Participatory methods in forest landscape level planning

被引:0
|
作者
Wallenius, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Forest Management, Metsahallitus, Vantaa, Finland
关键词
public participation; forest planning; social sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Social sustainability in management of publicly administrated natural resources requires good public participation methods which enables different views and goals to be taken into the planning process on the other hand and working systems to handle conflicting interests and to find out common largely accepted solutions on the other hand. Good function of these kinds of methods demand basic good information systems and effective use of public participation in co-operation. Increasing and often conflicting interests of natural resources should be managed together. To be able to create largely accepted solutions means wide collecting and delivery of information both in the planning process and in the implementation and follow up. Metsahallitus runs planning processes and usually makes final decisions, implements the plan and will arrange that co-operation continues also in the future when plans are evaluated together with stakeholders and the public. The public participation processes are usually at first designed by Metsahallitus specialists. In the first starting meetings the process is presented, discussed and changed if needed. Both public and interest groups are involved from the very beginning of the processes. Several different techniques are used, so that people would have some possibility to participate; open houses, information access points at the agency's customer service offices, public meetings, written comments opportunities, commenting opportunity via paid phone, employees personal contacts with individuals, delivered brochures and participation feedback forms. Public participation is advertised in the media, news and articles dealing with the process and possibility to participate. The brochures and other material clarify simplified way the process and everyone is able to participate and affect the plan. Nowadays co-operating groups representing local stakeholders play a key role in participation. These groups assess the current state of natural resources and their future management and use from different points of view. They also take a stand on the priority of various activities and various land use in the planning area during the planning period. The role of Metsahallitus has become more to organise the planning process, meetings and discussions between large group of interests.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 109
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Challenge of Governance in Regional Forest Planning: An Analysis of Participatory Forest Program Processes in Finland
    Saarikoski, Heli
    Akerman, Maria
    Primmer, Eeva
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 25 (07) : 667 - 682
  • [42] Does landscape related expertise influence the visual perception of landscape photographs? Implications for participatory landscape planning and management
    Dupont, Lien
    Antrop, Marc
    Van Eetvelde, Veerle
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2015, 141 : 68 - 77
  • [43] The participatory planning paradigm shift: Comparing disciplines and methods
    Le Roux, Jan-Hendrik
    Cilliers, Elizelle Juanee
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ISOCARP CONGRESS: FRONTIERS OF PLANNING - EVOLVING AND DECLINING MODELS OF PLANNING PRACTICE, 2013, : 869 - 880
  • [44] Evaluating a new participatory planning approach for sustainable landscape development in Switzerland -: participatory techniques and social effects of Landscape Development Concepts (LDC)
    Höppner, C
    Frick, J
    Buchecker, M
    Elsasser, H
    [J]. Sustainable Development and Planning II, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, 84 : 1329 - 1341
  • [45] Landscape and Urban Governance: Participatory Planning of the Public Realm in Saida, Lebanon
    Makhzoumi, Jala
    Al-Sabbagh, Salwa
    [J]. LAND, 2018, 7 (02)
  • [46] Participatory modeling for collaborative landscape and environmental planning: From potential to realization
    Zellner, Moira L.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 247
  • [47] Participatory Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Madrid: Insights for Landscape Planning
    Garcia-Diez, Victor
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    [J]. LAND, 2020, 9 (08)
  • [48] How to Improve Landscape and Environment in Czech Republic with Assistance of Participatory Planning
    Vitovska, D.
    [J]. II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HORTICULTURE IN EUROPE, 2015, 1099 : 977 - 983
  • [49] LANDSCAPE PARTICIPATORY PLANNING IN THE DIGITAL CITY: ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIALITIES IN CURITIBA, PARANA
    Martins de Araujo Klein, Regina Maria
    Antunes Hard, Leticia Peret
    Rezende, Denis Alcides
    [J]. REVISTA DE GESTAO E SECRETARIADO-GESEC, 2016, 7 (03): : 226 - 252
  • [50] Strategic multiresource planning of a Swedish boreal forest landscape
    Lämås, T
    Fries, C
    [J]. FOREST SCENARIO MODELLING FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AT LANDSCAPE LEVEL, 1998, (19): : 195 - 206