Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer

被引:42
|
作者
Kim, Eun Young [2 ]
Youn, Inyoung [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Kwan Ho [2 ]
Yun, Ji-Sup [2 ]
Park, Yong Lai [2 ]
Park, Chan Heun [2 ]
Moon, Juhee [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Seon Hyeong [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Yoon Jung [1 ,2 ]
Ham, Soo-Youn [1 ,2 ]
Kook, Shin Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Radiol, 29 Saemunan Ro, Seoul 03181, South Korea
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Contrast media; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MRI; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e62
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in preoperative evaluations, and to evaluate the effect of each modality on the surgical management of women with breast cancer. Methods: This single-center, prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2016 to October 2017, 84 patients who were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma (69/84) and ductal carcinoma in situ (15/84), and underwent both CEDM and CEMRI, were enrolled. Imaging findings and surgical management were correlated with pathological results and compared. The diagnostic performance of both modalities in the detection of index and secondary cancers (multifocality and multicentricity), and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, was compared. The authors also evaluated whether CEDM or CEMRI resulted in changes in the surgical management of the affected breast due to imaging-detected findings. Results: Eighty-four women were included in the analysis. Compared with CEMRI, CEDM demonstrated a similar sensitivity (92.9% [78/84] vs. 952% [80/84]) in detecting index cancer (p=0.563). For the detection of secondary cancers in the ipsilateral breast and occult cancer in the contralateral breast, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (p=0.999 and p =0.999, respectively). Regarding changes in surgical management, CEDM resulted in similar changes compared with CEMRI (30.9% [26/84] vs. 29.7% [25/84], p=0.610). Regarding changes in surgical management due to false-positive findings, no significant differences were found between CEDM and CEMRI (34.6% [9/26] vs. 44.0% [11/25], p=0.782). Conclusion: CEDM demonstrated a diagnostic performance comparable with CEMRI in depicting index cancers, secondary cancers, and occult cancer in the contralateral breast. CEDM demonstrated similar changes in surgical management compared with CEMRI.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 462
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer
    Rossano Girometti
    Anna Linda
    Paola Conte
    Michele Lorenzon
    Isabella De Serio
    Katerina Jerman
    Viviana Londero
    Chiara Zuiani
    La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 : 1407 - 1414
  • [32] Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of the Biliary Obstruction
    Bilgin, Mehmet
    Toprak, Huseyin
    Burgazli, Mehmet
    Bilgin, S. Sennur
    Chasan, Ritvan
    Erdogan, Ali
    Balci, Cem
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [33] Study on the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer
    Pang, Xinnian
    Zhang, Jianhua
    Chen, Lvcou
    Yuan, Yang
    Xu, Dong
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [34] CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE BREAST
    GRIBBESTAD, IS
    NILSEN, G
    FJOSNE, H
    FOUGNER, R
    HAUGEN, OA
    PETERSEN, SB
    RINCK, PA
    KVINNSLAND, S
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1992, 31 (08) : 833 - 842
  • [35] Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the breast with magnetic resonance
    Cron, GO
    Santyr, G
    Kelcz, F
    IMTC/97 - IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE: SENSING, PROCESSING, NETWORKING, PROCEEDINGS VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 1354 - 1356
  • [36] CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE BREAST
    HEYWANGKOBRUNNER, SH
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1994, 29 (01) : 94 - 104
  • [37] Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer
    Ali-Mucheru, Mariam
    Patel, Bhavika
    Pockaj, Barbara
    Pizzitola, Victor
    Wasif, Nabil
    Stucky, Chee-Chee
    Gray, Richard
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 : 14 - 15
  • [38] Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer
    Ali-Mucheru, Mariam
    Pockaj, Barbara
    Patel, Bhavika
    Pizzitola, Victor
    Wasif, Nabil
    Stucky, Chee-Chee
    Gray, Richard
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 : S649 - S655
  • [39] Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer
    Mariam Ali-Mucheru
    Barbara Pockaj
    Bhavika Patel
    Victor Pizzitola
    Nabil Wasif
    Chee-Chee Stucky
    Richard Gray
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 649 - 655
  • [40] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Diagnosis of Infected Nonunions
    Fischer, Christian
    Preuss, Eva-Maria
    Tanner, Michael
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Krix, Martin
    Amarteifio, Erick
    Miska, Matthias
    Moghaddam-Alvandi, Arash
    Schmidmaier, Gerhard
    Weber, Marc-Andre
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (05) : 933 - 942