Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study

被引:21
|
作者
Chan, Heang-Ping [1 ]
Helvie, Mark A. [1 ]
Hadjiiski, Lubomir [1 ]
Jeffries, Deborah O. [1 ]
Klein, Katherine A. [1 ]
Neal, Colleen H. [1 ]
Noroozian, Mitra [1 ]
Paramagul, Chintana [1 ]
Roubidoux, Marilyn A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,Med Inn Bldg C477, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Digital breast tomosynthesis; BI-RADS assessment; ROC observer study; SCREENING-PROGRAM; 3D MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION; COMBINATION; EXPERIENCE; 2-VIEW; CLASSIFICATION; CALCIFICATIONS; IMPLEMENTATION; CANCERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2017.04.016
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: This study aimed to compare Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment of lesions in two-view digital mammogram (DM) to two-view wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) without DM. Materials and Methods: With Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, two view DBTs were acquired from 134 subjects and the corresponding DMs were collected retrospectively. The study included 125 subjects with 61 malignant (size: 3.9-36.9 mm, median: 13.4 mm) and 81 benign lesions (size: 4.8-43.8 mm, median: 12.0 mm), and 9 normal subjects. The cases in the two modalities were read independently by six experienced Mammography Quality Standards Act radiologists in a fully crossed counterbalanced manner. The readers were blinded to the prevalence of malignant, benign, or normal cases and were asked to assess the lesions based on the BI-RADS lexicon. The ratings were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic methodology. Results: Lesion conspicuity was significantly higher (P << .0001) and fewer lesion margins were considered obscured in DBT. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the six readers increased significantly (P = .0001) from 0.783 (range: 0.723-0.886) for DM to 0.911 (range: 0.884-0.936) for DBT. Of the 366 ratings for malignant lesions, 343 on DBT and 278 on DM were rated as BI-RADS 4a and above. Of the 486 ratings for benign lesions, 220 on DBT and 206 on DM were rated as BI-RADS 4a and above. On average, 17.8% (65 of 366) more malignant lesions and 2.9% (14 of 486) more benign lesions would be recommended for biopsy using DBT. The inter-radiologist variability was reduced significantly. Conclusion: With DBT alone, the BI-RADS assessment of breast lesions and inter-radiologist reliability were significantly improved compared to DM.
引用
收藏
页码:1372 / 1379
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance Study
    Gur, David
    Abrams, Gordon S.
    Chough, Denise M.
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Hakim, Christiane M.
    Perrin, Ronald L.
    Rathfon, Grace Y.
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    Zuley, Margarita L.
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (02) : 586 - 591
  • [2] Masses detection in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a model observer study
    Castella, C.
    Ruschin, M.
    Eckstein, M. P.
    Abbey, C. K.
    Kinkel, K.
    Verdun, F. R.
    Tingberg, A.
    Bochud, F. O.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2009: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2009, 7263
  • [3] Digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot observer study
    Good, Walter F.
    Abrams, Gordon S.
    Catullo, Victor J.
    Chough, Denise M.
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Hakim, Christiane M.
    Gur, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) : 865 - 869
  • [4] Characterization of breast masses: a comparative study between automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)
    Hashem, Lamiaa Mohamed Bassam
    Ali, Reham Hussein Mohamed
    Helal, Maha Hussein
    Gemeae, Emad ELdin E. L.
    Moustafa, Amr Farouk Ibrahim
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01):
  • [5] Characterization of breast masses: a comparative study between automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)
    Lamiaa Mohamed Bassam Hashem
    Reham Hussein Mohamed Ali
    Maha Hussein Helal
    Emad ELdin E. L. Gemeae
    Amr Farouk Ibrahim Moustafa
    [J]. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 51
  • [6] AN OBSERVER PERFORMANCE STUDY COMPARING THE INTERPRETATION OF FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY WITH DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS
    Wasan, Rema K.
    Iqbal, Asif
    Evans, David R.
    Peacock, Clare
    Morel, Juliet C.
    Douiri, Abdel
    Michell, Michael J.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (06): : 32 - 32
  • [7] Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: Preliminary experience
    Chan, HP
    Wei, J
    Sahiner, B
    Rafferty, EA
    Wu, T
    Roubidoux, MA
    Moore, RH
    Kopans, DB
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Helvie, MA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) : 1075 - 1080
  • [8] Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Kim, Won Hwa
    Chang, Jung Min
    Koo, Hye Ryoung
    Seo, Mirinae
    Bae, Min Sun
    Lee, Joongyub
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (02) : 148 - 155
  • [9] Use of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening: Are Cancers as Conspicuous on Synthetic Mammograms as They Are on Full Field Digital Mammograms?
    Mello-Thoms, Claudia
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 764 - 765
  • [10] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Toledano, Alicia
    di Maggio, Cosimo
    Baldan, Enrica
    Bezzon, Elisabetta
    La Grassa, Manuela
    Pescarini, Luigi
    Polico, Ilaria
    Proietti, Alessandro
    Toffoli, Aida
    Muzzio, Pier Carlo
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (07) : 1545 - 1553