Self-Collected Human Papillomavirus Testing Acceptability: Comparison of Two Self-Sampling Modalities

被引:45
|
作者
Igidbashian, Sarah [1 ]
Boveri, Sara [1 ]
Spolti, Noemi [1 ]
Radice, Davide [2 ]
Sandri, Maria Teresa [3 ]
Sideri, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Prevent Gynaecol Unit, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] European Inst Oncol, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[3] European Inst Oncol, Lab Med Unit, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
INVASIVE CERVICAL-CARCINOMA; CANCER; WOMEN; DNA; SPECIMENS; MORTALITY; HISTORY; METAANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; CONCORDANCE;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2010.2189
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can be used as a primary test for cervical cancer screening. HPV self-sampling has the potential to replace physician/nurse sampling. Our objective was to compare the acceptability of two self-sampling methods among 205 women undergoing an excisional procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO). Methods: One hundred eleven patients were given a Hybrid Capture (HC) Cervical Sampler (TM) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 94 received a self-lavaging device, the Delphi (R) Screener (Delphi Bioscience, Scherpenzeel, The Netherlands), both with written instructions. Self-sampling was performed just before the clinician-collected cervical sample. Women responded to questions using 5-point ordinal scales on the general acceptability of self-sampling and the physical comfort, embarrassment, pain, and difficulty experienced. Participants were also asked whether they prefer self-sampling or clinician sampling. Results: Both self-sampling methods were generally accepted with a significantly high score (p = 0.005) and significantly lower embarrassment (p = 0.042) in favor of the Delphi Screener. Both self-sampling methods were physically well accepted, not painful, and easy to perform. Most women (n = 117, 68%) preferred the self-sampled compared to the clinician-sampled test, with a significantly higher proportion in the Delphi Screener group (n = 59, 77.6%) compared to those using the HC Sampler (n = 58, 60.4%) (p = 0.021). Conclusions: The present study shows that self-sampling for HPV testing is favorably received by women. A sampling device specifically developed for self-sampling, such as the Delphi Screener, shows the highest degree of satisfaction. A well-accepted HPV sampling method could be especially useful for women who do not take part in cervical screening or in settings where organized screening is not fully implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 402
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance and acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus testing among women living with HIV
    Wang, Runzhi
    Lee, Kristen
    Gaydos, Charlotte A.
    Anderson, Jean
    Keller, Jean
    Coleman, Jenell
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 99 : 452 - 457
  • [2] Clinician and Patient Acceptability of Self-Collected Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening
    Mao, Constance
    Kulasingam, Shalini L.
    Whitham, Hilary K.
    Hawes, Stephen E.
    Lin, John
    Kiviat, Nancy B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 26 (06) : 609 - 615
  • [3] Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing: Acceptability in a US Safety Net Health System
    Parker, Susan L.
    Amboree, Trisha L.
    Bulsara, Shaun
    Daheri, Maria
    Anderson, Matthew L.
    Hilsenbeck, Susan G.
    Jibaja-Weiss, Maria L.
    Zare, Mohammed
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Deshmukh, Ashish A.
    Chiao, Elizabeth Y.
    Scheurer, Michael E.
    Montealegre, Jane R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 66 (03) : 540 - 547
  • [4] Feasibility, validity and acceptability of self-collected samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in rural Malawi
    Esber, Allahna
    Norris, Alison
    Jumbe, Enock
    Kandodo, Jonathan
    Nampandeni, Patrick
    Reese, Patricia Carr
    Turner, Abigail Norris
    [J]. MALAWI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 30 (02) : 61 - 64
  • [5] Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability
    Racey, C. Sarai
    Gesink, Dionne C.
    Burchell, Ann N.
    Trivers, Suzanne
    Wong, Tom
    Rebbapragada, Anu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 25 (05) : 489 - 497
  • [6] Self-sampling versus physician-sampling for human papillomavirus testing
    Agorastos, T
    Dinas, K
    Lloveras, B
    Font, R
    Kornegay, JR
    Bontis, J
    de Sanjose, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2005, 16 (11) : 727 - 729
  • [7] Acceptability of self-collected human papillomavirus specimens as a primary screen for cervical cancer
    Quincy, B. L.
    Turbow, D. J.
    Dabinett, L. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 32 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [9] Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling devices for human Papillomavirus detection: A systematic review
    Aimagambetova, Gulzhanat
    Atageldiyeva, Kuralay
    Marat, Aizada
    Suleimenova, Assem
    Issa, Torgyn
    Raman, Sarina
    Huang, Timothy
    Ashimkhanova, Ayimkul
    Aron, Saida
    Dongo, Andrew
    Iztleuov, Yerbolat
    Shamkeeva, Saykal
    Azizan, Azliyati
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 38
  • [10] Self-Collected Samples for Testing of Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review
    Stewart, Donna E.
    Gagliardi, Anna
    Johnston, Mary
    Howlett, Robbi
    Barata, Paula
    Lewis, Nancy
    Oliver, Thomas
    Mai, Verna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2007, 29 (10) : 817 - 828