Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

被引:7
|
作者
Kim, Won Hwa [1 ]
Chang, Jung Min [1 ]
Koo, Hye Ryoung [2 ]
Seo, Mirinae [3 ]
Bae, Min Sun [1 ]
Lee, Joongyub [4 ]
Moon, Woo Kyung [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehangno, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Digital mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; breast neoplasms; sensitivity and specificity; diagnostic performance; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; POPULATION; CLASSIFICATION; AVAILABILITY; PERFORMANCE; READERS; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1177/0284185116647211
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Although digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an emerging technique yielding higher sensitivity and specificity compared to digital mammography (DM) alone, relative contribution of prior mammograms on the interpretation of DBT combined with DM has not been investigated. Purpose: To retrospectively compare the diagnostic performances of DM, DM+DBT, and DM+DBT with prior mammograms. Material and Methods: Three breast radiologists independently reviewed images of 116 patients with 24 cancers in the sequential order of DM, DM+DBT, and DM+DBT with prior mammograms using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment categories. Results: The average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of DM, DM+DBT, and DM+DBT with prior mammograms were 0.712, 0.777, and 0.816, respectively. Adding prior mammograms did not significantly affect the AUC of DM+DBT (P = 0.108), whereas adding DBT significantly increased the AUC of DM (P = 0.009). Sensitivity for DM, DM+DBT, and DM+DBT with prior mammograms was 58.3%, 69.4%, and 69.4%, and specificities were 84.1%, 85.9%, and 93.8%, respectively. Addition of DBT significantly increased the sensitivity (P = 0.0090) of DM. Prior mammograms significantly improved the specificity of DM+DBT (P + 0.0004), whereas adding prior mammogram did not affect sensitivity of DM+DBT (P = 1.000). Conclusion: DBT significantly increases the overall sensitivity and diagnostic performance of DM. Prior mammograms significantly increase the specificity of DM+DBT but have no significant effect on sensitivity and overall diagnostic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 155
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of the Availability of Prior Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images on the Interpretation of Mammograms
    Hakim, Christiane M.
    Catullo, Victor J.
    Chough, Denise M.
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Kelly, Amy E.
    Shinde, Dilip D.
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    Wallace, Luisa P.
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gur, David
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [2] Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Moseley, Tanya W.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 59 (02): : 362 - 379
  • [3] Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening
    Lee, Janie M.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    Liao, Geraldine J.
    Hippe, Daniel S.
    Kim, Adrienne E.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Rahbar, Habib
    Scheel, John R.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 55 : 119 - 125
  • [4] A comparison of reading times in full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Connor, S. J.
    Lim, Y. Y.
    Tate, C.
    Entwistle, H.
    Morris, J.
    Whiteside, S.
    Sergeant, J.
    Wilson, M.
    Beetles, U.
    Boggis, C.
    Gilbert, F.
    Astley, S.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14
  • [5] A comparison of reading times in full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    SJ Connor
    YY Lim
    C Tate
    H Entwistle
    J Morris
    S Whiteside
    J Sergeant
    M Wilson
    U Beetles
    C Boggis
    F Gilbert
    S Astley
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [6] The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Tucker, Lorraine
    Gillan, Maureen G. C.
    Willsher, Paula
    Cooke, Julie
    Duncan, Karen A.
    Michell, Michael J.
    Dobson, Hilary M.
    Lim, Yit Yoong
    Purushothaman, Hema
    Strudley, Celia
    Astley, Susan M.
    Morrish, Oliver
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (04) : 1 - +
  • [7] Breast cancer screening in women with and without implants: retrospective study comparing digital mammography to digital mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ethan O. Cohen
    Rachel E. Perry
    Hilda H. Tso
    Kanchan A. Phalak
    Michele D. Lesslie
    Karen E. Gerlach
    Jia Sun
    Ashmitha Srinivasan
    Jessica W. T. Leung
    [J]. European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 9499 - 9510
  • [8] Breast cancer screening in women with and without implants: retrospective study comparing digital mammography to digital mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Cohen, Ethan O.
    Perry, Rachel E.
    Tso, Hilda H.
    Phalak, Kanchan A.
    Lesslie, Michele D.
    Gerlach, Karen E.
    Sun, Jia
    Srinivasan, Ashmitha
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (12) : 9499 - 9510
  • [9] Comparison of Radiologists Reading Errors Between Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis
    Nishikawa, R.
    D'Ardenne, N.
    Wu, C.
    Wolfe, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E307 - E308
  • [10] Breast Cancer Detection: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Mammography versus Digital Mammography
    Ha, Su Min
    Chang, Jung Min
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (03)