Standardization of anal sphincter electromyography: Utility of motor unit potential parameters

被引:21
|
作者
Podnar, S [1 ]
Vodusek, DB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Med Ctr, Div Neurol, Inst Clin Neurophysiol, SI-1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
external anal sphincter muscle; motor unit potentials; needle electromyography; quantification; sensitivity;
D O I
10.1002/mus.1093.abs
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Advanced electromyography systems offer quantitative analysis of a number of motor unit potential (MUP) parameters. However, only limited data are available on the diagnostic usefulness of these parameters. In the present study, we compared the sensitivities of MUP parameters in revealing "neuropathic" changes in the external anal sphincter (EAS) muscles in 56 patients examined 5-240 months after damage to the cauda equina or conus medullaris. Using multi-MUP analysis, 20 MUPs were obtained from patients' EAS muscles. Their MUP parameters were compared with normative data from 64 controls. The diagnostic sensitivities of mean values/"outliers" of MUP parameters for detecting neuropathic EAS muscles were calculated (area 25%/30%; number of turns 18%/29%; size index 13%/ 24%; thickness 18%/18%; amplitude 17%/17%; spike duration 20%/9%; duration 15%/12%, number of phases 15%/11%; and their combination 51%/ 52%), Altogether, the cumulative sensitivity of multi-MUP analysis using both mean values and "outliers" was 62%. The combination of MUP parameters improves the diagnostic yield of MUP analysis, but the influence on specificity remains unknown. (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 951
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Which patients need referral for anal sphincter electromyography?
    Podnar, S
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2006, 33 (02) : 278 - 282
  • [32] Reference values of motor unit potentials (MUPs) of the external anal sphincter muscle
    Del Rey, AP
    Entrena, BF
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (11) : 1832 - 1839
  • [33] Comparison of anal sonography with conventional needle electromyography in the evaluation of anal sphincter defects
    Enck, P
    vonGiesen, HJ
    Schafer, A
    Heyer, T
    Gantke, B
    Flesch, S
    Arendt, G
    Schmitz, N
    Frieling, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 91 (12): : 2539 - 2543
  • [34] A DISPOSABLE ANAL PLUG ELECTRODE FOR PELVIC FLOOR ANAL-SPHINCTER ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
    LOSE, G
    KRISTENSEN, JK
    ANDERSEN, JT
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (02): : 249 - 252
  • [35] Respective value of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and anal sphincter electromyography in neurogenic fecal incontinence
    Thomas, C
    Lefaucheur, JP
    Galula, G
    de Parades, V
    Bourguignon, J
    Atienza, P
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 32 (01): : 85 - 90
  • [36] Electromyography of the external anal sphincter in patients with Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy: Frequency of abnormal spontaneous activity and polyphasic motor unit potentials
    Schwarz, J
    Kornhuber, M
    Bischoff, C
    Straube, A
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 1997, 20 (09) : 1167 - 1172
  • [37] Anal sphincter motor unit potential (MUP) differences between sides, and between rest and voluntary contraction in normal subjects
    Daube, J
    Traue, J
    Litchy, W
    Mowzoon, N
    Bharucha, A
    NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (05) : A358 - A359
  • [38] The Efficient Estimation of Motor Unit Excitability Parameters in Needle Electromyography Experiments
    Azadi, Nammam Ali
    Jelyani, Keramat Nouri
    Roshani, Daem
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 43 (02) : 261 - 262
  • [39] RELATIONSHIPS OF VARIOUS MOTOR UNIT POTENTIAL PARAMETERS TO MOTOR UNIT SIZE
    JABRE, JF
    BAUERMEISTER, W
    GAN, R
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 1988, 11 (09) : 976 - 976
  • [40] The motor unit and quantitative electromyography
    Bromberg, Mark B.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2020, 61 (02) : 131 - 142