Comparison of Factors Affecting Crash Severities in Hit-and-Run and Non-Hit-and-Run Crashes

被引:9
|
作者
Zhou, Bei [1 ]
Li, Zongzhi [2 ]
Zhang, Shengrui [1 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Sch Highway, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] IIT, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; INJURY SEVERITY; VEHICLE CRASHES; HYBRID APPROACH; PEDESTRIAN HIT; MOTOR-VEHICLE; HETEROGENEITY; ACCIDENTS; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1155/2018/8537131
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A hit-and-run (HR) crash occurs when the driver of the offending vehicle flees the crash scene without reporting it or aiding the victims. The current study aimed at contributing to existing literatures by comparing factors which might affect the crash severity in HR and non-hit-and-run (NHR) crashes. The data was extracted from the police-reported crash data from September 2017 to August 2018 within the City of Chicago. Two multinomial logistic regression models were established for the HR and NHR crash data, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) of each variable was used to quantify the impact of this variable on the crash severity. In both models, the property damage only (PDO) crash was selected as the reference group, and the injury and fatal crash were chosen as the comparison group. When the injury crash was taken as the comparison group, it was found that 12 variables contributed to the crash severities in both HR and NHR model. The average percentage deviation of OR for these 12 variables was 34%, indicating that compared with property damage, HR crashes were 34% more likely to result in injuries than NHR crashes on average. When fatal crashes were chosen as the comparison group, 2 variables were found to be statistically significant in both the HR and the NHR model. The average percentage deviation of OR for these 2 variables was 127%, indicating that compared with property damage, HR crashes were 127% more likely to result in fatalities than NHR crashes on average.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] IMPROVING HIT-AND-RUN FOR GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION
    ZABINSKY, ZB
    SMITH, RL
    MCDONALD, JF
    ROMEIJN, HE
    KAUFMAN, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 1993, 3 (02) : 171 - 192
  • [42] Clouds for Hit-and-Run Wireless Attacks
    Li, J. Jenny
    Neto, Fernando
    Liou, Jingchiou
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA SECURITY ON CLOUD (BIGDATASECURITY), IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE AND SMART COMPUTING (HPSC), AND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT DATA AND SECURITY (IDS), 2016, : 67 - 72
  • [43] Identifying nonlinear effects of factors on hit-and-run crashes using interpretable machine learning techniques
    Xu, Liang
    Ren, Yilong
    Yu, Haiyang
    Wang, Kun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2024,
  • [44] A case of 'hit-and-run' in Plasmodium genetics
    Gardiner, Donald L.
    Good, Michael F.
    [J]. TRENDS IN PARASITOLOGY, 2006, 22 (11) : 493 - 495
  • [45] Positivity of hit-and-run and related algorithms
    Rudolf, Daniel
    Ullrich, Mario
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS IN PROBABILITY, 2013, 18 : 1 - 8
  • [46] Factors associated with hit-and-run pedestrian fatalities and driver identification
    MacLeod, Kara E.
    Griswold, Julia B.
    Arnold, Lindsay S.
    Ragland, David R.
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2012, 45 : 366 - 372
  • [47] COMPARISON OF HIT-AND-RUN, SLICE SAMPLER AND RANDOM WALK METROPOLIS
    Rudolf, Daniel
    Ullrich, Mario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2018, 55 (04) : 1186 - 1202
  • [48] Hit-and-Run for Sampling and Planning in Non-Convex Spaces
    Abbasi-Yadkori, Yasin
    Bartlett, Peter L.
    Gabillon, Victor
    Malek, Alan
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 54, 2017, 54 : 888 - 895
  • [49] EVIDENCE OF A HIT-AND-RUN TUMOR-VIRUS
    NEWMARK, P
    [J]. NATURE, 1983, 303 (5916) : 383 - 383
  • [50] Robust stabilization via Hit-and-Run techniques
    Polyak, B. T.
    Gryazina, E. N.
    [J]. 2009 IEEE CONTROL APPLICATIONS CCA & INTELLIGENT CONTROL (ISIC), VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 537 - 541