Hawthorne and the Mesmeric Arts

被引：0
|
作者：
Li, Rui [1 ]
Bu, Yu-wei [2 ]
机构：
[1] Shandong Univ Weihai, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol Weihai, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源：
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT (ICSSD 2017) | 2017年
关键词：
Nathaniel Hawthorne; Mesmerism; Imagination; Psychology;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
Mesmerism has a deep influence on Nathaniel Hawthorne's literary creation. On the one hand, Hawthorne disapproves of mesmerism because he believes it is an intrusion of one's personal psychology. On the other hand, Hawthorne is obsessed with the mesmeric arts in his literary works. Hawthorne not only designs the mesmerism plots in the romances to express his negative attitude towards mesmeric practice but also applies the mesmeric arts in order to guide the reader to gain the ultimate spiritual revelation.
引用
收藏
页码：73 / 77
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 'HAWTHORNE'
    FOGLE, RH
    [J]. CEA CRITIC, 1975, 38 (01) : 27 - 27
  • [22] Hawthorne
    Roggenkamp, Karen
    [J]. AMERICAN LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP, 2020, 2018 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [23] Hawthorne
    Roggenkamp, Karen
    [J]. AMERICAN LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP, 2016, 2014 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [24] Hawthorne
    Smith, Andrew M.
    Wright, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. AMERICAN LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP, 2009, 2007 (01) : 35 - 48
  • [25] 'HAWTHORNE'
    RIFENBURGH, D
    [J]. PARIS REVIEW, 1995, (135): : 46 - 47
  • [26] Hawthorne
    Smith, Andrew M.
    Wright, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. AMERICAN LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP, 2008, 2006 (01) : 33 - 52
  • [27] Hawthorne
    Mitchell, Thomas R.
    [J]. AMERICAN LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP, 2005, 2003 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [28] Hawthorne
    Roggenkamp, Karen
    [J]. AMERICAN LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP, 2019, 2017 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [29] Hawthorne
    Roggenkamp, Karen
    [J]. AMERICAN LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP, 2022, 2020 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [30] Hawthorne
    Smith, Andrew M.
    Wright, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. AMERICAN LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP, 2010, 2008 (01) : 29 - 41
12345