Modelling the economic impact of international tourism on the Chinese economy: a CGE analysis of the Beijing 2008 Olympics

被引:61
|
作者
Li, ShiNa [1 ]
Blake, Adam [2 ]
Cooper, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Metropolitan Univ, UK Ctr Events Management, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Serv Management, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[3] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Business, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
关键词
economic impact; international tourism; Beijing; 2008; Olympics; CGE modelling; tourism policy;
D O I
10.5367/te.2011.0025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
International inbound tourism to China has grown phenomenally since 1980 and the hosting of the Olympics in 2008 was an important milestone. This paper takes the first step in applying computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelling to forecasting the economic contribution of tourism generated by the Beijing Olympics. CGE modelling has been widely applied to different tourism issues in many countries. In China, it has been used in fields such as taxation and international trade. However, economic impact studies on China's tourism using CGE modelling have not been found. The paper includes two types of estimations: ex ante and ex post. The ex ante estimation was conducted before the Beijing Olympics and thus predicted the impact of international tourism based on historical data, such as previous literature and historical statistics. The ex post estimation was conducted several months after the Beijing Olympics and the estimation was based on up-to-date statistics published by the China National Tourism Administration. The economic impact generated from the two types of estimations is compared. It was found that, while the economic impact of international tourism was predicted to be positive in the ex ante estimation, this impact was analysed as negative in the ex post estimation.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:279 / 303
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modelling the Impact of RCEP Agreement on the Economic and Trade Environment of Beijing
    Liu, Yuanqing
    Chen, Xiongying
    Tian, Yuan
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2022, 2022
  • [42] The impact of the 2008 German corporate tax reform: A dynamic CGE analysis
    Radulescu, Doina
    Stimmelmayr, Michael
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2010, 27 (01) : 454 - 467
  • [43] Discursive activism in the age of BBS: revisiting overseas Chinese protests during the 2008 Beijing Olympics torch relay
    Guo, Shaohua
    INTERNET HISTORIES, 2021, 5 (3-4): : 341 - 358
  • [44] Impact of Subsidy and Taxation Related to Biofuels Policies on the Economy of Thailand: A Dynamic CGE Modelling Approach
    Anuman Chanthawong
    Shobhakar Dhakal
    John K. M. Kuwornu
    Muhammad Khalid Farooq
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2020, 11 : 909 - 929
  • [45] Impact of Subsidy and Taxation Related to Biofuels Policies on the Economy of Thailand: A Dynamic CGE Modelling Approach
    Chanthawong, Anuman
    Dhakal, Shobhakar
    Kuwornu, John K. M.
    Farooq, Muhammad Khalid
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2020, 11 (03) : 909 - 929
  • [46] How Tariff Reduction Impact Global Economy- A CGE Analysis of Wood Economy of Pakistan
    Malik, Arshad Mahmood
    Khurshid, Nabila
    Rizwan, Muhammad
    FWU JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [47] Evidence-based regional economic policy analysis: the role of CGE modelling
    Giesecke, James A.
    Madden, John R.
    CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 6 (02) : 285 - 301
  • [48] Analysis of Impacts on China's Economy of 2008 Beijing Olympic Games
    Wang Li-ping
    2009 THIRD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 421 - 424
  • [49] Analysis of the Effect of Beijing's Rural Tourism on the Local Economic Growth
    Zhu Hui
    Liang Xuedong
    Li Zhi
    NEW THINKING FOR STRATEGY: GREEN, INNOVATION AND SHARING, 2017, : 901 - 906
  • [50] The economic effects of the fair tax: analysis of results of a dynamic CGE model of the US economy
    Bhattarai K.
    Haughton J.
    Tuerck D.G.
    International Economics and Economic Policy, 2016, 13 (3) : 451 - 466