Predicting Ozone Pollution in Urban Areas Using Machine Learning and Quantile Regression Models

被引:1
|
作者
Cueva, Fernando [1 ,2 ]
Saquicela, Victor [1 ]
Sarmiento, Juan [1 ]
Cabrera, Fanny [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cuenca, Av 12 Abril S-N, Cuenca, Azuay, Ecuador
[2] Rochester Inst Technol, One Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
Ozone; Pollutants; Ensemble models; Neural networks; Quantile regression; AIR-POLLUTION; CHINA;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-89941-7_20
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Ozone is the most harmful secondary pollutant in terms of negative effects on climate change and human health. Predicting ozone emission levels has therefore gained importance within the field of environmental management. This study, performed in the Andean city of Cuenca, Ecuador, compares the performance of two methodologies currently used for this task and based on machine learning and quantile regression techniques. These techniques were applied using cross-sectional data to predict the ozone concentration per city block during the year 2018. Our results reveal that ozone concentration is significantly influenced by nitrogen dioxide, sedimentary particles, sulfur dioxide, traffic, and spatial features. We use the mean square error, the coefficient of determination, and the quantile loss as evaluation metrics for the performance of the ozone prediction models, employing a cross-validation scheme with a fold. Our work shows that the random forest technique outperforms gradient boosting prediction, neural network, and quantile regression methods.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 296
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of machine learning methods for ozone pollution prediction
    Pan, Qilong
    Harrou, Fouzi
    Sun, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [42] Network Traffic Prediction using Quantile Regression with linear, Tree, and Deep Learning Models
    Alutaibi, Ahmed
    Ganti, Sudhakar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE 45TH CONFERENCE ON LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS (LCN 2020), 2020, : 421 - 424
  • [43] Comparing forecasting models for predicting nursery mortality under field conditions using regression and machine learning algorithms
    Magalhaes, Edison S.
    Zhang, Danyang
    Wang, Chong
    Thomas, Pete
    Moura, Cesar A. A.
    Trevisan, Giovani
    Holtkamp, Derald J.
    Rademacher, Christopher
    Silva, Gustavo S.
    Linhares, Daniel C. L.
    [J]. SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 5
  • [44] Predicting County-level Chlamydia Rates in the United States Using Machine Learning Regression and Tree Models
    Xu, Tong
    Hong, Jaeyoung
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2022, 49 (10S) : S99 - S99
  • [45] Predicting the Occurrence of Metabolic Syndrome Using Machine Learning Models
    Trigka, Maria
    Dritsas, Elias
    Lahoz-Beltra, Rafael
    Zhang, Yudong
    [J]. COMPUTATION, 2023, 11 (09)
  • [46] PREDICTING HEALTHCARE COSTS OF DIABETES USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS
    Gonzalez Rodriguez, J.
    Pinzon Espitia, O. L.
    Franco, C.
    Augusto, V
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S575 - S575
  • [47] Predicting Web Survey Breakoffs Using Machine Learning Models
    Chen, Zeming
    Cernat, Alexandru
    Shlomo, Natalie
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2023, 41 (02) : 573 - 591
  • [48] Predicting Promoters in Phage Genomes Using Machine Learning Models
    Sampaio, Marta
    Rocha, Miguel
    Oliveira, Hugo
    Dias, Oscar
    [J]. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 1005 : 105 - 112
  • [49] Predicting wildfires in Algerian forests using machine learning models
    Zaidi, Abdelhamid
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (07)
  • [50] Predicting brain tumor presence using machine learning models
    Huang, Weiguo
    Dai, Zhenhua
    [J]. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, 2025, 8 (01)