Randomised Controlled Trials for Informing Perinatal Care

被引:14
|
作者
Gale, Chris [1 ]
McGuire, William [2 ]
Juszczak, Edmund [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sect Neonatal Med, Chelsea & Westminster Campus, London, England
[2] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Unit, Old Rd Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Neonatal care; Clinical trials; Randomisation; Pragmatic trials; ENRICHED INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN; NEONATAL SEPSIS; MANAGEMENT; OXYGEN; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1159/000499881
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Randomised controlled trials provide the best evidence for the effects of interventions and are a key tool in the effort to improve the care and outcomes for newborn infants. Methods: We discuss the role of randomisation for minimising selection bias in clinical trials and describe examples of seminal trials that have shaped the development of modern perinatal care. We consider the challenges inherent in designing and delivering large, simple, and pragmatic trials, and the need for the development and adoption of core outcome sets to ensure that trials provide high-quality evidence of sufficient validity and applicability to guide policy and practice. Results: Since the earliest days of modern neonatology, the randomised controlled trial has been recognised as the best method for assessing treatments and practices. While many strategies that reduce mortality and morbidity have been introduced following randomised trials, there are, however, important examples of ineffective or potentially harmful practices that have been adopted in the absence of trial-based evidence. Typically, randomised controlled trials in perinatal care need to recruit several thousand participants to be able to detect modest but potentially important effects of new interventions on the most important but rare outcomes. Given the concerns about the financial burden and regulatory complexity of standard trial designs, innovative "efficient" trial designs are being evaluated to streamline processes while safeguarding participants. Conclusions: Well-conducted randomised controlled trials provide the most robust evaluation of interventions aimed at improving outcomes for newborn infants and their families. Increasingly, these trials will need to be large and multicentre (often international) and use a simple and pragmatic protocol, incorporating meticulous follow-up procedures and assessment of long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 14
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in burns care. A systematic review
    Danilla, Stefan
    Wasiak, Jason
    Searle, Susana
    Arriagada, Cristian
    Pedreros, Cesar
    Cleland, Heather
    Spinks, Anneliese
    [J]. BURNS, 2009, 35 (07) : 956 - 961
  • [42] Searching for the evidence in pre-hospital care: a review of randomised controlled trials
    Brazier, H
    Murphy, AW
    Lynch, C
    Bury, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 16 (01): : 18 - 22
  • [43] Randomised controlled trials of videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy on intensive care are needed
    F. E. Kelly
    T. M. Cook
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2014, 40 : 765 - 765
  • [44] Meta-analyses versus randomised controlled trials in intensive care medicine
    L. Brazzi
    G. Bertolini
    C. Minelli
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2000, 26 : 239 - 241
  • [45] Randomised controlled trials of videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy on intensive care are needed
    Kelly, F. E.
    Cook, T. M.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 40 (05) : 765 - 765
  • [46] Interventions for improving teamwork in intrapartum care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Wu, Michael
    Tang, Jennifer
    Etherington, Nicole
    Walker, Mark
    Boet, Sylvain
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2020, 29 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [47] Models in the delivery of depression care: A systematic review of randomised and controlled intervention trials
    Christensen, Helen
    Griffiths, Kathleen M.
    Gulliver, Amelia
    Clack, Dannielle
    Kljakovic, Marjan
    Wells, Leanne
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [48] It was a snap decision: Parental and professional perspectives on the speed of decisions about participation in perinatal randomised controlled trials
    Snowdon, C
    Elbourne, D
    Garcia, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 62 (09) : 2279 - 2290
  • [49] Meta-analyses versus randomised controlled trials in intensive care medicine
    Brazzi, L
    Bertolini, G
    Minelli, C
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 26 (02) : 239 - 241
  • [50] Models in the delivery of depression care: A systematic review of randomised and controlled intervention trials
    Helen Christensen
    Kathleen M Griffiths
    Amelia Gulliver
    Dannielle Clack
    Marjan Kljakovic
    Leanne Wells
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 9