre Castro-Caldas
    [J]. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 2016, 40 : 363 - 377
  • [7] Reliability and Construct Validity of the Portuguese Version of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire
    Antunes, Ana Cristina
    Caetano, Antonio
    Pina e Cunha, Miguel
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2017, 120 (03) : 520 - 536
  • [8] Validity evidence of the portuguese version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire
    Ramos, Alexandre
    Rosado, Antonio
    Serpa, Sidonio
    Cangas, Adolfo
    Gallego, Jose
    Ramos, Luis
    [J]. REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA DEL DEPORTE, 2018, 27 (02): : 87 - 97
  • [9] Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire
    Campos, J. A. D. B.
    Carrascosa, A. C.
    Maroco, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 39 (05) : 377 - 383
  • [10] Recovery Experience Questionnaire: validity evidence of the Brazilian-Portuguese version
    Perez-Nebra, Amalia Raquel
    Pedersoli, Mariana Martins
    Rodrigues, Aylla
    Rodrigues, Carlos Manoel Lopes
    Queiroga, Fabiana
    [J]. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2023, 28 (11): : 3383 - 3394