Performance Comparison of Multiwavelet and Multicontourlet Frame Based Features for Improving Classification Accuracy in Remote Sensing Images

被引:1
|
作者
Venkateswaran, K. [1 ]
Kasthuri, N. [1 ]
Kousika, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kongu Engn Coll, Perundurai, Erode, India
关键词
Feature extraction; Multiwavelet transform; Stationary multiwavelet transform; Multicontourlet transform; Principal component analysis; Accuracy assessment; WAVELET;
D O I
10.1007/s12524-016-0655-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scalar wavelet based contourlet frame based features are used for improving the classification of remote sensing images. Multiwavelet an extension to scalar wavelets provides higher degree of freedom, which possess two or more scaling function and wavelet function. Unlike scalar wavelets, which has single scaling and wavelet function. Multiwavelet satisfies several mathematical properties simultaneously such as orthogonality, compact support, linear phase symmetry and higher order approximation. The multiwavelets considered here are Geronimo-Hardin-Massopust (GHM) and Chui Lian (CL). In this paper the performance of GHM and CL multiwavelet is compared. Finally CL based multicontourlet frame based features are used for improving the classification accuracy of remote sensing images as it has directional filter banks. Principal component analysis based feature reduction is performed and Gaussian Kernel Fuzzy C means classifiers are used to improve the classification accuracy. The experimental results shows that the CL based multicontourlet overall accuracy is improved to 5.3% (for LISS-IV(i)), 2.09% (for LISS IV(ii)) 4.17% (for LISS IV(iii)) and 4.2% (for LISS IV-(iv)) the kappa coefficient is improved to 0.04 (for LISS IV-(i)), 0.029 (for LISS IV-(ii)), 0.031 (for LISS IV-(iii)) and 0.05 (for LISS IV-(iv)) compared to Wavelet based Contourlet transform.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 911
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Comparison of Multiwavelet and Multicontourlet Frame Based Features for Improving Classification Accuracy in Remote Sensing Images
    K. Venkateswaran
    N. Kasthuri
    N. Kousika
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2017, 45 : 903 - 911
  • [2] Performance Comparison of Wavelet and Contourlet Frame Based Features for Improving Classification Accuracy in Remote Sensing Images
    K. Venkateswaran
    N. Kasthuri
    R. A. Alaguraja
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2015, 43 : 729 - 737
  • [3] Performance Comparison of Wavelet and Contourlet Frame Based Features for Improving Classification Accuracy in Remote Sensing Images
    Venkateswaran, K.
    Kasthuri, N.
    Alaguraja, R. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 43 (04) : 729 - 737
  • [4] Multicontourlet-Based Adaptive Fusion of Infrared and Visible Remote Sensing Images
    Chang, Xia
    Jiao, Licheng
    Liu, Fang
    Xin, Fangfang
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2010, 7 (03) : 549 - 553
  • [5] Fusion of Deep Learning Models for Improving Classification Accuracy of Remote Sensing Images
    Deepan, P.
    Sudha, L. R.
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS OF CONTINUA AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 14 (05): : 189 - 201
  • [6] Surface biophysical features fusion in remote sensing for improving land crop/cover classification accuracy
    Fathololoumi, Solmaz
    Firozjaei, Mohammad Karimi
    Li, Huijie
    Biswas, Asim
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 838
  • [7] Feature Selection Method Based on High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images and the Effect of Sensitive Features on Classification Accuracy
    Zhou, Yi
    Zhang, Rui
    Wang, Shixin
    Wang, Futao
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (07)
  • [8] The accuracy test of several classification models of remote sensing images
    Han, L
    Wu, HN
    ISTM/2003: 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-6, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 4431 - 4434
  • [9] ASSESSING UNCERTAINTIES IN ACCURACY OF LANDUSE CLASSIFICATION USING REMOTE SENSING IMAGES
    Hsiao, Lin-Hsuan
    Cheng, Ke-Sheng
    8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPATIAL DATA QUALITY, 2013, 40-2 (w1): : 19 - 23
  • [10] A comparison of resampling methods for remote sensing classification and accuracy assessment
    Lyons, Mitchell B.
    Keith, David A.
    Phinn, Stuart R.
    Mason, Tanya J.
    Elith, Jane
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 208 : 145 - 153