Social Robots for Social Institutions: Scaling up and Cutting Back on Cognition

被引:0
|
作者
Brinck, Ingar [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Philosophy & Cognit Sci, Box 192, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ROBOPHILOSOPHY - SOCIAL ROBOTS IN SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS | 2022年 / 366卷
关键词
robot rights; institutional approach; legal implications of technological innovations; legal innovation; legal design; PHYSICALLY PRESENT; INTERACTIVITY;
D O I
10.3233/FAIA220667
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Current technological change is rapid and far-reaching, more so than ever before in human history. It is transforming all dimensions of human life, leading to large-scale adaptation. Among the disruptive new technologies that are being introduced into society, social robots are distinguished by their hybrid existence between mere thing and mindful agent. They are physical machines capable of interacting with the surroundings and designed to collaborate with humans on human tasks while interacting in human ways. In contrast to rescue, delivery, and patrol robots that replace human labour, these robots take social roles such as tutor, peer, learner, companion, or assistant. On a more general note, social robots are expected to work closely with humans-as partner, colleague, family, and friend. Yet, that a robot can act as a social entity, does not entail the robot constitutes a social being in its own right [1]. The question is whether social robots are capable of participating in and contributing to human social institutions such as healthcare, education, and economy; and if this is so, the follow-up question concerns what this may entail for society in the longer perspective. The emphasis of the present talk lies on the first question, the supposed contribution of social robots to social institutions. Raising a few queries concerning the ability of the BDI-paradigm and affective robotics to provide an adequate reply to this question, at least in its present formulation, I will briefly outline an alternative that lays down a new path in HRI, based in the notions of embodied, embedded, dynamic, and distributed cognition. I claim that these notions are particularly well-suited for designing social institutional forms of HRI, because they permit modelling the relevant cognitive processes as unfolding in the physical space that humans and robots share. The environment provides the resources for HRI such as artefacts, routines, and embodied social norms that simultaneously constrain and enable the emergence of novel institutional practices involving human and machine.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 620
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Social cognition
    Bargh, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 295 - 295
  • [42] Social cognition
    Seyfarth, Robert M.
    Cheney, Dorothy L.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 103 : 191 - 202
  • [43] Social cognition
    Frith, Chris D.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 363 (1499) : 2033 - 2039
  • [44] SOCIAL COGNITION
    SCHNEIDER, DJ
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 42 : 527 - 561
  • [45] Social Cognition
    Yadav, Richa
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 10 (02) : 172 - 174
  • [46] Social cognition
    Zuberbuhler, Klaus
    Byrne, Richard W.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (18) : R786 - R790
  • [47] International Expansion of Social Enterprises as a Catalyst for Scaling up Social Impact across Borders
    Bretos, Ignacio
    Diaz-Foncea, Millan
    Marcuello, Carmen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [48] SOCIAL ROBOTS
    Lathan, Corinna E.
    Ling, Geoffrey
    SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2019, 321 (06) : 30 - 30
  • [49] Scaling Up Social Problems: Strategies for Solving Social Work's Grand Challenges
    Rodriguez, Maria Y.
    Ostrow, Laysha
    Kemp, Susan P.
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2017, 27 (02) : 139 - 149
  • [50] SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS
    不详
    SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 1930, 14 (03): : 281 - 281