Polytomous logistic regression analysis could be applied more often in diagnostic research

被引:92
|
作者
Biesheuvel, C. J. [1 ,2 ]
Vergouwe, Y. [2 ]
Steyerberg, E. W. [3 ]
Grobbee, D. E. [2 ]
Moons, K. G. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Med Decis Making, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
diagnosis; prediction research; clinical decision making; polytomous regression modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Physicians commonly consider the presence of all differential diagnoses simultaneously. Polytomous logistic regression modeling allows for simultaneous estimation of the probability of multiple diagnoses. We discuss and (empirically) illustrate the value of this method for diagnostic research. Study Design and Setting: We used data from a study on the diagnosis of residual retroperitoneal mass histology in patients presenting with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumor. The differential diagnoses include benign tissue, mature teratoma, and viable cancer. Probabilities of each diagnosis were estimated with a polytomous logistic regression model and compared with the probabilities estimated from two consecutive dichotomous logistic regression models. Results: We provide interpretations of the odds ratios derived from the polytomous regression model and present a simple score chart to facilitate calculation of predicted probabilities from the polytomous model. For both modeling methods, we show the calibration plots and receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) areas comparing each diagnostic outcome category with the other two. The ROC areas for benign tissue, mature teratoma, and viable cancer were similar for both modeling methods, 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-0.85) vs. 0.83 (95% CI = 0.80-0.85), 0.78 (95% CI = 0.75-0.81) vs. 0.78 (95% CI = 0.75-0.81), and 0.66 (95% CI = 0.61-0.71) vs. 0.64 (95% CI = 0.59-0.69), for polytomous and dichotomous regression models, respectively. Conclusion: Polytomous logistic regression is a useful technique to simultaneously model predicted probabilities of multiple diagnostic outcome categories. The performance of a polytomous prediction model can be assessed similarly to a dichotomous logistic regression model, and predictions by a polytomous model can be made with a user-friendly method. Because the simultaneous consideration of the presence of multiple (differential) conditions serves clinical practice better than consideration of the presence of only one target condition, polytomous logistic regression could be applied more often in diagnostic research. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 134
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selective Citation Practices in Imaging Research: Are Diagnostic Accuracy Studies With Positive Titles and Conclusions Cited More Often?
    Treanor, Lee
    Frank, Robert A.
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Sharifabadi, Ana Dehmoobad
    McGrath, Trevor A.
    Kraaijpoel, Noemie
    Bossuyt, Patrick
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (02) : 397 - 403
  • [42] Testing a Model of Research Intention Among UK Clinical Psychologists: A Logistic Regression Analysis
    Eke, Gemma
    Holttum, Sue
    Hayward, Mark
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 68 (03) : 263 - 278
  • [43] Predicting research use in a public health policy environment: results of a logistic regression analysis
    Pauline Zardo
    Alex Collie
    Implementation Science, 9
  • [44] Predicting research use in a public health policy environment: results of a logistic regression analysis
    Zardo, Pauline
    Collie, Alex
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9 : 142
  • [45] Comparison of logistic regression and neural network analysis applied to predicting living setting after hip fracture
    Ottenbacher, KJ
    Linn, RT
    Smith, PM
    Illig, SB
    Mancuso, M
    Granger, CV
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (08) : 551 - 559
  • [46] ANALYSIS OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODEL AND HE4 IN THE PRESURGICAL ASSESMENT OF ADNEXAL MASSES
    Abdalla, N.
    Bachanek, M.
    Winiarek, J.
    Cendrowski, K.
    Sawicki, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 379 - 379
  • [47] Uncovering gene expression signatures and diagnostic - Biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma through multinomial logistic regression analysis
    Park, Ilkyu
    Lee, Hyo-Bin
    Kim, Nakyoung
    Lee, Sugi
    Park, Kunhyang
    Son, Mi-Young
    Cho, Hyun-Soo
    Kim, Dae-Soo
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 395 : 31 - 43
  • [48] Bivariate logistic regression model diagnostics applied to analysis of outlier cancer patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension in Malawi
    Tsirizani M. Kaombe
    Jonathan Chiwanda Banda
    Gracious A. Hamuza
    Adamson S. Muula
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [49] Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to Likelihood Function Maximization During Poisson, Logistic, and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis
    Peterson, Leif E.
    2014 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2014, : 1054 - 1061
  • [50] Bivariate logistic regression model diagnostics applied to analysis of outlier cancer patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension in Malawi
    Kaombe, Tsirizani M.
    Banda, Jonathan Chiwanda
    Hamuza, Gracious A.
    Muula, Adamson S.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)