Interactions between a Trawl Fishery and Spatial Closures for Biodiversity Conservation in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, Australia

被引:16
|
作者
Grech, Alana [1 ,2 ]
Coles, Rob [1 ]
机构
[1] Fisheries Queensland, Dept Employment Econ Dev & Innovat, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Australian Res Council, Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2011年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
MARINE RESERVES; FISHING EFFORT; HABITATS; PARK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0021094
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The Queensland East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery (ECOTF) for penaeid shrimp fishes within Australia's Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA). The past decade has seen the implementation of conservation and fisheries management strategies to reduce the impact of the ECOTF on the seabed and improve biodiversity conservation. New information from electronic vessel location monitoring systems (VMS) provides an opportunity to review the interactions between the ECOTF and spatial closures for biodiversity conservation. Methodology and Results: We used fishing metrics and spatial information on the distribution of closures and modelled VMS data in a geographical information system (GIS) to assess change in effort of the trawl fishery from 2001-2009 and to quantify the exposure of 70 reef, non-reef and deep water bioregions to trawl fishing. The number of trawlers and the number of days fished almost halved between 2001 and 2009 and new spatial closures introduced in 2004 reduced the area zoned available for trawl fishing by 33%. However, we found that there was only a relatively minor change in the spatial footprint of the fishery as a result of new spatial closures. Non-reef bioregions benefited the most from new spatial closures followed by deep and reef bioregions. Conclusions/Significance: Although the catch of non target species remains an issue of concern for fisheries management, the small spatial footprint of the ECOTF relative to the size of the GBRWHA means that the impact on benthic habitats is likely to be negligible. The decline in effort as a result of fishing industry structural adjustment, increasing variable costs and business decisions of fishers is likely to continue a trend to fish only in the most productive areas. This will provide protection for most benthic habitats without any further legislative or management intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Water quality guidelines for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: a basis for development and preliminary values
    Moss, A
    Brodie, J
    Furnas, M
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2005, 51 (1-4) : 76 - 88
  • [22] Rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: does it afford greater protection for marine turtles?
    Dryden, Jennifer
    Grech, Alana
    Moloney, James
    Hamann, Mark
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (05) : 477 - 485
  • [23] Influence of Social, Biophysical, and Managerial Conditions on Tourism Experiences Within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
    C. Scott Shafer
    Graeme J. Inglis
    Environmental Management, 2000, 26 : 73 - 87
  • [24] Influence of social, biophysical, and managerial conditions on tourism experiences within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
    Shafer, CS
    Inglis, GJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (01) : 73 - 87
  • [25] Pesticide and herbicide residues in sediments and seagrasses from the Great Barrier Reef world heritage area and Queensland coast
    Haynes, D
    Müller, J
    Carter, S
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2000, 41 (7-12) : 279 - 287
  • [26] The influence of a season of extreme wet weather events on exposure of the World Heritage Area Great Barrier Reef to pesticides
    Kennedy, Karen
    Devlin, Michelle
    Bentley, Christie
    Lee-Chue, Kristie
    Paxman, Chris
    Carter, Steve
    Lewis, Stephen E.
    Brodie, Jon
    Guy, Ellia
    Vardy, Suzanne
    Martin, Katherine C.
    Jones, Alison
    Packett, Robert
    Mueller, Jochen F.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2012, 64 (07) : 1495 - 1507
  • [27] The 25 Year Strategic Plan for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: A model for strategic planning in the Wadden Sea Area?
    Cansfield-Smith T.
    Senckenbergiana maritima, 1998, 29 (1-6): : 165 - 171
  • [28] The significance of environmental values for destination competitiveness and sustainable tourism strategy making: insights from Australia's Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
    Esparon, Michelle
    Stoeckl, Natalie
    Farr, Marina
    Larson, Silva
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2015, 23 (05) : 706 - 725
  • [29] Exploring the effect of sampling, protogyny, and larval advection on stock estimates subject to no-take closures in a spatially complex coral reef line fishery on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    Little, L. Richard
    Punt, Andre E.
    Tuck, Geoffrey N.
    Mapstone, Bruce D.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2017, 74 (11) : 1950 - 1959
  • [30] Water quality in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: Past perspectives, current issues and new research directions
    Haynes, D
    Michalek-Wagner, K
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2000, 41 (7-12) : 428 - 434