Attitudes and Side Effects Related to Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccination in Healthcare Personnel

被引:0
|
作者
Ormen, Bahar [1 ]
Turker, Nesrin [1 ]
Vardar, Ilknur [1 ]
Kaptan, Figen [1 ]
El, Sibel [1 ]
Ural, Serap [1 ]
Kaya, Fatih [1 ]
Coskun, Nejat Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Training & Res Hosp, Clin Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, TR-35360 Izmir, Turkey
来源
MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI | 2012年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
Pandemic influenza; influenza A virus; H1N1; vaccine; vaccination; adverse effects; WORKERS; VACCINES; A(H1N1);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were to evaluate the attitudes towards H1N1 vaccination and to determine the safety and side effects following 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccination. Pandemic influenza vaccine had been administered to the healthcare personnel in our research and training hospital in December 2009. The rate being vaccinated was established as 40% (800/2000). Four months following vaccination, the opinions about vaccination were asked to the healthcare workers, and also side effects were questioned to the vaccinated group. Two different questionnaires (for vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects) were delivered to the volunteers who agreed to participate in the study. Demographic features, reasons related to being vaccinated or not, were questioned. The vaccinated group was also questioned for the presence of chronic diseases, previous vaccinations (pandemic/seasonal influenza), local or systemic reactions that develop after vaccination. A total of 332 volunteers participated in the questionnaire. Of them 247 (74.4%) were vaccinated and 85 (25.6%) were unvaccinated. Male/female ratio of the participants was 1.2, and 55.7% of them were older than 30-year-old. Most of the participants (82.8%) were highly educated (high school and faculty-graduated). Vaccination rates were found statistically significant in advanced age group compared to young adults (p=0.042); in male gender compared to females (p=0.001) and in parents compared to subjects who didn't have children (p=0.021). Vaccination rates were observed to be higher (57.5%) in non-medical staff (cleaning employers, administrative personnel, etc.) than the physicians (29.1%) and nurses (13.4%), and the rate was also high (54.7%) in personnel who worked in intensive care units, emergency department and administrative units than the personnel who worked in the clinics of internal medicine (22.3%) and surgery (23.1%) (p=0.001). The most important causes of rejecting vaccination were being afraid of the side effects (69.4%) and not believing the effectiveness of the vaccine (56.4%). The leading causes of accepting vaccination were worries about infecting their family (60.3%) and being in a risk group (54.3%). After vaccination, local reactions (pain, swelling and redness at the vaccination site) were described in 43.3% and systemic reactions (weakness, fatigue, muscle aches, influenza-like symptoms, etc.) were described in 43.7% of the subjects. Severe side effects such as vasculitis, neuritis, encephalomyelitis, Guillian-Barre syndrome and anaphylactic reaction were not observed in any of the vaccinated cases. It was detected that worries about the safety of vaccine had negative impact for vaccination. Since no serious side effects were detected related to vaccination, it was concluded that the vaccine was safe. In spite of the scientific proofs, negative concerns about the safety of the vaccines can unfavorably affect the vaccination campaigns and can jeopardize efforts of influenza control. As a result, data collection systems about the safety and side effects of the vaccine all over the country and regular reports about these data may more efficiently guide vaccination programs in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 64
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] New influenza A(H1N1) vaccination
    Vulto, Arnold G.
    EJHP PRACTICE, 2009, 15 (06): : 9 - 9
  • [32] SHOENFELD'S SYNDROME AFTER PANDEMIC INFLUENZA A/H1N1 VACCINATION
    Barros, Solange Murta
    de Carvalho, Jozelio Freire
    ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2011, 36 (01): : 65 - 68
  • [33] Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination coverage in Western Australia
    Mak, Donna B.
    Daly, Alison M.
    Armstrong, Paul K.
    Effler, Paul V.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 193 (07) : 401 - 404
  • [34] Narcolepsy and influenza A(H1N1) pandemic 2009 vaccination in the United States
    Duffy, Jonathan
    Weintraub, Eric
    Vellozzi, Claudia
    DeStefano, Frank
    NEUROLOGY, 2014, 83 (20) : 1823 - 1830
  • [35] Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic infection and vaccination in asthmatic patients
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    ANNALS OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 7 (02) : 144 - U109
  • [36] The determinants of 2009 pandemic A/H1N1 influenza vaccination: A systematic review
    Brien, Stephanie
    Kwong, Jeffrey C.
    Buckeridge, David L.
    VACCINE, 2012, 30 (07) : 1255 - 1264
  • [37] Acceptance of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination by the Australian public
    Eastwood, Keith
    Durrheim, David N.
    Jones, Alison
    Butler, Michelle
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 192 (01) : 33 - 36
  • [38] Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccination in children: A UK perspective
    de Whalley, Philip C. S.
    Pollard, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2013, 49 (03) : E183 - E188
  • [39] Healthcare Worker Acceptance of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Vaccination, Morocco
    Tagajdid, Rida
    El Annaz, Hicham
    Doblali, Taoufik
    Sefiani, Kawtar
    Belfquih, Bouchra
    Mrani, Saad
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 16 (10) : 1638 - 1639
  • [40] KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES IN REGARD TO PANDEMIC INFLUENZA A(H1N1) IN A MULTIETHNIC COMMUNITY
    Wong, Li-Ping
    Sam, I-Ching
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 17 : 147 - 147