Efficacy of extra-peritoneal pelvic packing in hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures, a Propensity Score Analysis

被引:54
|
作者
Chiara, Osvaldo [1 ,3 ]
di Fratta, Emanuele [1 ]
Mariani, Anna [1 ]
Michaela, Bertuzzi [2 ]
Prestini, Lucia [2 ]
Sammartano, Fabrizio [1 ]
Cimbanassi, Stefania [1 ]
机构
[1] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda Milano, Niguarda Trauma Ctr, SC Trauma Team, Milan, Italy
[2] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda Milano, SC Qual Assessment Serv, Milan, Italy
[3] Trauma Team Osped Niguarda, Piazza Osped Maggiore 3, I-20162 Milan, Italy
来源
关键词
Pelvic fracture; Hemodynamic instability; Extra-peritoneal pelvic packing; Propensity score analysis; RING INJURIES; EXTERNAL FIXATION; TRAUMA CENTER; MANAGEMENT; INSTABILITY; HEMORRHAGE; RESUSCITATION; EMBOLIZATION; COAGULOPATHY; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1186/s13017-016-0077-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: An option for emergency control of pelvic hemorrhage is Extra-peritoneal Pelvic Packing (EPP), which addresses the retroperitoneal source of exsanguination in pelvic fractures. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of early EPP in reducing mortality due to hemorrhage from pelvic fractures, and to evaluate the impact of packing on transfusion requirements within the first 24 h and ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS). All data pertaining trauma patients admitted from October 2002 and December 2103 with hemodynamic instability and pelvic fractures were selected from the Hospital Trauma Registry. Patients with severe brain injury and bleeding from extra-pelvic sources were excluded. Patient population was divided into two groups: EPP group, including patients admitted from 2009 to 2013, with EPP as part of the treatment algorithm, and NO-EPP group, from 2002 to 2008, without EPP as atherapeutic option. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on allpatients. Twenty-five patients of each group with similar features were matched using Propensity Score Analysis (PSA). Results: Six hundred eighty out of 4659 major trauma (14.6 %) presented a pelvic fracture. In 78 hemodynamically unstable patients (30 in EPP group, 48 in NO-EPP group) the major source of bleeding was the pelvis. Among patients selected by PSA early mortality was significantly reduced in EPP group (20 vs 52 %, p = .03) compared to NO-EPP, notwithstanding similar hemodynamic impairment. No difference was observed in transfusion requirements and ICU-LOS. Conclusions: The EPP is a safe and quick procedure, able to improve hemodynamic stabilization and to reduce acute mortality due to hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture, in combination with optimized transfusion protocol. EPP may be useful as a bridge for time-consuming procedures, such as angio-embolization.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Direct retroperitoneal pelvic packing versus pelvic angiography: A comparison of two management protocols for haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures
    Osborn, Patrick M.
    Smith, Wade R.
    Moore, Ernest E.
    Cothren, C. Clay
    Morgan, Steven J.
    Williams, Allison E.
    Stahel, Philip F.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (01): : 54 - 60
  • [42] Control of diffuse bleeding in unstable pelvic fractures with compression plate packing
    Biewener, A.
    Rammelt, S.
    Heineck, J.
    Grass, R.
    Zwipp, H.
    Pyrc, J.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2011, 114 (06): : 541 - +
  • [43] INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH EXTENDED LAPAROSCOPIC EXTRA-PERITONEAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY (ELPL) TO STRATIFY PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER FOR WHOLE PELVIC RADIOTHERAPY
    Contractor, K.
    Hellawell, G.
    Winkler, M.
    Challapalli, A.
    Agrawal, S.
    Dunn, P.
    Mangar, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S359 - S360
  • [44] Prospective validation of a new protocol with preperitoneal pelvic packing as the mainstay for the treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma: a 5-year experience
    Stefano Magnone
    Niccolò Allievi
    Marco Ceresoli
    Federico Coccolini
    Michele Pisano
    Luca Ansaloni
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2021, 47 : 499 - 505
  • [45] Prospective validation of a new protocol with preperitoneal pelvic packing as the mainstay for the treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma: a 5-year experience
    Magnone, Stefano
    Allievi, Niccolo
    Ceresoli, Marco
    Coccolini, Federico
    Pisano, Michele
    Ansaloni, Luca
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 47 (02) : 499 - 505
  • [46] Inflate and pack! Pelvic packing combined with REBOA deployment prevents hemorrhage related deaths in unstable pelvic fractures
    Werner, Nicole L.
    Moore, Ernest E.
    Hoehn, Melanie
    Lawless, Ryan
    Coleman, Julia R.
    Freedberg, Mari
    Heelan, Alicia A.
    Platnick, K. Barry
    Cohen, Mitchell J.
    Coleman, Jamie J.
    Campion, Eric M.
    Fox, Charles J.
    Mauffrey, Cyril
    Cralley, Alexis
    Pieracci, Fredric M.
    Burlew, Clay Cothren
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2022, 53 (10): : 3365 - 3370
  • [47] THE NEW METHOD OF PELVIC PACKING AGAINST CONTINUING INTRAPELVIC BLEEDING RESULTING FROM THE UNSTABLE PELVIC RING FRACTURES
    Egiazaryan, K. A.
    Gordienko, D., I
    Starchik, D. A.
    Lysko, A. M.
    BULLETIN OF RUSSIAN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, 2019, (02): : 76 - 80
  • [48] Preperitoneal packing versus angioembolization for the initial management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    McDonogh, Jack M.
    Lewis, Daniel P.
    Tarrant, Seth M.
    Balogh, Zsolt J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2022, 92 (05): : 931 - 939
  • [49] EFFECT OF MINI-DOSE HEPARIN ON LYMPHOCELE FORMATION FOLLOWING EXTRA-PERITONEAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY
    CATALONA, WJ
    KADMON, D
    CRANE, DB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 123 (06): : 890 - 892
  • [50] Current Indications of Surgery for the Treatment of Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures. Adaptation to War Surgery
    Hornez, E.
    de l'Escalopier, N.
    Boddaert, G.
    Monchal, T.
    Bourgouin, S.
    Thouard, H.
    E-MEMOIRES DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE CHIRURGIE, 2014, 13 (04): : 4 - 11