Women and fisheries co-management: Limits to participation on Lake Victoria

被引:11
|
作者
Nunan, Fiona [1 ]
Cepic, Drazen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Zadar, Zadar, Croatia
关键词
Women; Co-management; Fisheries; Lake Victoria; MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; GENDER; MANAGEMENT; INSTITUTIONS; PATRIARCHY; MOBILITY; RULES; ROLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105454
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Despite women making up about half of the global fisheries workforce, it is believed that women are much less involved in community-based fisheries management than men. There is, however, limited evidence available on the extent and nature of their involvement. This paper responds to the gap by asking how representation of women is working in fisheries co-management, what the effects of their representation and participation are and by identifying constraints on their effective participation. Lake Victoria, East Africa, is an example of a fisheries co-management system with a quota set for the minimum inclusion of women in community-based structures. Research undertaken in the three countries bordering the lake, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, found that participation of women in fisheries co-management committees has generally been accepted at the landing site level. The participation of women allows different networks to be represented and reached and examples were given of advocacy and initiatives to strengthen women's livelihoods through representation in co-management committees. However, although the quota system was often complied with, and support for women's participation expressed, the effective participation of women is limited by prevailing gendered norms and relations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Documenting fisheries co-management in action: Case of the Grand Cape Mount County Co-Management Association, Liberia
    Livingstone, Olivia
    Anthony, Brandon P.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2023, 157
  • [32] The implications for participatory fisheries management of intensified commercialization on Lake Victoria
    Wilson, DC
    Medard, M
    Harris, CK
    Wiley, DS
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 1999, 64 (04) : 554 - 572
  • [33] Danish fisheries co-management decision making and alternative management systems
    Nielsen, JR
    Vedsmand, T
    Friis, P
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 35 (2-3) : 201 - 216
  • [34] Cooperative research, co-management and the social dimension of fisheries science and management
    Kaplan, IM
    McCay, BJ
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2004, 28 (03) : 257 - 258
  • [35] Co-management of coastal fisheries resources in tropical and subtropical regions
    Kakuma, S
    [J]. MANGROVE MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION: PRESENT AND FUTURE, 2004, : 208 - 218
  • [36] Analysis of Power in Fisheries Co-Management: Experiences from Malawi
    Njaya, Friday
    Donda, Steve
    Bene, Christophe
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 25 (07) : 652 - 666
  • [37] Achieving Sustainability in US Fisheries: Community Engagement in Co-Management
    May, Candace K.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 16 (06) : 390 - 400
  • [38] Co-management in marine fisheries in Malalison Island, central Philippines
    Baticados, DB
    Agbayani, RF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2000, 7 (04): : 343 - 355
  • [39] Step zero for fisheries co-management: What precedes implementation
    Chuenpagdee, Ratana
    Jentoft, Svein
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2007, 31 (06) : 657 - 668
  • [40] Tracing innovation pathways behind fisheries co-management in Vanuatu
    Dirk J. Steenbergen
    Jacob Raubani
    Sompert Gereva
    William Naviti
    Christopher Arthur
    Ajay Arudere
    Jayven Ham
    Lucy Joy
    Watisoni Lalavanua
    Pita Neihapi
    Akiya Seko
    Hiroaki Terashima
    Neil L. Andrew
    [J]. Ambio, 2022, 51 : 2359 - 2375