COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE VS. FACE-TO-FACE SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING

被引:0
|
作者
Bayonas, Mariche [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
来源
关键词
language teaching technology; second language acquisition; computer-mediated communication; online teaching and learning; LANGUAGE; TECHNOLOGY; PERSPECTIVES; DISTANCE; LEARNERS; CMC;
D O I
10.12795/elia.2022.i22.07
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study analyzes students' perceptions of their own learning of Spanish as a second language (L2) when comparing face-to-face (F2F) courses to online (OL) environments before the pandemic. It appears that most students are satisfied learning Spanish in either OL or F2F classes, but their self-reported perception of learning is lower for OL students than F2F participants. It also seems that a higher percentage of F2F participants are more satisfied with the format of their classes (F2F vs OL). It is argued that incorporating more asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) and teacher presence among this particular population of students may increase satisfaction with both learning environment and perception of learning. A further analysis compared Spanish final-exam scores among OL and F2F participants; the results showed that participants in F2F classes obtained statistically significant higher scores than participants in OL classes. Some pedagogical suggestions are presented for this particular population of Spanish as L2 online students.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 236
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Face-to-face vs. Online learning in Engineering Courses
    Guadalupe Garcia-Castelan, Rosa Maria
    Gonzalez-Nucamendi, Andres
    Robledo-Rella, Victor
    Neri, Luis
    Noguez, Julieta
    [J]. 2021 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2021), 2021,
  • [2] ANALYSIS OF STUDENT LEARNING EXPERIENCES IN AN UNDERGRADUATE BIOSTATISTICS COURSE: ONLINE VS. HYBRID VS. FACE-TO-FACE
    Corey, Darryl L.
    Patterson, Nikita
    [J]. EDULEARN12: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, : 2621 - 2629
  • [3] FACE-TO-FACE VS. ONLINE LEARNING: THE IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY
    Barbara-i-Molinero, Alba
    Sancha, Cristina
    Samper, Noelia
    [J]. ICERI2016: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2016, : 8280 - 8286
  • [4] Comparative Efficacy of Online vs. Face-to-Face Group Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Rafieifar, Maryam
    Hanbidge, Alice Schmidt
    Lorenzini, Sloan Bruan
    Macgowan, Mark J.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [5] MOTIVATION STRATEGIES IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING/LEARNING - A COMPARISON OF STIMULATING FACTORS IN FACE-TO-FACE VS. ONLINE STUDY
    David, Irina
    Grosu-Radulescu, Lucia-Mihaela
    [J]. ELEARNING VISION 2020!, VOL III, 2016, : 150 - 157
  • [6] Teaching in a pandemic: a comparative evaluation of online vs. face-to-face student outcome gains
    Helen Onyeaka
    Paolo Passaretti
    Jaimie Miller-Friedmann
    [J]. Discover Education, 3 (1):
  • [7] Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation: Effects on Civic Engagement
    Min, Seong-Jae
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2007, 12 (04) : 1369 - 1387
  • [8] Perceptions of Academic Honesty in Online vs. Face-to-Face Classrooms
    Spaulding, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE ONLINE LEARNING, 2009, 8 (03): : 183 - 198
  • [9] Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning
    Kemp, Nenagh
    Grieve, Rachel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [10] Interpersonal Interactions and Language Learning: Face-To-Face vs. Computer-Mediated Communication
    Zhao, Hui
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12