Mediated decision support in prostate cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial of decision counseling

被引:39
|
作者
Myers, Ronald E. [1 ]
Daskalakis, Constantine
Kunkel, Elisabeth J. S.
Cocroft, James R.
Riggio, Jeffrey M.
Capkin, Mark [2 ]
Braddock, Clarence H., III [3 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Div Populat Sci, Dept Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Decision counseling; Prostate cancer screening; Shared decision making; Risk assessment; Patient education; AFRICAN-AMERICAN MEN; PATIENT EDUCATION; BREAST-CANCER; ANTIGEN TEST; HEALTH-CARE; KNOWLEDGE; AID; INTERVENTIONS; INSTRUMENT; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: This randomized trial was conducted to assess the impact of a mediated decision support intervention on primary care patient prostate cancer screening knowledge, decisional conflict, informed decision making (IDM), and screening. Methods: Before a routine office visit, 313 male patients eligible for prostate cancer screening completed a baseline telephone survey and received a mailed brochure on prostate cancer screening. At the visit, participants were randomized to either an enhanced intervention (El) or a standard intervention (SI) group. Before meeting with their physician, El Group men had a nurse-led "decision counseling" session, while SI Group men completed a practice satisfaction survey. An endpoint survey was administered. Survey data, encounter audio-recordings, and chart audit data were used to assess study outcomes. Results: Knowledge increased in the El Group (mean difference of +0.8 on a 10-point scale, p = 0.001), but decisional conflict did not change (mean difference of -0.02 on a 4-point scale, p = 0.620). The El Group had higher IDM (rate ratio = 1.30, p = 0.029) and lower screening (odds ratio = 0.67, p = 0.102). Conclusion: Nurse-mediated decision counseling increased participant prostate cancer screening knowledge, and influenced informed decision making and screening. Practice implications: Nurses trained in decision counseling can facilitate shared decision making about screening. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 246
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PERSONALIZED DECISION SUPPORT FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF A MULTI-SITE RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    Berry, Donna
    Hong, Fangxin
    Blonquist, Traci
    Halpenny, Barbara
    Sanda, Martin
    Master, Viraj
    Filson, Christopher
    Rossi, Peter
    Chang, Peter
    Chien, Gary
    Jones, Randy
    Krupski, Tracey
    Sokoloff, Mitchell
    Wilson, Leslie
    Wolpin, Seth
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E122 - E122
  • [22] PRESENTING INFORMATION IN PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING DECISION AIDS: MORE INFORMATION OR THE BOTTOM-LINE GIST? A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Nalavenkata, Sunny
    Assel, Melissa
    Yu, Rebecca
    Bergengren, Oskar
    Stevanovic, Kristina
    Austria, Mia
    Gonsky, Jason
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Hamilton, Jada
    Hay, Jennifer
    Vickers, Andrew
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E394 - E395
  • [23] ProsCan for men: Randomised controlled trial of a decision support intervention for men with localised prostate cancer
    Chambers, Suzanne K.
    Ferguson, Megan
    Gardiner, R. A.
    Nicol, David
    Gordon, Louisa
    Occhipinti, Stefano
    Aitken, Joanne
    BMC CANCER, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [24] ProsCan for Men: Randomised controlled trial of a decision support intervention for men with localised prostate cancer
    Suzanne K Chambers
    Megan Ferguson
    RA Gardiner
    David Nicol
    Louisa Gordon
    Stefano Occhipinti
    Joanne Aitken
    BMC Cancer, 8
  • [25] A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial for PSA Screening Decision Support Interventions in Two Primary Care Settings
    Carmen L. Lewis
    Jared Adams
    Ming Tai-Seale
    Qiwen Huang
    Sarah B. Knowles
    Matthew E. Nielsen
    Michael P. Pignone
    Louise C. Walter
    Dominick L. Frosch
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 810 - 816
  • [26] A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial for PSA Screening Decision Support Interventions in Two Primary Care Settings
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    Adams, Jared
    Tai-Seale, Ming
    Huang, Qiwen
    Knowles, Sarah B.
    Nielsen, Matthew E.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Walter, Louise C.
    Frosch, Dominick L.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (06) : 810 - 816
  • [27] Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Comer, Robert Skipworth
    Slaven, James E., II
    Monahan, Patrick O.
    Vode, Emilee
    Hanna, Nasser H.
    Ceppa, DuyKhanh Pham
    Rawl, Susan M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [28] Impact of including quantitative information in a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial
    Schwartz, Peter H.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    Perkins, Susan M.
    Schmidt, Karen K.
    Althouse, Sandra
    Rawl, Susan M.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (04) : 726 - 734
  • [29] Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Based on Predicted Risk: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Plys, Ekaterina
    Bulliard, Jean-Luc
    Chaouch, Aziz
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Duuren, Luuk A. van
    Braendle, Karen
    Auer, Reto
    Froehlich, Florian
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Selby, Kevin
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [30] Decision support by telephone: Randomized controlled trial in a rural community setting
    Belkora, Jeffrey
    Stupar, Lauren
    O'Donnell, Sara
    Loucks, Aimee
    Moore, Dan
    Jupiter, Carla
    Johnson, Nancy
    Wilson, Leslie
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 89 (01) : 134 - 142