AAPT Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Painful Temporomandibular Disorders

被引:29
|
作者
Ohrbach, Richard [1 ]
Dworkin, Samuel F. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Oral Diagnost Sci, Buffalo, NY USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Oral Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Oral Med, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN | 2019年 / 20卷 / 11期
关键词
Pain; TMD; taxonomy; biopsychosocial; EMPIRICALLY IDENTIFIED DOMAINS; TMD DESCRIPTIVE DATA; AXIS I; OROFACIAL PAIN; RISK-FACTORS; EXAMINER RELIABILITY; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; VALIDITY; RDC/TMD; HEADACHE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2019.04.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The classification of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) has progressed substantially over the past 25 years owing to the strategic implementation of an initial classification system based on core taxonomic principles. In this article, we describe the development of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and its translation into the multidimensional Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations Innovations Opportunities and Networks AAPT for chronic pain disorders. The initial scientific classification system (Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders) relied on a boot-strapping process that did not attempt to solve all known clinical problems but, rather, focused on problems that could be solved at that time. The core design principles included using epidemiologic data, operationalized concepts, reliable methods, and the incorporation of the biopsychosocial model into a dual axis system. This system led to sufficient data collection internationally that the system itself could be revised, first by critical evaluation of all aspects, second by review from invited experts, and third by the construction of a revised taxonomy (DC/TMD) that maintained the core design principles of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. The resultant disorders with pain as a dominant feature exhibit substantial sensitivity and specificity, and they have been translated into the AAPT framework. The AAPT TMD criteria are part of an evidence-based classification system providing a systematic structure that includes 5 dimensions: diagnostic criteria, common features, comorbidities, consequences, and putative mechanisms. Future research will attempt to extend this AAPT domain from solely TMDs to include other orofacial pain conditions. Perspective: The painful TMDs have well-established sensitivity and specificity, as based on the DC/TMD; their translation to the AAPT framework for chronic pain conditions provides a structure for consistent clinical application within the broader health care settings and for future research on the TMDs. (C) 2019 by the American Pain Society
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1292
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Psychosocial and Somatosensory Factors in Women with Chronic Migraine and Painful Temporomandibular Disorders
    Gil-Martinez, Alfonso
    Grande-Alonso, Monica
    La Touche, Roy
    Lara-Lara, Manuel
    Lopez-Lopez, Almudena
    Fernandez-Carnero, Josue
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 2016
  • [32] Multisystem Dysregulation in Painful Temporomandibular Disorders
    Chen, Hong
    Nackley, Andrea
    Miller, Vanessa
    Diatchenko, Luda
    Maixner, William
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 14 (09): : 983 - 996
  • [33] DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF PAINFUL TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS
    CLARK, GT
    DENTAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1987, 31 (04) : 645 - 674
  • [34] Validation of the clinical diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders for the diagnostic subgroup -: disc derangement with reduction
    Emshoff, R
    Brandlmaier, I
    Bösch, R
    Gerhard, S
    Rudisch, A
    Bertram, S
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 29 (12) : 1139 - 1145
  • [35] Validation of the clinical diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders for the diagnostic subgroup of degenerative joint disease
    Brandlmaier, I
    Grüner, S
    Rudisch, A
    Bertram, S
    Emshoff, R
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 30 (04) : 401 - 406
  • [36] The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. VI: Future Directions
    Anderson, Gary C.
    Gonzalez, Yoly M.
    Ohrbach, Richard
    Truelove, Edmond L.
    Sommers, Earl
    Look, John O.
    Schiffman, Eric L.
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL PAIN, 2010, 24 (01): : 79 - 88
  • [37] Validity of Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Joint Disorder in the Diagnosis of Disc Displacement Disorders of Temporomandibular Joint
    Goyal, Shikha N.
    Karjodkar, Freny R.
    Sansare, Kaustubh
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2020, 11 (04) : 332 - 335
  • [38] Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Polish assessment instruments
    Osiewicz, Magdalena
    Ciapala, Bartosz
    Bolt, Katarzyna
    Kolodziej, Piotr
    Wieckiewicz, Mieszko
    Ohrbach, Richard
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2024, 61 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [39] Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: current status & future relevance
    Dworkin, S. F.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 37 (10) : 734 - 743
  • [40] Executive summary of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for clinical and research applications
    Schiffman, Eric
    Ohrbach, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 147 (06): : 438 - 445