Modeling effects of herbicide drift on the competitive interactions between weeds

被引:0
|
作者
Damgaard, Christian [1 ]
Mathiassen, Solvejg Kopp [2 ]
Kudsk, Per [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aarhus, Dept Terr Ecol, Natl Environm Res Inst, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
[2] Univ Aarhus, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Integrated Pest Management, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
关键词
mecoprop; herbicide; Geranium dissectum; Capsella bursa-pastoris; plant community dynamics;
D O I
10.1897/07-267.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Herbicides may drift onto road verges or natural areas adjacent to arable fields and affect nontarget plants. The effect of low doses of mecoprop-P on the competitive interaations and plant community dynamics was investigated in a model system using Capsella bursa-pastoris and Geranium dissectum as test plants. Dose-response experiments on single species showed that compared to G. dissectum, C. bursa-pastoris was more affected by mecoprop-P. Consequently, we expected that G. dissectum would outcompete C. bursa-pastoris when mecoprop-P was applied at a low dose in the competition experiment. Indeed, mecoprop-P had a significant effect on the interspecific competitive ability of both C. bursa-pastoris and G. dissectum. Our previous expectation, however, was not met: The interspecific competitive ability of both species increased significantly with the dose of the herbicide, and it was predicted that C. bursa-pastoris and G. dissection are more likely to coexist in natural habitats with low concentrations of the herbicide compared to natural habitats with relatively high concentrations. The results from the dose-response experiments on the single species and the more laborious competition experiment approach, which is assumed to mimic the dynamics of plant communities more closely, show considerable discrepancies even though the experiments were performed at the same time and in the same greenhouse. This finding generally reduces the credibility of using single-species tests in ecological risk assessment of herbicide use.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1308
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF WEEDS ON THE GROWTH OF CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS
    BERCHIELLIROBERTSON, DL
    GILLIAM, CH
    FARE, DC
    HORTSCIENCE, 1990, 25 (01) : 77 - 79
  • [32] Investigation of biochemical and competitive effects of cover crops on crops and weeds
    Rueda-Ayala, Victor
    Jaeck, Ortrud
    Gerhards, Roland
    CROP PROTECTION, 2015, 71 : 79 - 87
  • [33] Interaction between herbicide and insecticide on popcorn (Zea mays), weeds and fall armyworm
    Silva, A. A.
    Jakelaitis, A.
    Freitas, F. M.
    Ferreira, L. R.
    Vivian, R.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2007, 25 (01) : 181 - 186
  • [34] Species prevalence and plant traits discriminate between herbicide resistant and susceptible weeds
    Hulme, Philip E.
    Liu, Wenting
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 78 (01) : 313 - 320
  • [35] NONLETHAL EFFECTS OF A PREDATOR ON COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN 2 ANURAN LARVAE
    WERNER, EE
    ECOLOGY, 1991, 72 (05) : 1709 - 1720
  • [36] Assessment of the effects of reduced herbicide applications on selected arable weeds by a simulation model
    Sonderskov, Mette
    Axelsen, Jorgen A.
    Pedersen, Marianne Bruus
    Tybirk, Knud
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 116 (3-4) : 216 - 224
  • [37] Effects of Combined and Separate Herbicide Application on Rapeseed and its Weeds in Southern Iran
    Miri, Hamid Reza
    Rahimi, Yarali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 11 (03) : 257 - 260
  • [38] Interactions between glyphosate and imazethapyr on four annual weeds
    Li, JM
    Johnson, WG
    Smeda, RJ
    CROP PROTECTION, 2002, 21 (10) : 1087 - 1092
  • [39] SOIL MICROORGANISMS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN WEEDS AND CROPS
    Massenssini, A. M.
    Bonduki, V. H. A.
    Melo, C. A. D.
    Totola, M. R.
    Ferreira, F. A.
    Costa, M. D.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2014, 32 (04) : 873 - 884
  • [40] Modeling online user behaviors with competitive interactions
    He, Saike
    Zheng, Xiaolong
    Zeng, Daniel Dajun
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 56 (04) : 463 - 475