Performance of New Thresholds of the Glasgow Blatchford Score in Managing Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

被引:100
|
作者
Laursen, Stig B. [1 ]
Dalton, Harry R. [2 ]
Murray, Iain A. [3 ]
Michell, Nick [2 ]
Johnston, Matt R. [4 ]
Schultz, Michael [5 ]
Hansen, Jane M. [1 ]
de Muckadell, Ove B. Schaffalitzky [1 ]
Blatchford, Oliver [6 ]
Stanley, Adrian J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Med Gastroenterol, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] Royal Cornwall Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Truro, Cornwall, England
[3] Dunedin Publ Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dunedin Sch Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
[6] Univ Glasgow, Dept Publ Hlth, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Dept Gastroenterol, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Outpatient; Management; Gastrointestinal Bleeding; Prognosis; UGIH; OUTPATIENT MANAGEMENT; RISK STRATIFICATION; ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY; HEMORRHAGE; NEED; VALIDATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.023
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is a common cause of hospital admission. The Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) is an accurate determinant of patients' risk for hospital-based intervention or death. Patients with a GBS of 0 are at low risk for poor outcome and could be managed as outpatients. Some investigators therefore have proposed extending the definition of low-risk patients by using a higher GBS cut-off value, possibly with an age adjustment. We compared 3 thresholds of the GBS and 2 age-adjusted modifications to identify the optimal cutoff value or modification. METHODS: We performed an observational study of 2305 consecutive patients presenting with UGIH at 4 centers (Scotland, England, Denmark, and New Zealand). The performance of each threshold and modification was evaluated based on sensitivity and specificity analyses, the proportion of low-risk patients identified, and outcomes of patients classified as low risk. RESULTS: There were differences in age (P = .0001), need for intervention (P < .0001), mortality (P < .015), and GBS (P = . 0001) among sites. All systems identified low-risk patients with high levels of sensitivity (>97%). The GBS at cut-off values of <= 1 and <= 2, and both modifications, identified low-risk patients with higher levels of specificity (40%-49%) than the GBS with a cut-off value of 0 (22% specificity; P < .001). The GBS at a cut-off value of <= 2 had the highest specificity, but 3% of patients classified as low-risk patients had adverse outcomes. All GBS cut-off values, and score modifications, had low levels of specificity when tested in New Zealand (2.5%-11%). CONCLUSIONS: A GBS cut-off value of <= 1 and both GBS modifications identify almost twice as many low-risk patients with UGIH as a GBS at a cut-off value of 0. Implementing a protocol for outpatient management, based on one of these scores, could reduce hospital admissions by 15% to 20%.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / U186
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding
    Bryant, Robert V.
    Kuo, Paul
    Williamson, Kate
    Yam, Chantelle
    Schoeman, Mark N.
    Holloway, Richard H.
    Nguyen, Nam Q.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (04) : 576 - 583
  • [32] Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: better in predicting the need for endo-therapy and surgery
    Nguyen, N. Q.
    Bryant, R.
    Kuo, P.
    Williamson, K.
    Yam, S.
    Schoeman, M. N.
    Holloway, R. H.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 37 - 38
  • [33] Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score as an Alternative Predictors of Severity for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Abdullah, Taufiq
    Siswanto
    Pratomo, Bogi
    INDONESIAN BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 8 (02): : 91 - 96
  • [35] Analysis of the patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and comparison of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores
    Aktas, Gulali
    Ustaoglu, Muge
    Bakir, Tulay
    Aslan, Rahmi
    Goren, Fikret
    Bektas, Ahmet
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 41 (06) : 576 - 582
  • [36] Use of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score Improves Risk Stratification in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Prospective Comparison Against the Glasgow Blatchford, Pre- Endoscopy Rockall and Full Rockall Score
    Cheng, Derek W.
    Lu, Lucy Y.
    Teller, Thomas
    Sekhon, Harpreet K.
    Wu, Bechien U.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S193 - S194
  • [37] The Performance of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score in Predicting Clinical Interventions in Patients with Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Vietnamese Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
    Duc Trong Quach
    Ngoi Huu Dao
    Minh Cao Dinh
    Chung Huu Nguyen
    Linh Xuan Ho
    Nha-Doan Thi Nguyen
    Quang Dinh Le
    Cong Minh Hong Vo
    Sang Kim Le
    Hiyama, Toru
    GUT AND LIVER, 2016, 10 (03) : 375 - 381
  • [38] Is the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score Useful in Reducing Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed Admissions in a United States Hospital?
    Piccoli, L.
    Gilrain, K.
    Holliday, N.
    Pollack, M.
    Benenson, R.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (04) : S317 - S318
  • [39] ACUTE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING IN PATIENTS WITH A GLASGOW-BLATCHFORD SCORE OF ≤ 2 CAN BE SAFELY MANAGED USING AN AMBULATORY PATHWAY
    Penman, D.
    Conley, T.
    Molugu, C.
    Bassi, A.
    McLindon, J.
    Chandy, R.
    Dobson, J.
    Fox, M.
    Priestley, S.
    Theis, V.
    McClements, D.
    GUT, 2017, 66 : A71 - A72
  • [40] Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score, Rockall Score, and AIMS65 Score for Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Outcomes in Korea
    Choe, Jung Wan
    Lee, Dongwon
    Kim, Seung Young
    Hyun, Jong Jin
    Jung, Sung Woo
    Koo, Ja Seol
    Park, Jong-Jae
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Lee, Sang Woo
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S886 - S886