Why should HCWs receive priority access to vaccines in a pandemic?

被引:7
|
作者
Symons, Xavier [1 ]
Matthews, Steve [1 ,2 ]
Tobin, Bernadette [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic Univ, Plunkett Ctr Eth, 7 Ice St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] Thomas More Law Sch, Level 7,486 Albert St, East Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
关键词
COVID-19; Vaccines; Healthcare resource allocation; Reciprocity; Utilitarianism; Deontology; Policy; INFLUENZA; PRINCIPLES; RESOURCES; ETHICS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-021-00650-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Viral pandemics present a range of ethical challenges for policy makers, not the least among which are difficult decisions about how to allocate scarce healthcare resources. One important question is whether healthcare workers (HCWs) should receive priority access to a vaccine in the event that an effective vaccine becomes available. This question is especially relevant in the coronavirus pandemic with governments and health authorities currently facing questions of distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. Main text In this article, we critically evaluate the most common ethical arguments for granting healthcare workers priority access to a vaccine. We review the existing literature on this topic, and analyse both deontological and utilitarian arguments in favour of HCW prioritisation. For illustrative purposes, we focus in particular on the distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine. We also explore some practical complexities attendant on arguments in favour of HCW prioritisation. Conclusions We argue that there are deontological and utilitarian cases for prioritising HCWs. Indeed, the widely held view that we should prioritise HCWs represents an example of ethical convergence. Complexities arise, however, when considering who should be included in the category of HCW, and who else should receive priority in addition to HCWs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Should Health Care Providers Get Treatment Priority in an Influenza Pandemic?
    Rothstein, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2010, 38 (02): : 412 - 419
  • [32] WHY EARLY ACCESS PRICE SHOULD BE ANALYZED WITH CAUTION?
    Coudray, C.
    Gaugy, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S655 - S655
  • [33] Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia - Recommendations of 3 community juries
    Degeling, C.
    Williams, J.
    Carter, S. M.
    Moss, R.
    Massey, P.
    Gilbert, G. L.
    Shih, P.
    Braunack-Mayer, A.
    Crooks, K.
    Brown, D.
    McVernon, J.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2021, 39 (02) : 255 - 262
  • [34] Priority setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: going beyond vaccines
    Williams, Iestyn
    Essue, Beverley
    Nouvet, Elysee
    Sandman, Lars
    Razavi, S. Donya
    Noorulhuda, Mariam
    Goold, Susan
    Danis, Marion
    Biemba, Godfrey
    Abelson, Julia
    Kapiriri, Lydia
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (01):
  • [35] Half of public think weekend access to GPs should be NHS priority
    Moberly, Tom
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [36] Why should Brazil give priority to depression treatment in health resource allocation?
    Razzouk, Denise
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIA E SERVICOS DE SAUDE, 2016, 25 (04): : 845 - 848
  • [37] Filling cracks of the foundation: Why K-12 outreach should be a priority
    Barnes, Haley
    [J]. AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2017, 96 (05): : 37 - 37
  • [38] Why you should share your data during a pandemic
    Smith, Emily R.
    Flaherman, Valerie J.
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (03):
  • [39] THE UNCLOGGED BOTTLENECK - WHY COMPETITIVE ACCESS SHOULD NOT BE AN ANTITRUST CONCERN
    KLEIT, AN
    [J]. LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 1990, 26 (03): : 229 - 247
  • [40] Greater access to transplantation should be a priority: A view of the Dialysis PATIENTS Demonstration Act
    Becker, Bryan N.
    Nissenson, Allen R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 (04) : 995 - 997