EEG and MEG coherence: Measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics

被引:375
|
作者
Srinivasan, Ramesh [1 ]
Winter, William R.
Ding, Jian
Nunez, Paul L.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Brain Phys LLC, Covington, LA 70433 USA
关键词
coherence; synchrony; volume conduction; EEG; MEG; Laplacian;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.026
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We contrasted coherence estimates obtained with EEG, Laplacian, and MEG measures of synaptic activity using simulations with head models and simultaneous recordings of EEG and MEG. EEG coherence is often used to assess functional connectivity in human cortex. However, moderate to large EEG coherence can also arise simply by the volume conduction of current through the tissues of the head. We estimated this effect using simulated brain sources and a model of head tissues (cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), skull, and scalp) derived front MRI. We found that volume conduction can elevate EEG coherence at all frequencies for moderately separated (<10 cm) electrodes; a smaller levation is observed with widely separated (>20 cm) electrodes. This Volume conduction effect was readily observed in experimental EEG at high frequencies (40-50 Hz). Cortical sources generating spontaneous EEG in this band are apparently uncorrelated. In contrast, lower frequency EEG coherence appears to result from a mixture of volume conduction effects and genuine source coherence. Surface Laplacian EEG methods minimize the effect of volume conduction on coherence estimates by emphasizing sources at smaller spatial scales than unprocessed potentials (EEG). MEG coherence estimates are inflated at all frequencies by the field spread across the large distance between sources and sensors. This effect is most apparent at sensors separated by less than 15 cm in tangential directions along a surface passing through the sensors. In comparison to long-range (>20 cm) volume conduction effects in EEG, widely spaced MEG sensors show smaller field-spread effects, which is a potentially significant advantage. However, MEG coherence estimates reflect fewer sources at a smaller scale than EEG coherence and may only partially overlap EEG coherence. EEG, Laplacian, and MEG coherence emphasize different spatial scales and orientations of sources. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 52
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electrocorticography and stereo EEG provide distinct measures of brain connectivity: implications for network models
    Bernabei, John M.
    Arnold, T. Campbell
    Shah, Preya
    Revell, Andrew
    Ong, Ian Z.
    Kini, Lohith G.
    Stein, Joel M.
    Shinohara, Russell T.
    Lucas, Timothy H.
    Davis, Kathryn A.
    Bassett, Danielle S.
    Litt, Brian
    BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 3 (03)
  • [42] Coherence-based correntropy spectral density: A novel coherence measure for functional connectivity of EEG signals
    Bakhshali, Mohamad Amin
    Ebrahimi-Moghadam, Abbas
    Khademi, Morteza
    Moghimi, Sahar
    MEASUREMENT, 2019, 140 : 354 - 364
  • [43] EEG functional connectivity metrics wPLI and wSMI account for distinct types of brain functional interactions
    Imperatori, Laura Sophie
    Betta, Monica
    Cecchetti, Luca
    Canales-Johnson, Andres
    Ricciardi, Emiliano
    Siclari, Francesca
    Pietrini, Pietro
    Chennu, Srivas
    Bernardi, Giulio
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [44] EEG functional connectivity metrics wPLI and wSMI account for distinct types of brain functional interactions
    Laura Sophie Imperatori
    Monica Betta
    Luca Cecchetti
    Andrés Canales-Johnson
    Emiliano Ricciardi
    Francesca Siclari
    Pietro Pietrini
    Srivas Chennu
    Giulio Bernardi
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [45] Tracking spatial dynamics of functional connectivity during a task
    Wu, Lei
    Caprihan, Arvind
    Calhoun, Vince
    NEUROIMAGE, 2021, 239
  • [46] Tracking dynamic brain networks using high temporal resolution MEG measures of functional connectivity
    Tewarie, Prejaas
    Liuzzi, Lucrezia
    O'Neill, George C.
    Quinn, Andrew J.
    Griffa, Alessandra
    Woolrich, Mark W.
    Stam, Cornelis J.
    Hillebrand, Arjan
    Brookes, Matthew J.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 200 : 38 - 50
  • [47] Psychotic disorders, dopaminergic agents and EEG/MEG resting-state functional connectivity: A systematic review
    Mackintosh, Amatya Johanna
    de Bock, Renate
    Lim, Zehwi
    Trulley, Valerie-Noelle
    Schmidt, Andre
    Borgwardt, Stefan
    Andreou, Christina
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2021, 120 : 354 - 371
  • [48] Benchmarking metrics for inferring functional connectivity from multi-channel EEG and MEG: A simulation study
    Yu, Meichen
    CHAOS, 2020, 30 (12)
  • [49] ROBUST METHODS FOR RECONSTRUCTING BRAIN ACTIVITY AND FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN BRAIN SOURCES WITH MEG/EEG DATA
    Owen, Julia P.
    Wipf, David P.
    Attias, Hagai T.
    Sekihara, Kensuke
    Nagarajan, Srikantan S.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 1271 - +
  • [50] Healthy ageing and cognitive impairment alter EEG functional connectivity in distinct frequency bands
    Kumar, Wupadrasta Santosh
    Ray, Supratim
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (06) : 3432 - 3449