Self-Collected Human Papillomavirus Testing Acceptability: Comparison of Two Self-Sampling Modalities

被引:45
|
作者
Igidbashian, Sarah [1 ]
Boveri, Sara [1 ]
Spolti, Noemi [1 ]
Radice, Davide [2 ]
Sandri, Maria Teresa [3 ]
Sideri, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Prevent Gynaecol Unit, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] European Inst Oncol, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[3] European Inst Oncol, Lab Med Unit, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
INVASIVE CERVICAL-CARCINOMA; CANCER; WOMEN; DNA; SPECIMENS; MORTALITY; HISTORY; METAANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; CONCORDANCE;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2010.2189
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can be used as a primary test for cervical cancer screening. HPV self-sampling has the potential to replace physician/nurse sampling. Our objective was to compare the acceptability of two self-sampling methods among 205 women undergoing an excisional procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO). Methods: One hundred eleven patients were given a Hybrid Capture (HC) Cervical Sampler (TM) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 94 received a self-lavaging device, the Delphi (R) Screener (Delphi Bioscience, Scherpenzeel, The Netherlands), both with written instructions. Self-sampling was performed just before the clinician-collected cervical sample. Women responded to questions using 5-point ordinal scales on the general acceptability of self-sampling and the physical comfort, embarrassment, pain, and difficulty experienced. Participants were also asked whether they prefer self-sampling or clinician sampling. Results: Both self-sampling methods were generally accepted with a significantly high score (p = 0.005) and significantly lower embarrassment (p = 0.042) in favor of the Delphi Screener. Both self-sampling methods were physically well accepted, not painful, and easy to perform. Most women (n = 117, 68%) preferred the self-sampled compared to the clinician-sampled test, with a significantly higher proportion in the Delphi Screener group (n = 59, 77.6%) compared to those using the HC Sampler (n = 58, 60.4%) (p = 0.021). Conclusions: The present study shows that self-sampling for HPV testing is favorably received by women. A sampling device specifically developed for self-sampling, such as the Delphi Screener, shows the highest degree of satisfaction. A well-accepted HPV sampling method could be especially useful for women who do not take part in cervical screening or in settings where organized screening is not fully implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 402
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SELF-SAMPLING ACCEPTABILITY FOR HPV TESTING IN A CITY IN THE INTERIOR OF PORTUGAL
    Gouvinhas, C.
    Cruz, M.
    Alves, C.
    Mendes, R.
    Lunet, N.
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2023, 37 : S331 - S332
  • [32] Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection in self-collected urine
    Prusty, BK
    Kumar, A
    Arora, R
    Batra, S
    Das, BC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 90 (03) : 223 - 227
  • [33] A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling and informational materials among diverse populations
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Rivelli, Jennifer S.
    Firemark, Alison J.
    Johnson, Cheryl A.
    Locher, Blake W.
    Gille, Sara
    Najarian, Matthew J.
    Varga, Alexandra M.
    Schneider, Jennifer L.
    Green, Beverly
    Winer, Rachel L.
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (14):
  • [35] Feasibility and acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling in a semi-urban area in northern Tanzania
    Mahande, Michael J.
    Oneko, Olola
    Amour, Caroline
    Pollie, Meridith
    Smith, Cheyenne
    Mboya, Innocent B.
    Finkel, Madelon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 154 (01) : 113 - 118
  • [36] Comparison of natural histories of human papillomavirus detected by clinician- and self-sampling
    Moscicki, Anna-Barbara
    Widdice, Lea
    Ma, Yifei
    Farhat, Sepideh
    Miller-Benningfield, Susanna
    Jonte, Janet
    Jay, Julie
    de Medina, Cheryl Godwin
    Hanson, Evelyn
    Clayton, Lisa
    Shiboski, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 127 (08) : 1882 - 1892
  • [37] Comparison of physician- and self-collected genital specimens for detection of human papillomavirus in men
    Hernandez, BY
    McDuffie, K
    Goodman, MT
    Wilkens, LR
    Thompson, P
    Zhu, X
    Wong, W
    Ning, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (02) : 513 - 517
  • [38] Vaginal self-sampling without preservative for human papillomavirus testing shows good sensitivity
    Darlin, Lotten
    Borgfeldt, Christer
    Forslund, Ola
    Henic, Emir
    Dillner, Joakim
    Kannisto, Paivi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2013, 56 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [39] The Acceptability and Preference of Vaginal Self-sampling for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Testing among a Multi-ethnic Asian Female Population
    Khoo, Su Pei
    Lim, Wen Tzien
    Rajasuriar, Reena
    Nasir, Nazrila Hairizan
    Gravitt, Patti
    Woo, Yin Ling
    [J]. CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [40] Evaluation of self-collected cervicovaginal cell samples for human papillomavirus testing by polymerase chain reaction
    Gravitt, PE
    Lacey, JV
    Brinton, LA
    Barnes, WA
    Kornegay, JR
    Greenberg, MD
    Greene, SM
    Hadjimichael, OC
    McGowan, L
    Mortel, R
    Schwartz, PE
    Zaino, R
    Hildesheim, A
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2001, 10 (02) : 95 - 100