Numerical sensitivity study of thermal response tests

被引:128
|
作者
Wagner, Valentin [1 ]
Bayer, Peter [2 ]
Kuebert, Markus [3 ]
Blum, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] KIT, Inst Appl Geosci AGW, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] ETH, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tewag Technol Erdwarmeanlagen Umweltschutz GmbH, D-72181 Starzach Felldorf, Germany
关键词
Geothermal energy; Thermal response test; Thermal conductivity; Geothermal gradient; Thermal dispersivity; BOREHOLE HEAT-EXCHANGERS; GROUNDWATER-FLOW; PUMP SYSTEMS; IN-SITU; CONDUCTIVITY; RESISTANCE; CAPACITY; STORAGE; PLUMES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Thermal conductivity and thermal borehole resistance are basic parameters for the technical and sustainable design of closed ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems. One of the most common methods to determine these parameters is the thermal response test (TRT). The response data measured are typically evaluated by the Kelvin line source equation which does not consider all relevant processes of heat transfer in the subsurface. The approach only considers conductive heat transfer from the borehole heat exchanger (BHE) and all transport effects are combined in the parameters of effective thermal conductivity and thermal borehole resistance. In order to examine primary effects in more detail, a sensitivity study based on numerically generated TRT data sets is performed considering the effects of (1) the in-situ position of the U-shaped pipes of borehole heat exchangers (shank spacing), (2) a non-uniform initial thermal distribution (such as a geothermal gradient), and (3) thermal dispersivity. It will be demonstrated that the shank spacing and the non-uniform initial thermal distribution have minor effects (less than 10%) on the effective thermal conductivity and the determined borehole resistance. Constant groundwater velocity with varying thermal dispersivity values, however, has a significant influence on the thermal borehole resistance. These effects are even more pronounced for interpreted effective thermal conductivity which is overestimated by a factor of 1.2-2.9 compared to the real thermal conductivity of the saturated porous media. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 253
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Numerical simulation of thermal sensitivity for explosives
    Zhang Xiangrong
    Dan Xu
    Zhou Lin
    RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, PTS 1-4, 2013, 734-737 : 2116 - 2119
  • [12] Study on the Thermal Sensitivity of Anisotropic Thin Sheets: Application to Hot Bulge Tests
    Eladeb, Aboulbaba
    Nasri, Mohamed Toumi
    Becheikh, Nidhal
    Ghazouani, Nejib
    Tashkandi, Mohammed A.
    MECHANIKA, 2024, 30 (02): : 110 - 122
  • [13] Axisymmetric numerical study on thermal response of composites to laser irradiation
    Zhang, Jialei, 2014, Editorial Office of High Power Laser and Particle Beams (26):
  • [14] Development of a model for thin films and numerical sensitivity tests
    Simon, Amelie
    Dorey, Jean-Marc
    Lance, Michel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2018, 232 (05) : 525 - 535
  • [15] Development and validation of disturbance-considering numerical model for investigation of error in thermal response tests
    Choi, Wonjun
    Ooka, Ryozo
    6TH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PHYSICS CONFERENCE (IBPC 2015), 2015, 78 : 1956 - 1961
  • [16] Experimental and numerical data of thermal response tests executed in groups of energy piles connected in series
    Neto, Luis Bandeira
    Narsilio, Guillermo
    Makasis, Nikolas
    Choudhary, Ruchi
    Carden, Yale
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2023, 48
  • [17] Validation and Numerical Sensitivity Study of Air Baffle Photovoltaic-Thermal Module
    Kim, Yu-Jin
    Lee, Kwang-Seob
    Yang, Libing
    Entchev, Evgueniy
    Kang, Eun-Chul
    Lee, Euy-Joon
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (08)
  • [18] AGGLUTININ RESPONSE TO INTRADERMAL TESTS FOR SENSITIVITY TO THE BRUCELLA
    CARPENTER, CM
    DEBOER, CJ
    KLEIN, SJ
    TEMPEREAU, CE
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1950, 65 (03): : 331 - 335
  • [19] Advanced thermal response tests: A review
    Wilke, Sascha
    Menberg, Kathrin
    Steger, Hagen
    Blum, Philipp
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 119
  • [20] Error analysis of thermal response tests
    Witte, Henk J. L.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 109 : 302 - 311