Effect of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score on the Triage Performance in Patients With Chest Pain

被引:11
|
作者
Zaboli, Arian [1 ]
Ausserhofer, Dietmar [2 ,3 ]
Sibilio, Serena [1 ]
Toccolini, Elia [1 ]
Bonora, Antonio [4 ]
Giudiceandrea, Alberto [1 ]
Rella, Eleonora [1 ]
Paulmichl, Rupert [5 ]
Pfeifer, Norbert [1 ]
Turcato, Gianni [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Merano SABES ASDAA, Emergency Dept, Merano, Italy
[2] Coll Hlth Care Profess Claudiana, Bolzano, Italy
[3] Univ Basel, Inst Nursing Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Azienda Osped Univ Integrata, Hosp Civile Maggiore, Dept Emergency Med, Verona, Italy
[5] Hosp Merano SABES ASDAA, Dept Cardiol, Merano, Italy
来源
关键词
HEART; VALIDATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.058
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The sensitivity of triage systems in identifying acute cardiovascular events in patients presented to the emergency department with chest pain is not optimal. Recently, a clinical score, the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS), has been proposed for a rapid assessment without additional instruments. To evaluate whether the integration of EDACS into triage evaluation of patients with chest pain can improve the triage's predictive validity for an acute cardiovascular event, a single-center prospective observational study was conducted. This study involved all patients who needed a triage admission for chest pain between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. All enrolled patients first underwent a standard triage assessment and then the EDACS was calculated. The primary outcome of the study was the presence of an acute cardiovascular event. The discriminatory ability of EDACS in triage compared with standard triage assessment was evaluated by comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve analysis, and net reclassification improvement. The study involved 1,596 patients, of that 7.3% presented the study outcome. The discriminatory ability of triage presented an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.688 that increased to 0.818 after the application of EDACS in the triage assessment. EDACS improved the baseline assessment of priority assigned in triage, with a net reclassification improvement of 33.6% (p <0.001), and the decision curve analyses demonstrated that EDACS in triage resulted in a clear net clinical benefit. In conclusion, the results of the study suggest that EDACS has a good discriminatory capacity for acute cardiovascular events and that its implementation in routine triage may improve triage performance in patients with chest pain. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2021;161:12-18)
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 18
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using the HEART score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department of Kosovo as an important triage criterion for treatment and hospitalization
    Rashiti, Premtim
    Rashiti-Bytyci, Albiona
    Haradinaj, Kadri
    Dermaku, Erolind
    Berisha, Valdet
    Bellanica, Valon
    Svarca, Leonora
    Haklaj, Vjollca
    Lahu, Vendenis
    Duraku, Egzon
    Shabani, Afrim
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 85 (07): : 3318 - 3322
  • [22] Assessment and management of chest pain in the septuagenarian population in the emergency department chest pain unit setting
    Raghavan, AV
    Decker, WW
    Lohse, CM
    Lobl, JK
    Laudon, DA
    Smars, PA
    Gibbons, RJ
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (03) : S43 - S43
  • [23] Do Patients with Chest Pain Benefit from Installing Triage System in Emergency Department?
    Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Seyedhossein
    Asle-Soleimani, Hossein
    Hossein-Nejed, Hooman
    Jafarbaghdadi, Reza
    ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 2 (01)
  • [24] Utility of stress echocardiography in the triage of patients with atypical chest pain from the emergency department
    Colon, PJ
    Guarisco, JS
    Murgo, J
    Cheirif, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (10): : 1282 - +
  • [25] Triage of Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: Where Should We Set the Bar?
    Diercks, Deborah B.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 53 (06) : 746 - 747
  • [26] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE DUKE TREADMILL SCORE FOR EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS WITH CHEST PAIN
    Manini, Alex F.
    McAfee, Andrew T.
    Noble, Vicki E.
    Bohan, J. Stephen
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 39 (02): : 135 - 142
  • [27] Prognostic Utility of a Modified HEART Score in Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department
    McCord, James
    Cabrera, Rafael
    Lindahl, Bertil
    Giannitsis, Evangelos
    Evans, Kaleigh
    Nowak, Richard
    Frisoli, Tiberio
    Body, Richard
    Christ, Michael
    deFilippi, Christopher R.
    Christenson, Robert H.
    Jacobsen, Gordon
    Alquezar, Aitor
    Panteghini, Mauro
    Melki, Dina
    Plebani, Mario
    Verschuren, Franck
    French, John
    Bendig, Garnet
    Weiser, Silvia
    Mueller, Christian
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2017, 10 (02):
  • [28] Emergency Department Volume and Outcomes for Patients After Chest Pain Assessment
    Ko, Dennis T.
    Dattani, Neil D.
    Austin, Peter C.
    Schull, Michael J.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
    Tu, Jack V.
    Eberg, Maria
    Koh, Maria
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2018, 11 (11): : e004683
  • [29] Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department
    Kim, Min Jae
    Ha, Sang Ook
    Park, Young Sun
    Yi, Jeong Hyeon
    Yang, Won Seok
    Kim, Jin Hyuck
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 8 (04): : 279 - 288
  • [30] HEART plus score: integrating carotid ultrasound to chest pain assessment in the emergency department
    Hetu, Marie-France
    Brooks, Steven C.
    Chan, Winnie
    Herr, Julia E.
    Sivilotti, Marco L. A.
    O'Callaghan, Nicole
    Latiu, Vlad
    Newbigging, Joseph
    Day, Andrew G.
    Norman, Patrick A.
    Hill, Braeden
    Johri, Amer M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 26 (07) : 482 - 487