Re-evaluating the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in reward and reinforcement

被引:134
|
作者
Noonan, M. P. [1 ,2 ]
Kolling, N. [1 ,2 ]
Walton, M. E. [1 ,2 ]
Rushworth, M. F. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Decis & Act Lab, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[2] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Ctr Funct Magnet Resonance Imaging Brain, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
orbitofrontal cortex; reinforcement; reward; value assignment; value comparison; ORBITAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; VISUAL OBJECT-DISCRIMINATION; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; SENSORY-SPECIFIC SATIETY; DECISION-MAKING; MACAQUE MONKEYS; HUMAN BRAIN; FRONTAL-CORTEX; RHESUS-MONKEYS; DISTINCT ROLES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08023.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The orbitofrontal cortex and adjacent ventromedial prefrontal cortex carry reward representations and mediate flexible behaviour when circumstances change. Here we review how recent experiments in humans and macaques have confirmed the existence of a major difference between the functions of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and adjacent medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC) on the one hand and the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) on the other. These differences, however, may not be best accounted for in terms of specializations for reward and error/punishment processing as is commonly assumed. Instead we argue that both lesion and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies reveal that the lOFC is concerned with the assignment of credit for both reward and error outcomes to the choice of specific stimuli and with the linking of specific stimulus representations to representations of specific types of reward outcome. By contrast, we argue that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex/mOFC is concerned with evaluation, value-guided decision-making and maintenance of a choice over successive decisions. Despite the popular view that they cause perseveration of behaviour and inability to inhibit repetition of a previously made choice, we found that lesions in neither orbitofrontal subdivision caused perseveration. On the contrary, lesions in the lOFC made animals switch more rapidly between choices when they were finding it difficult to assign reward values to choices. Lesions in the mOFC caused animals to lose their normal predisposition to repeat previously successful choices, suggesting that the mOFC does not just mediate value comparison in choice but also facilitates maintenance of the same choice if it has been successful.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1010
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Re-evaluating prokaryotic species
    Gevers, D
    Cohan, FM
    Lawrence, JG
    Spratt, BG
    Coenye, T
    Feil, EJ
    Stackebrandt, E
    Van de Peer, Y
    Vandamme, P
    Thompson, FL
    Swings, J
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 3 (09) : 733 - 739
  • [42] Re-evaluating Web evaluation
    Notess, GR
    [J]. ONLINE, 2006, 30 (01): : 45 - 47
  • [43] Re-evaluating the ENT procedures
    Maw, R
    [J]. PRACTITIONER, 2000, 244 (1612) : 608 - +
  • [44] Re-evaluating primate monogamy
    Fuentes, A
    [J]. AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, 1998, 100 (04) : 890 - 907
  • [45] Re-evaluating revalidation and appraisal
    Pringle, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2003, 53 (491): : 437 - 438
  • [46] RE-EVALUATING THE DECODING PRINCIPLE
    不详
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2012, 13 (05) : 280 - 280
  • [47] Re-evaluating therapeutic neovascularization
    de Muinck, ED
    Simons, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 36 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [48] Re-evaluating the Introduction of the Adoratio
    Lindholmer, Mads ortving
    [J]. HISTORIA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ALTE GESCHICHTE, 2024, 73 (03): : 362 - 383
  • [49] Re-evaluating base closings
    Browne, J
    [J]. MICROWAVES & RF, 2005, 44 (09) : 17 - 17
  • [50] Re-evaluating prokaryotic species
    Dirk Gevers
    Frederick M. Cohan
    Jeffrey G. Lawrence
    Brian G. Spratt
    Tom Coenye
    Edward J. Feil
    Erko Stackebrandt
    Yves Van de Peer
    Peter Vandamme
    Fabiano L. Thompson
    Jean Swings
    [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2005, 3 : 733 - 739