Preventive health counselling during antenatal care using the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS) in Ireland

被引:6
|
作者
Murphy, Marion [1 ]
McHugh, Sheena [2 ]
O'Keeffe, Linda M. [3 ]
Greene, Richard A. [1 ,4 ]
Corcoran, Paul [4 ]
Kearney, Patricia M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Med, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Cork, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Western Gateway Bldg, Cork, Ireland
[3] Univ Bristol, MRC Integrat Epidemiol Unit, Bristol Med Sch, Oakfield House, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[4] Cork Univ, Matern Hosp, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Ctr, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Lifestyle; Pregnancy; Antenatal; Public health; women's health; GESTATIONAL WEIGHT-GAIN; WOMEN; OVERWEIGHT; ADVICE;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-020-2756-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Maternal behaviours during pregnancy have short- and long-term consequences for maternal and infant health. Pregnancy is an ideal opportunity to encourage positive behaviour change. Despite this, limited information exists about the nature and content of lifestyle advice provided by healthcare professionals during antenatal care. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Ireland is based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed PRAMS that monitors maternal behaviours and experiences before, during and after pregnancy. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of preventive health counselling during pregnancy. Methods Secondary data analysis of the PRAMS Ireland study. Using hospital discharge records, a sampling frame of 2424 mother-infant pairs was used to alternately sample 1212 women whom had recently given birth. Preventive health counselling was defined as advice during antenatal care on smoking, alcohol, infant feeding and weight gain. Self-reported maternal behaviours (smoking/alcohol cessation, gestational weight gain, infant feeding). Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, adjusting for maternal characteristics. Results Among 718 women (61% response rate), the reported counselling rates were 84.8% for breastfeeding (n = 592), 48.4% for alcohol (n = 338), 47.6% for smoking (n = 333) and 31.5% for weight gain (n = 218). Women who smoked pre-pregnancy (23.7%, n = 170) were more likely to receive counselling on its effects compared to non-smokers (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 2.72 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.84-4.02)). In contrast, women who did not breastfeed (AOR 0.74, 95%CI 0.44-1.26) and those who reported alcohol consumption pre-pregnancy (AOR 0.94, 95%CI 0.64-1.37) were not more likely to receive counselling on these topics. Conclusion Pregnancy is an ideal opportunity to encourage positive behaviour change. Preventive health counselling during pregnancy is not routinely provided and rates vary widely depending on the health behaviour. This study suggests that additional strategies are needed to promote positive behaviour before and during the unique opportunity provided by pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adolescent Pregnancy and Smoking in West Virginia: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2005-2010
    Ahmadi-Montecalvo, Halima
    Haile, Zelalem Teka
    Umer, Amna
    Chertok, Ilana R. Azulay
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2016, 20 (12) : 2465 - 2473
  • [22] Maternity Care Practices and Breastfeeding Experiences of Women in Different Racial and Ethnic Groups: Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (PRAMS)
    Ahluwalia, Indu B.
    Morrow, Brian
    D'Angelo, Denise
    Li, Ruowei
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2012, 16 (08) : 1672 - 1678
  • [23] Correlates of Early Prenatal Care Access among US Women: Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)
    Krukowski, Rebecca A.
    Jacobson, Lisette T.
    John, Jemima
    Kinser, Patricia
    Campbell, Kendra
    Ledoux, Tracey
    Gavin, Kara L.
    Chiu, Chi-Yang
    Wang, Jiajang
    Kruper, Abbey
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2022, 26 (02) : 328 - 341
  • [24] Incarceration Exposure and Maternal Food Insecurity During Pregnancy: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2004-2015
    Testa, Alexander
    Jackson, Dylan B.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 24 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [25] Maternity Care Practices and Breastfeeding Experiences of Women in Different Racial and Ethnic Groups: Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (PRAMS)
    Indu B. Ahluwalia
    Brian Morrow
    Denise D’Angelo
    Ruowei Li
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2012, 16 : 1672 - 1678
  • [26] DIABETES AND BREASTFEEDING AMONG HIGH BMI REPRODUCTIVE AGE WOMEN USING THE PREGNANCY RISK ASSESSMENT MONITORING SYSTEM (PRAMS)
    Jacobson, Lisette T.
    Haag, Lauren
    Zackula, Rosalee E.
    Okut, Hayrettin
    Lucas, Meredith
    John, Jemima
    Grainger, David A.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 55 : S147 - S147
  • [27] Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Ireland: Methods and Response Rates
    Linda M. O’Keeffe
    Patricia M. Kearney
    Richard A. Greene
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2015, 19 : 480 - 486
  • [28] Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Ireland: Methods and Response Rates
    O'Keeffe, Linda M.
    Kearney, Patricia M.
    Greene, Richard A.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 19 (03) : 480 - 486
  • [29] The association between maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in the United States: Pregnancy risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)
    Xie, Shuai
    Monteiro, Karine
    Gjelsvik, Annie
    VACCINE, 2023, 41 (13) : 2300 - 2306
  • [30] Racial disparities in death of someone close during pregnancy: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2017-2021
    Woodward, Krista P.
    Testa, Alexander
    Jackson, Dylan B.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 97 : 16 - 22