Supply Chain Risk Assessment: A Fuzzy AHP Approach

被引:25
|
作者
Ganguly, Kunal K. [1 ]
Kumar, Gopal [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Kashipur, Operat Management & Quantitat Tech, Uttarakhand, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Raipur, Chattisgarh, India
关键词
supply chain risk; risk assessment; fuzzy AHP; multi attribute decision making; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; MODEL; IMPACT; FLOW;
D O I
10.31387/oscm0360217
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Managing supply chain risk is a big challenge for any organization. The purpose of the paper is to provide a methodology for assessing supply chain risk using the Fuzzy based Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP). This study presents a comprehensive study to identify the Risk Factors (RFs) in supply chain and evaluate them. In this paper, sixteen risk factors were identified based on extensive literature survey. To limit the scope of the work, focus was on transaction and infrastructural risk and avoiding the demand risk The RFs are formulated as hierarchy structure and Fuzzy AHP as a Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) tool applied to judge the viable candidates. A revised risk matrix with a continuous scale was proposed to assess the RFs classes. The result classifies the RFs in different categories (Extreme, High, Medium and Low). Based on this result, some management implications and suggestions are proposed. The revised risk matrix with continuous scale for risk assessment in supply chain is a novel approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hybrid Fuzzy-Probabilistic Approach to Supply Chain Resilience Assessment
    Pavlov, Alexander
    Ivanov, Dmitry
    Dolgui, Alexandre
    Sokolov, Boris
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 65 (02) : 303 - 315
  • [32] Supply Chain Purchasing Risk Evaluation of Manufacturing Enterprise Based on Fuzzy-AHP Method
    Jiang Nan
    Huo Jia-Zhen
    Liu Hao-Hua
    [J]. ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1001 - +
  • [33] Prioritizing lean supply chain management initiatives in healthcare service operations: a fuzzy AHP approach
    Adebanjo, Dotun
    Laosirihongthong, Tritos
    Samaranayake, Premaratne
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2016, 27 (12) : 953 - 966
  • [34] Barriers to information and digital technology adoption in humanitarian supply chain management: a fuzzy AHP approach
    Kabra, Gaurav
    Ramesh, Anbanandam
    Jain, Vipul
    Akhtar, Pervaiz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 36 (02) : 505 - 527
  • [35] A Pythagorean fuzzy AHP approach and its application to evaluate the enablers of sustainable supply chain innovation
    Shete, Pankaj C.
    Ansari, Zulfiquar N.
    Kant, Ravi
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2020, 23 : 77 - 93
  • [36] Measuring port supply chain performance using fuzzy AHP
    Chuanxu, Wang
    [J]. Research on Organizational Innovation - 2007 Proceedings of International Conference on Enterprise Engineering and Management Innovation, 2007, : 1157 - 1162
  • [37] Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
    Samvedi, Avinash
    Jain, Vipul
    Chan, Felix T. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (08) : 2433 - 2442
  • [38] A Neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment in Automotive Industry of Pakistan
    Junaid, Muhammad
    Xue, Ye
    Syed, Muzzammil Wasim
    Li, Ji Zu
    Ziaullah, Muhammad
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [39] PERMUTATION OF FUZZY AHP AND AHP METHODS TO PRIORITIZING THE ALTERNATIVES OF SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE SYSTEM
    Tyagi, Mohit
    Kumar, Pradeep
    Kumar, Dinesh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2015, 22 (06): : 729 - 752
  • [40] A Quantitative Approach to Risk and Cost Assessment in Supply Chain Management
    Gisslen, Linus
    Horndahl, Andreas
    [J]. 2016 EUROPEAN INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY INFORMATICS CONFERENCE (EISIC), 2016, : 180 - 183