Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography performs better than contrast-enhanced computed tomography for metastasis evaluation in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

被引:10
|
作者
Santhosh, Sampath [1 ,2 ]
Mittal, Bhagwant Rai [2 ]
Bhasin, Deepak Kumar [3 ]
Rana, Surinder Singh [3 ]
Gupta, Rajesh [4 ]
Das, Ashim [5 ]
Nada, Ritambhra [5 ]
机构
[1] Tamil Nadu Govt Multi Super Specialty Hosp, Inst Nucl Imaging & Mol Med, Omandurar Govt Estate, Chennai 600002, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Nucl Med & PET, Chandigarh 160012, India
[3] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Med Gastroenterol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[4] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[5] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Histopathol, Chandigarh 160012, India
关键词
FDG-PET/CECT; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Staging; Metastasis; Malignancy; F-18-FDG PET/CT; FDG-PET/CT; CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; MANAGEMENT; CT; RESECTABILITY; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12149-017-1193-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the additional role of FDG-PET/CT to the conventional multiphasic CECT in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods 54 patients diagnosed with pathologically proven pancreatic malignancy underwent FDG-PET/CECT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT and CECT for nodal and metastatic staging were calculated. The statistical difference was calculated by McNemar's test. Results Of 54 patients, 15 had distal metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT and CECT for nodal staging were 33 vs 89%, 84 vs 100%, 67 vs 100%, 60 vs 90%, and 59 vs 95%, respectively, p < 0.001. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of CECT for metastatic staging were 73, 87, 69, 89, and 83%, whereas the accuracy of PET/CT was 100%, p = 0.01. By correctly characterizing unsuspected distant lesions, PET/CT could change management in 19% of patients. Conclusion FDG-PET/CT can contribute to change in the management in almost one of every five patients of PA evaluated with the standard investigations during the initial staging.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scan in Nodal Staging of Early Operable Uterine Cancers
    Zade, Anand A.
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    Purandare, Nilendu C.
    Shah, Sneha A.
    Agrawal, Archi R.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (03): : 183 - 187
  • [22] Evaluation of healed status in tuberculosis of spine by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and contrast magnetic resonance imaging
    Mittal, Samarth
    Jain, Anil K.
    Chakraborti, K. L.
    Aggarwal, Aditya Nath
    Upreti, Lalendra
    Bhayana, Himanshu
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 53 (01) : 160 - 168
  • [23] Evaluation of Healed Status in Tuberculosis of Spine by Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Samarth Mittal
    Anil K. Jain
    K. L. Chakraborti
    Aditya Nath Aggarwal
    Lalendra Upreti
    Himanshu Bhayana
    [J]. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2019, 53 : 160 - 168
  • [24] The Comparison of Computed Tomography Perfusion, Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Detection of Primary Esophageal Carcinoma
    Genc, Berhan
    Kantarci, Mecit
    Sade, Recep
    Orsal, Ebru
    Ogul, Hayri
    Okur, Aylin
    Aydin, Yener
    Karaca, Leyla
    Eroglu, Atilla
    [J]. MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2016, 25 (03) : 254 - 259
  • [25] Is combined 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography superior to Positron Emission Tomography or Computed Tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions ?
    Casneuf, Veerle
    Delrue, Louke
    Kelles, Annemarie
    Van Damme, Nancy
    Van Huysse, Jacques
    Berrevoet, Frederik
    De Vos, Martine
    Duyck, Philippe
    Peeters, Marc
    [J]. ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2007, 70 (04) : 331 - 338
  • [26] Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the staging and evaluation of treatment response in a patient with Castleman's disease: A case report
    Pelosi E.
    Skanjeti A.
    Cistaro A.
    Arena V.
    [J]. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2 (1)
  • [27] Initial Staging Impact of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
    Niikura, Naoki
    Liu, Jun
    Costelloe, Colleen M.
    Palla, Shana L.
    Madewell, John E.
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Yu, Tse-Kuan
    Tokuda, Yutaka
    Theriault, Richard L.
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    Ueno, Naoto T.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (06): : 772 - 782
  • [28] The Role of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Addition to Computed Tomography (CT) in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Costilla, Vanessa
    Borad, Mitesh
    Han, Nancy
    Crowell, Michael
    Faigel, Douglas
    Pannala, Rahul
    Miller, Laurence
    Cuong Nguyen
    Silva, Alvin
    Collins, Joseph
    Moss, Adyr
    Ashman, Jonathan
    Decker, G. Anton
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 : S68 - S68
  • [29] Staging chest computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: utility or futility?
    Pappas, Sam G.
    Christians, Kathleen K.
    Tolat, Parag P.
    Mautz, Alan P.
    Lal, Alysandra
    McElroy, Lisa
    Gamblin, T. Clark
    Turaga, Kiran K.
    Tsai, Susan
    Erickson, Beth
    Ritch, Paul
    Evans, Douglas B.
    [J]. HPB, 2014, 16 (01) : 70 - 74
  • [30] Clinical impact of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scan/computed tomography in comparison with computed tomography on the detection of colorectal cancer recurrence
    Deleau, Celine
    Buecher, Bruno
    Rousseau, Caroline
    Kraeber-Bodere, Francoise
    Flamant, Mathurin
    des Varannes, Stanislas Bruley
    Frampas, Eric
    Galmiche, Jean-Paul
    Matysiak-Budnik, Tamara
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 23 (03) : 275 - 281