Do cross-border and domestic bidding firms perform differently? New evidence from continental Europe and the UK

被引:18
|
作者
Mateev, Miroslav [1 ]
Andonov, Kristiyan [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Bulgaria, 1 G Izmirliev Sq, Blagoevgrad 2700, Bulgaria
[2] Protrade Mega Grp Ltd, 52 Vitosha St, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria
关键词
Mergers and acquisitions; Cross-border takeovers; Bid premium; Corporate governance; FREE CASH FLOW; CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS; SHAREHOLDER BENEFITS; RETURNS; MERGERS; MARKET; GAINS; PRIVATE; INVESTMENT; ACQUIRERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper we investigate the main features of the domestic and cross-border corporate acquisitions involving 38 European countries in the period 2003-2010. The analysis is based on characteristics of takeover transactions such as type of transaction, payment method, legal status of the target firm, activity relatedness, amongst other factors. In addition, we investigate the short-term wealth effects of 2821 European mergers and acquisitions initiated by large and medium-sized European firms. We find that, upon announcement, domestic acquiring firms earn higher abnormal returns than cross-border bidders. Domestic bidders' outperformance holds even when controlling for different bid and firm characteristics such as method of payment, type of transaction, public status of the target firm, and activity relatedness of the target and the bidder. We find larger short-term wealth effect of foreign firms bidding on Continental European targets than those of foreign firms acquiring companies in the UK/Ireland. Our analysis shows that cross-border bidding firms tend to experience lower announcement returns when targets are located in countries with stronger investor protection mechanisms, suggesting that acquirers must compensate target firm shareholders (that is, pay higher premiums) if the quality of the corporate governance is reduced. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 349
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does managerial ability matter for cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese listed firms
    Xu, Xiaohui
    Wang, Fang
    Chen, Xiaohua
    Yang, Gaoju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2021, 74
  • [32] How does liability of origin influence cross-border acquisition completion? Evidence from Chinese firms
    Jiang, Tingting
    Yang, Buyun
    Yang, Bo
    Wu, Bo
    Wan, Guoguang
    [J]. CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2022, 16 (04) : 857 - 884
  • [33] Cross-border regulatory cooperation and cash holdings: Evidence from US-listed foreign firms
    Chang, Yuyuan
    He, Wen
    Mi, Lin
    [J]. BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2024, 56 (06):
  • [34] THE EVOLUTION OF CROSS-BORDER M&As AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY FIRMS
    Lyu, Guoqing
    Liefner, Ingo
    Schiller, Daniel
    [J]. ERDKUNDE, 2019, 73 (03) : 211 - 224
  • [35] Are proactive outbound cross-border mergers and acquisitions effective for firms' R&D? New evidence from emerging market enterprises
    Wu, Xianming
    Wang, Maoqiong
    Cui, Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 30 (04)
  • [36] Environmental regulation and the cross-border diffusion of new technology: Evidence from automobile patents
    Dechezlepretre, Antoine
    Neumayer, Eric
    Perkins, Richard
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (01) : 244 - 257
  • [37] REGION-MAKING AND CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION: NEW EVIDENCE FROM FOUR CONTINENTS
    Juzova, Jana
    [J]. POLITOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, (01): : 74 - 76
  • [39] Does Fintech facilitate cross-border M&As? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms
    Wang, Yichen
    Hu, Jun
    Chen, Jia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 85
  • [40] How does economic policy uncertainty affect cross-border M&A: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Li, Wanli
    Su, Yueying
    Wang, Kaixiu
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2022, 52