Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver: Sequence Optimization and Artifacts

被引：24

作者：

Wile, Geoffrey E. ^{[1
]}

Leyendecker, John R. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Body Imaging Sect, Dept Radiol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA

[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Abdominal Imaging Sect, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA

来源：

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA | 2010年 / 18卷 / 03期

关键词：

Liver; Imaging artifacts; Sequence optimization; 1.5-T imaging protocol; FAST SPIN-ECHO; GD-EOB-DTPA; HYPERVASCULAR HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA; BREATH-HOLD EXAMINATION; T2-WEIGHTED MR-IMAGES; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; PHASE DYNAMIC MRI; ARTERIAL-PHASE; GADOXETIC ACID;

D O I：

10.1016/j.mric.2010.07.010

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

The liver is one of the most challenging organs of the body to image with magnetic resonance because it is large and mobile, receives a dual blood supply, and is surrounded by organs and structures that contribute to artifacts from flow and susceptibility. Recent advances in imaging hardware, in addition to improvements in temporal resolution and development of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents, make imaging of the liver more approachable than in the past; however, it remains a complex process that requires compromise. In this article the authors discuss development and optimization of a liver imaging protocol at 1.5 T, with common variations in each element of the protocol, as well as the strengths and weaknesses associated with the relevant sequences.

引用

页码：525 / +

页数：24

共 50 条

[21] Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Calculation of the magnetic field disturbances
Balac, S
Caloz, G
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1996, 32 (03) : 1645 - 1648
[22] Effect of field strength on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging
Lufkin, R.B., 1600, (14):
[23] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING ARTIFACTS INDUCED BY OCULAR PROSTHESIS
FRY, CL
HAIK, BG
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 118 (02) : 262 - 263
[24] INTRACRANIAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING ARTIFACTS AND PSEUDOLESIONS IN DOGS AND CATS
Cooper, Jocelyn J.
Young, Benjamin D.
Hoffman, Anton
Bratton, Gerald
Hicks, Daniel G.
Tidwell, Amy
Levine, Jonathan M.
VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2010, 51 (06) : 587 - 595
[25] Managing Postoperative Artifacts on Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Buckwalter, Kenneth A.
Lin, Chen
Ford, Jason M.
SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 15 (04) : 309 - 319
[26] SUPPRESSION OF RESPIRATORY MOTION ARTIFACTS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
WOOD, ML
HENKELMAN, RM
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 13 (06) : 794 - 805
[27] ELIMINATION OF OBLIQUE FLOW ARTIFACTS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
FRANK, LR
CRAWLEY, AP
BUXTON, RB
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 25 (02) : 299 - 307
[28] Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging
Shafiei, F
Honda, E
Takahashi, H
Sasaki, T
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 (08) : 602 - 606
[29] Magnetic resonance imaging of iatrogeny: understanding imaging artifacts related to medical devices
Fowler, Kathryn J.
Maxwell, Jeffry
Saad, Nael E.
Yano, Motoyo
Raptis, Constantine
Menias, Christine
Narra, Vamsi
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2014, 39 (02): : 411 - 423
[30] Fetal magnetic resonance imaging artifacts: role of deep learning to improve imaging
Werner, H.
Santos, I. Felix
Giraldi, G. A.
Lopes, J.
Ribeiro, G.
Lopes, F. P.
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 (02) : 302 - 303

← 1 2 3 4 5 →